According to the bible, ALL OF MANKIND IS DESCENDED...

motherfuckers....

use your imagination...

And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: (Genesis 5:4 KJV)

I guess the part were he had other sons and daughters flew over ur head op ?

there were people already in the world outside of the garden of Eden apparently. That's if you believe that particular bible.

it doesn't matter about the rest of the children....Christ's seedline runs through Seth....that's the point...

and no...all the races were created 2000 years before Adam and Eve, on the SIXTH DAY (one day in the LORDS's time is 1,000 years)...

So, blacks, browns, asian whites, japanese, chinese, all mankind were created on the 6th day and God said IT WAS GOOD.

The EIGHTH DAY MAN, a/k/a ADAM, was made DIFFERENTLY than the sixth day creation.....the EIGHTH Day Adam, God BLEW HIS SPIRIT INTO ADAM'S NOSTRILS TO GIVE HIM LIFE....this is why Adam, to SETH to Christ is ADAMIC souls..because they all had the Holy Spirit within them. get it?

Read Christ's genealolgy Luke 3:23....all those generations had the Holy spirit within them, this is called the "KEY OF DAVID"....if you know this genealogy, then you can't be fooled by satan....YOU SEE SATAN HAS NO GENEALOGY....HE CAN'T BE CHRIST, BECAUSE HE NEVER WAS BORN OF WOMAN.....HE HAS NO BELLYBUTTON! Therefore, if you know the genealogy of CHRIST, you cannot be fooled by satan, because satan has no human relatives......

It's all a huge crock of BS.
Fairy tales for the sub-genius.

Last Edited by Cat.Man.Deux on 06/02/2014 09:11 PM

No ur wrong .. Genesis 2 is a more detailed account of genesis 1 day 6 .. It says eve is the mother of all living that disproves ur idea
Also the whole one day with The Lord is a thousand is a scripture about how God is timeless not to be taken literally .. Do u think we should work 6000 years and then rest a 1000 in memory of Gods sabbath instead of the obvious teaching that we should work 6 rest 1 .. like exodus
tells us .. U probaly do !

Done.
Marriage hasn't changed much if Adam and Eve only had two male children in the 930 years they were married .....
Or, .... use the number of 100 as how many children their children had and that would be about the population of the whole world during the 1300 years between the first birth and the flood. Flintstones and Jetsons all in one place at the same time.

Angels would have been allowed in Eden (the whole earth) but not in the Garden area (defined in Ge:2) Ge:1 was how dust came to be available, Ge:2 shows Adam alive in the garden when it had no rain. It was on the 6th day that rain was allowed to enter and the garden would have had all the 'seeds' that Eden had as she developed over the previous 4 billion years (old earth creation theory). Ge:2 is also what will happen when New Jerusalem lands on the New Earth and Adam and Eve are the first couple to enter there and the creatures they named will come back to life as the waters come out of the City. Behind them will be all of their children so the beginning will be a burst of life and then it settles down to a slower growth pattern until everything that had life in this earth is alive in the New Earth. Since angels will have moved to their new heaven that means the universe will be the new earth. If the area outside the garden hosted angels in the past then that was a static population and mankind would have found abandoned cities as they explored the world at a slow rate. The universe should also hold things made by many angels that are ours once we get there.

Would you agree that Eve is the woman mentioned in Re:12? That chapter would then be about the 3 times that Satan interacted with Eve. The garden was when God gave Eve pain in childbirth, the 2nd woman in Re:12 is Mary, the 'seed of Eve' that gave birth to the one that says will bruised in the heel. The last woman in Re:12 are the Gentiles that will be protected as the other bruise is completed.

The 1,000 years is a day works for the OT as as keeping time until Moses came in with a different way, 120 years was the lifetime of a human rather than 'one day' which is why Adam and a few others lived as long as they did. That method of keeping time existed back then because fallen angels were the kings on the earth, their children would have inherited that rule and the giants that had 24 fingers and toes only were exterminated during the exodus wars. In Ge:6 God said the breath of life would be with men and then it would be taken away, Moses died at 120 so God took his breath away and that act washed away all his sins (as it does with all who die). That method lasts until the 1,000 year reign and then it goes back to 1,000 years being a lifetime and then a reward for doing it correctly. The ones alive on day 1 of the 1,000 years will be a static population and 1,000 years later they witness all the fallen angels being sent to the fiery lake and they are saved from that so they would be as holy as the faithful angels yet live with flesh creations.

The new earth will see children being born and at 120 they would be judged as being sinless and they would be given immortality and they would have 100 children of their own by then and they would have no more of their own children. Until 120 they would be like Adam in the garden, they would eat to remain alive, after 120 they would eat because they like the taste.


You can still view it as fiction, it just changes to 'good fiction' rather than 'bad fiction'. Proof is said to be shown to those who demand it before they make their decision, no penalty for doing that and that is better than jumping on while having a few doubts.

Last Edited by Wayfaring Stranger on 06/02/2014 09:56 PM

No. Actually some really good stuff in there. Explains pretty much all you know when combined with the Quran and vedic stuff.

Yet what of tomorrow when man becomes disillusioned with leaders and a God that would let it continue. Man unable to see the tempest about, unaware still has no faith. Sad, rambling.

genesis 5

2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

adam was male and female... not one person... many

eve who was taken out of adam is the same.



------------------------------------------

When you were a precious child, and that is not to say
that you're not that very child today...

You may have heard the story of the very first two people made;
that you could see beyond this tale, i pray.

Adam was a race of men, male and female, he.
Eve, who was taken out of Adam's rib, the same.

If you've never pondered this, i just don't know what I can say.
There really is not one that we can blame.

They were innocent of knowledge; only one, they did obey...
until their eyes were opened, to their shame.

Transgression they were made to make, from innocence to agency,
and unto them the mighty wisdom came.

When they expired, it was only after an eternity,
according to the holy hand of love.

Eve being taken out of man, and specially been made for him,
they two had children in the stars above.

Now we can rise above the stars in ships of feather-weighted Alumide.
And we can do the work of our God's love.

But first we open up our eyes, and see our special place in this...
that we are to the master's hand, a glove.

not true, there were already people here!

According to the Sumerian texts the Anunnaki took an already existing primitive humanoid and blended their DNA with it.


They even hosted the fetus in their own womb and gave birth to us.


But Adamu and Tiamat / Adam and Eve could not procreate until Enki gave them the fruit of the Tree of Knowing.


The story goes that to give them the power of procreation Enki had to give adam and eve some of his life essence.


So Ninghizidda put all three of them to sleep and took the Rib of Enki and extracted the Life essence from it, then he inserted it into the rib of adam and eve.


After this surgery they were able to have Children on their own.

Like the 'gods'.

ok, from Spain - S (serpent) Pain (penalty) Pan (theon)

The origins of the Roman name Hispania, from which the modern name España was derived, are uncertain and are possibly unknown due to inadequate evidence. Down the centuries there have been a number of accounts and hypotheses:

The Renaissance scholar Antonio de Nebrija proposed that the word Hispania evolved from the Iberian word Hispalis, meaning "city of the western world". Jesús Luis Cunchillos argues that the root of the term span is the Phoenecian word spy, meaning "to forge metals". Therefore i-spn-ya would mean "the land where metals are forged".[8]

Hispania may derive from the poetic use of the term Hesperia, reflecting the Greek perception of Italy as a "western land" or "land of the setting sun" (Hesperia, Ἑσπερία in Greek) and Spain, being still further west, as Hesperia ultima.[9]

It may be a derivation of the Punic I-Shpania (אי שפניא), meaning "island of rabbits", "land of rabbits" or "edge", a reference to Spain's location at the end of the Mediterranean; Roman coins struck in the region from the reign of Hadrian show a female figure with a coney at her feet,[10] and Strabo called it the "land of the rabbits".[11]

There is the claim that "Hispania" derives from the Basque word Ezpanna meaning "edge" or "border", another reference to the fact that the Iberian Peninsula constitutes the southwest corner of the European continent.[9]

and

CUNICULUS ‘RABBIT’ — A CELTIC ETYMOLOGY
[link to webcache.googleusercontent.com]



coney (n.) Look up coney at Dictionary.com
c.1200, from Anglo-French conis, plural of conil "long-eared rabbit" (Lepus cunicula) from Latin cuniculus (source of Spanish conejo, Portuguese coelho, Italian coneglio), the small, Spanish variant of the Italian hare (Latin lepus), the word perhaps from Iberian Celtic (classical writers say it is Spanish).

Rabbit arose 14c. to mean the young of the species, but gradually pushed out the older word 19c., after British slang picked up coney as a punning synonym for cunny "cunt" (compare connyfogle "to deceive in order to win a woman's sexual favors"). The word was in the King James Bible [Prov. xxx:26, etc.], however, so it couldn't be entirely dropped, and the solution was to change the pronunciation of the original short vowel (rhyming with honey, money) to rhyme with boney. In the Old Testament, the word translates Hebrew shaphan "rock-badger." Rabbits not being native to northern Europe, there was no Germanic or Celtic word for them.


Sun Sets in the West.

Sun DESCENDS in the West.

People descended from S-Pain after Christopher Columbus came.

rabbis

rabbits

fuck like rabbits

cunnts

and rabbit mean little dog

the Cerberus

Thread: America

that must mean we were ascended
s
don't worry be happy oo ooo oo oo ooo , ooo ooo ooo o

and somehow after the flood,the six people that survived it repopulated the entire planet with people of all races, ans somehow genetics were different because their inbreeding didn't result in humanity being a bunch of fucking vegetables after a few generations.

Honestly, I try not to be one of those asshole atheists but when someone tells me that they believe that the wold was flooded up to the mountaintops (impossible) and that six people repopulated the entire fucking earth (super-duper impossible) i honestly question how they graduated grade school. the sad part is that some of these people run our country and are in charge of the science education of it's children......

The wives of Noah's sons would have been female giants (24 fingers and toes) so that is how giants came to be after the flood. The son that went to Canaan would have been where those giants came from that died in the exodus wars. For every 10 children born 5 would be 5 fingered and 5 would be 6 fingered. If the 5 fingered ones married each other all their children would have 5 fingers, same for the 6 fingered giants. That is where the genetic diversity comes from.

The water needed to cover the high hills and mountain tops with 22ft of snow (ice) and rain on all the other land areas would drop the ocean level 5.5ft. After the snow stopped it was 150 days (5 months) before the tops could be seen as being rock.

The creation days are even more different because in the old earth creation theory the creation days were 10x longer as you go back in time. For example day 6 was from 400,000BC to 40,000BC and day 2 way from 4,000,000,000BC to 400,000,000BC.

Once you add the realities we know today the books becomes more literal than imaginary. The one I like the best is 'all the nations on the earth' from Jer:25 is to come under judgment and the 4th seal has an area called 1/4 of the earth. Only with the maps we have today would 1/4 of the earth be known to be all of the dry land which means somebody did the math way back when it was an unknown thing. That is the start of a longer topic that has similar 'explanations' that points to one author who knows how it ends before He writes the beginning using many different Scribes.

Genetics 101 - learn what a Phenotype is


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

I don't know anything about giants but that's not how genetics work dude. they would have had to have all of the sons and daughters would have been related to noah in some way, with so few choices of who to mate with, it would have resulted in a genetic bottleneck. 6 people could not have produces the massive genetic diversity that we see today

animals would have had an even harder time because there were only two of them, the animals would have gotten deleterious mutations within only a few generations. no species could propagate with only two of them.

There weren't any Asians or 'So called Whites', who are actually just different shades of red, around during biblical times. Only Black/Brown humanoids existed. They were made in the image of the lord.

Genesis accounts for created mankind male and female before Adam and Eve...