Global Warming Fascist Movement & Academic Welfare

One of the most shocking things I bumped into in the middle of the night was when I input the data on the energy output of the sun and then correlated that into our data base back to 6000BC. Low and behold, the 300 year cycle matched up with the rise and fall of empires, nations, and city states. Suddenly, the 309.6 year cycle of the Economic Confidence Model (ECM) made sense. What I had discovered from tracking to footsteps of mankind was not the CAUSE, but the EFFECT.

- - Martin Armstrong


[link to armstrongeconomics.com]

Climate Change – the Fraud to Justify More Taxes

The Global Climate Change crowd really need to be imprisoned. They have been deliberately creating a giant fraud that is just amazing.

The low in the energy output of the sun was during the late 1700s. They have attributed everything to man and ignored long historical evidence that demonstrates there is a cyclical beat to the sun just as there is to your heart.

The Global Warming con-artists are clever but reveal either their stupidity or their total dishonesty. There is no in between here. If they have not done their research historically beyond 1800AD, then they are complacent or has done so and are trying to find post-1800 to suit their tactic to get money.\

[link to armstrongeconomics.com]


Duke University Disagrees with Global Warming

Duke University has parted from the other universities who benefit from collecting money to further Global Warming theories.

Duke actually conducted a study of just 1,000 years of temperature records. They analyzed the whole thing and compared it to the most severe emissions scenarios by the IPCC

What they discovered is simply that Global warming hasn’t happened as fast as expected. The research claims that natural variability in surface temperatures over the course of a decade can account for increases and dips in warming rates. Hence, this is not a man made trend.

Duke University seems to be far more objective than those seeking to create propaganda for global warming that the government can use as the excuse to raise taxes.

[link to armstrongeconomics.com]

Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures

The Global Warming Policy Foundation has enlisted an international team of five distinguished scientists to carry out a full inquiry

Last month, we are told, the world enjoyed “its hottest March since records began in 1880”. This year, according to “US government scientists”, already bids to outrank 2014 as “the hottest ever”. The figures from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were based, like all the other three official surface temperature records on which the world’s scientists and politicians rely, on data compiled from a network of weather stations by NOAA’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN).

But here there is a puzzle. These temperature records are not the only ones with official status. The other two, Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the University of Alabama (UAH), are based on a quite different method of measuring temperature data, by satellites. And these, as they have increasingly done in recent years, give a strikingly different picture. Neither shows last month as anything like the hottest March on record, any more than they showed 2014 as “the hottest year ever".

So strong is the evidence that all this calls for proper investigation that these articles have now brought a heavyweight response. The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has enlisted an international team of five distinguished scientists to carry out a full inquiry into just how far these manipulations of the data may have distorted our picture of what is really happening to global temperatures.

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

. . . current government policy on climate change is a “fools errand” because the climate is too complex a system for humans to set meaningful goals with any chance of attaining them. “Our ignorance is simply enormous when it comes to the climate system, and our understanding is certainly not strong and solid enough to make policy about climate because we don’t even know what it’s going to do, so how can we make a policy that says ‘I want to make the climate do something’ when we don’t know what makes the climate do what it does?” he asked.

However, he noted, “there is still a strong belief system that greenhouse gases control the climate, and so if that is your belief system, then it doesn't really matter what the evidence shows.”

- - Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at the University of Alabama/Huntsville

[link to www.breitbart.com]

Global Waming - which after many consecutive years of decreasing temperature world wide overnight turned to climate change, that the elites to not waste their propagandist investment up to that point and keep the spin going (climate change - that is a nonsense in terms - it is normal that climate is changing from winter to summer, from day to night, etc) it is just a scheme to take over the world, under pretext to implement this fake, lying and mischievous propaganda, and after they put internationally their grid of control, they will proceed as No Dhimmi said, to population reduction!


Hear them here, what they plan for you and your family, listen carefully:



And be warned, after they finish with their agenda, your life (if you lucky to survive) will look like that:



Hoping your IQ people enough elevated to understand that you and yourr family will be, if not out-rightly killed, be a slave w/o any kind of right and any recourse in front of TPTB.

It's very bad, and the Jade Helm 2015, is THE trigger of all of that!

Thread: **** VERY IMPORTANT **** Prophet DAVID WILKERSON and Jade Helm 2015 ... people, it's not good! (Page 9)

Thread: Maurice Newman ( chairman of the Prime Minister's Business Advisory Council ) says the UN is using climate change to end democracy

they must have gotten tips from "1984"
the meaning of words has been negated

what this is
is a wealth redistribution scheme
and they are too cowardly
to admit that they want the money

here too
the earth wobbled back to "warm" position recently

it bothers them
that we are not drinking the koolaid

maybe it's a new religion
like "scientologist"

the carbon tax will allow more polluting
if the polluters pay the tax

if the climate changes
you need to put your resources
into adapting to the change
you can't stop it

time was recently bought out
so, they are using for their own
bully pulpit

this is why there is a climate panic
those who were counting on getting rich
from carbon credits
are in the hole now

the people who scream about "global warming"
melted the arctic with their NATO/IPCC aerosol experiments
this is why the methane is venting
they melted the siberian tundra/bogs full of methane

and they use horror stories to scare us

and now that the Pope has joined the bandwagon of the UN/IPCC
will all catholics have to scream "climate change and carbon credits for all"?

since they have the pope on their side
they can do the climate inquistion
and threaten us with death
if we don't believe

they are a religion now
the pope is their leader

The same scientist created this little gem.


That's the problem with the people that can't average a temperature. You're all nut jobs.

Germane to this issue is the 2009 Climategate scandal.

I offer this reminder of the scandal:

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash, says Christopher Booker.

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]


Thus, “Climate Change” came into being. Now, man is responsible whenever there is a hail storm, snow storm, a tornado, etc. Any deviation in a “normal” weather pattern is due to man’s use of energy, particularly fossil fuels. Thus, the concept of Cap and Trade was born which would hand over all energy to a few enlightened men so that they could save the planet. Forget save the planet, the science does not support the fraud. Handing over the world’s economy based on pseudo science is the goal. The present crisis in California helps to establish the public “legitimacy” of this goal and will serve to convince the people to give up their property, their rights and their fortunes in order to save the Earth. It will work because how many people in the general population knows the difference between a control group and an experimental group?

Last Edited by No Dhimmi on 06/19/2015 03:20 PM

Thread: A Former Climate Modeler for the Australian Greenhouse Office Says Mathematics Used by UN Overstates Global Warming by Ten-Fold

a good book was writetn in the 90's about this topic
it's called "The Cosmic Winter"
and shows the cyclical nature of warming and cooling

Not not when it has been doing that sence the beginning of time.warming and cooling, cooling and warming.

Pollution is Good for you