Child-abuser Jimmy Savile's youngest victim was aged two, abuse reports 'reach 500'

Someone posted this on another thread last week which was definatly an eye opener. [link to youtu.be]

Jimmy Savile's family have had the gravestone removed along with the flowers as a mark of respect. It just leaves a small hole and no bush around it.

Just what he would have wanted.

How the hell is this possible?

Many people at the BBC said that they knew all about Saville, but didn't do anything.

What kind of protection did the monster have and from whom? How high does it go?

was the impersonation really necessary?

It's not a question of how high does it go, but rather how deep down the rabbit hole. Pure filth, disgust and evil lurks through out the Royals and elite.

That one took me a moment...

... well done indeed!

I remeber some years ago watching an interview of Jimmy Savile, by "pop star" Jarvis Cocker.

That video has been completely expunged from the internet.



It was quite revealing of Savile, as a slippery eel who never directly answered any question put to him.

it's here...

[link to vdownload.eu]

500!!??

That's completely nutso crazy. Like...that's practically a job...wonder what he did for fun?

Thank you! I thought "They" had deleted all the copies!

Panorama - Savile: The Power to Abuse is on BBC One on 2 June at 20:30 BST.

Then there's also the question: why was he protected? I can understand that a very high-level politician, banker or CEO might have "friends" who help to bury an incident or two so that their cashcow/powermonger doesn't disappear behind the bars, but covering 500+ cases of molestation and rape for a mere VJ?

I can only think that he had dirt on some very powerful people and had covered his ass so that he wouldn't get suicided.

Jimmy knew all the top people who really counted, like the very evil Royal Family.

That's why he had carte blanche to do what he did, and why numerous police investigations into his activities went nowhere.

He was also a dangerous man in his own right. When he ran dance clubs in Leeds and Manchester, his teams of doormen/bouncers (who are usually thugs who have been in prison for crimes of ultra-violence) were shit-scared of him.



He had a dark power protecting him.

Update: I watched that video, and it cuts off after about 5 1/2 minutes.

Looks like "They" knobbled it!

I began to watch the vid of him and I thought to myself - he had to have the protection of Satan to be doing all of this and getting away with it - and seems to be the case:

[link to www.express.co.uk]

“She recalled being led into a room that was filled with candles on the lowest level of the hospital, somewhere that was not regularly used by staff. Several adults were there, including Jimmy Savile who, like the others, was wearing a robe and a mask.

“She recognised him because of his distinctive voice and the fact that his blond hair was protruding from the side of the mask. He was not the leader but he was seen as important because of his fame.

“She was molested, raped and beaten and heard words that sounded like ‘Ave Satanas’, a Latin­ised version of ‘Hail Satan’, being chanted. There was no mention of any other child being there and she cannot remember how long the attack lasted but she was left extremely frightened and shaken.”

I dunno, to me it wasn't anywhere as revealing as the Louis Theroux doco. In the Jarvis Cocker one, he's basically just showing bits from his wardrobe and old memorabilia etc. He didn't really _say_ (or give away) a heck of a lot.

The Louis Theroux one is quite menacing and disturbing in parts.. the whole thing has a creepiness running through it..

Protected by the Queen

And nothing ever came up?! WTF!

Wtf?

There's something deeply disturbing here and I'm not just talking about what Jimmy did. It's certainly shocking in its own right, but the fact that he could pursue his perversions with total impunity is the real shocker. It's like he knew he was untouchable and could do anything, including groping a kid on live tv.

There is a theory that Jack the Ripper was someone close to the royal family or even Prince Albert, but even Jack had to work in the shadows. In contrast, Savile abused kids at Broadmoor, no doubt full of CCTV cams that could have placed him at the crime scene, and most likely left physical evidence. No one reported anything. He groped a kid on TV. No one saw it. His collagues said they knew all about him. Nothing happened. He was fully exposed, yet never got stopped.

Cui bono?

If he had the Royal House to protect him, the question is why would they take such an enormous risk to the monarchy? Just because they knew Savile and the Queen had even knighted him? Doesn't make sense. What use did they have for him? Did Savile know something that would bring down the highest echelons of society if he were arrested? Probably, but if you are so well connected, how hard would it be to make Jimmy disappear together with any evidence he might have threatened to release?

No, it sounds as if someone benefitted from what he was doing. An occult cult believing that abusing kids was good for them? Did Savile procure kids for a pedophile ring with extremely powerful members? Or had reports of him been ignored and buried for so long that when they eventually turned out to be true, nobody was prepared to do anything. It would have meant that important heads would have rolled for the past failures.

Interesting if it's true that even his thugs were afraid of him. How could he possibly instill such fear in violent men?