A few years ago, I would have scorned anyone who would make such a farfetched claim. For me, the Texan represented the true patriot against the Establishment. The Texan did an excellent job at fighting the 9-11 conspiracy, which actually got me to start listening to him (however, he doesn’t talk about it much anymore). He did an excellent job at outing the Bohemian Grove conspiracy (however, I always wondered how he so easily snuck into the camp and filmed their ceremony).
Notwithstanding the Texan’s seemingly great efforts, I have grown increasingly disenchanted with him. Over the last few years, the Texan’s articles and discussions have become much more mainstream and he seems to only want to pacify the opposition.
For example, the Texan’s web articles tend to encourage the split between Republicans/Democrats and Conservatives/Liberals, Blacks/Whites, Christians/Non-Christians, Gays/Heterosexuals, etc., only adding to the Establishment’s goal of keeping the American population divided. Instead of investigating the evidence, the Texan only ridicules or attempts to “debunk” Sandy Hook/Boston Bombing/Woolwich Beheading/Santa Barbara so-called “truthers.”
It has frustrated me to listen to the Texan sponsored “debunkers” entirely ignore the most damning evidence showing that these events were staged. The Texan even uses the pejorative term “conspiracy theorist” to refer to anyone who may consider that the Sandy Hook/Boston Bombing/Woolwich Beheading/Santa Barbara events were staged. No true anti-Establishment mouthpiece would ever use the mainstream term “conspiracy theorist” as an insult to others who are seeking the truth.
Furthermore, the Texan’s acting job on CNN where he portrayed gun rights activists as out-of-control psychopaths was also very disheartening. I’m sorry, but if the Texan was legitimate, there is no way in hell he would act like such an ass ( [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] – the Texan would have appeared level-headed, calm, and articulate – instead he played the violent crazy gun enthusiast – exactly what the Establishment and CNN would have wanted from him.
Anyways, I came across this video the other day – and it hit me (same feeling I got when I first opened my eyes to 9-11 and the fake moon landings) – HOLY SH** - THIS MIGHT ACTUALLY BE TRUE! – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] If it is true – the Texan/Bill Hicks conspiracy would prove that we are totally screwed – i.e., the opposition to the Establishment is entirely controlled (of course, that isn’t too crazy for many here at GLP), and this would probably include Jesse Ventura, Ron Paul, Joe Rogan, Mark Dice, etc. I decided to put some time into it and came across some interesting facts.
Sure enough, the Texan character is roughly anonymous until shortly after the alleged death of Bill Hicks in February 1994.
Sure enough, the Texan seems to have lied about his age (according to Wikipedia, the Texan was born in 1974 – so, he is currently only 40? – I don’t think so). Of course, if Bill Hicks (I have always been a fan of Bill Hicks) was set up by the Establishment to become the Texan, along with plastic surgery, the Texan would have a pretty good cover story, with family members (dentist father), birth certificate, school records, a team of shills, etc. Of course, the Establishment wouldn’t ever falsify birth certificates or use shills, would they?
Sure enough, Bill Hicks and the Texan share the same mannerisms (here is a hilarious clip of Bill Hicks – note how his mannerisms closely match the Texan’s – the finger pointing is almost exactly the same – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Compare Bill Hicks’s videos on YouTube with the Texan’s – the mannerisms and gait are shockingly similar.
Sure enough, Bill Hicks and the Texan have the exact same teeth and share several other facial features ( [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] What are the chances that both individuals would have the exact same spacing and misshaped teeth (at one time the Texan had caps – other photos show him without the caps)? This is pretty strong evidence that Bill Hicks became the Texan.
Sure enough, Bill Hicks’s best friend, Kevin Booth, also seems to be a very good friend and associate of the Texan. Here is a Wikipedia article on Kevin Booth – note that Kevin Booth and Bill Hicks were also at Waco a couple of years before the showed up at Waco and began making headlines in the alternative media – [
link to en.wikipedia.org] (what are the chances?). From the article, “Martial Law 9/11: Rise of The Police State (2005) was co-produced by Booth with [the Texan], who directed the documentary.” Co-production of at least one video with Kevin Booth and the Texan (what are the chances that Bill Hicks’s best friend would just happen to co-produce a video with the Texan, who looks exactly like Bill Hicks?).
Here is a video of Kevin Booth and Bill Hicks at Waco doing a documentary (before the final siege) – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Here is the Texan showing up at Waco long after the siege doing a documentary – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)] This video shows the Texan receiving a Bill Hicks plaque from Kevin Booth (what are the chances that the Texan would receive a Bill Hicks picture and plaque before a connection was even made between the Texan and Bill Hicks?) – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Here is an interview with the Texan and Kevin Booth – of course, they are both laughing about anyone who believes that the Texan was Bill Hicks (they never addressed the fact that Bill Hicks looks almost exactly the same as the Texan, share the same teeth, mannerisms, were both in documentaries in Waco, both have a very close relationship with Kevin Booth, and both made movies with Kevin Booth?) – [
link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
If the Texan was legitimate, why did he and Kevin Booth not sincerely address the evidence (even jokingly) instead of just making fun of the looney “conspiracy theorists,” and employ the Establishment’s favorite
reductio ad absurdum strategy (e.g., the Texan is actually Richard Pryor)?
The coincidences are beyond shocking. The Texan’s silly reactions to the claims only further indicate their veracity. I have not reached a 100% conclusion on this matter, but as of right now I am strongly leaning to the conclusion that the Texan was formerly known as Bill Hicks. I am open to change my mind, so I would like to hear some of your intelligent opinions, thoughts, evidence, etc. If you agree with my tentative conclusion, please provide any more evidence that you have come across.
United States
