| Users Online Now: 1,968 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 629,012 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,061,199 | Threads Today: 388 | Posts Today: 7,156 |
| 12:09 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,968 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 629,012 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,061,199 | Threads Today: 388 | Posts Today: 7,156 |
| 12:09 PM | ||
ISRAEL-GAZA 50-Day War | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66726036  Russia04/03/2015 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 67192318  United States04/03/2015 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal? Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom You chicken hawks amazing me. US has contingency plans in place with Pakistan. The govt will eventually fall or lose control and we will secure their nukes. Pakistan could potentially have hundreds of nukes if nothing is done. Trust me, status quo will not continue much longer. Maybe they are next in line for an "arab spring" actually I'm of the position that they shouldn't have them,way too unstable of a country next to another nuke country. I agree... Wait for this Syria/Iran war to finish out... the Sunnis will be able to focus their attention on India, and Pakistan will win if things keep going the way they are. :caliphate: |
JazzyG Forum Administrator  User ID: 5725534 United States04/03/2015 12:28 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Like no other country in the entire world has kids that do shite like that. Quoting: JazzyG Only the Jews would be demonized and laughed at for it. You know why... don't act stupid. :haterzride: To know where your heart is, look where your mind goes when it wanders. A rock in bad hands killed Abel. A rock in good hands killed Goliath. It isn't about the rock. A true warrior fights not because he hates the one in front of him, but because he loves those behind him. INTP-A |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JazzyG Forum Administrator User ID: 5725534 United States04/03/2015 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :poorthing: To know where your heart is, look where your mind goes when it wanders. A rock in bad hands killed Abel. A rock in good hands killed Goliath. It isn't about the rock. A true warrior fights not because he hates the one in front of him, but because he loves those behind him. INTP-A |
| JazzyG Forum Administrator User ID: 5725534 United States04/03/2015 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok...enough fun. Back to the news. To know where your heart is, look where your mind goes when it wanders. A rock in bad hands killed Abel. A rock in good hands killed Goliath. It isn't about the rock. A true warrior fights not because he hates the one in front of him, but because he loves those behind him. INTP-A |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| GIJGD User ID: 54815263 United States04/03/2015 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal? Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom You chicken hawks amazing me. Sigh, here I thought we were making progress--- and you go on full-meag-Tard mode binge spree again, BRD. Back to square one, m'raid. And the utterly dishonest way of debating & total failure in basic logic...is trademark of your crew. First, you want us to overlook the fact that Iron is WAY bigger sponsor of terrorism when you compare say Hezbollah's capability... with al-Qaeda's measely. (And that massive arsenal despite Israel allegedly destroyed many shipments of game-changing weaponry to Hezzies, as well as Assad's nuclear and chemical WMD capabilities) Then when that line fails... you move goal-posts to Pakistan. Who here thinks Pakistan having nukes is a "OK"... are you just trolling at this point, BRD? In fact it is precisely BECAUSE the North Korea diplomatic approach failed so spectacularly... is why the Iran deal is even worse! And I bet those people who were raising alarms and suggesting military action against the Norks in the 1990's were also called chickenhawks by your ilk. And yet limited military action THEN would have saved both the Korean peninsula AND prevented Iran from being a nuke threat today (since N-Korea famously helped Ayatollahs make a leap in their program). In fact, had something been done about North Korea OR Iran say 10 years ago when clowns like you were destroying Bush's ability to deal with the problem... it's quite possible that even Pakistan would have thought twice really going all-in on the nukes (say they'd only have a few crude ones, without missile warheads as oppposed to a whole arsenal now) Ideally? Yes, Pakistan would be de-nuclearized, too. But that ship make have already sailed. But it's NOT too late to clip Ayatollah's proverbial wings just yet. Either way, it would require massive international cooperation & consensus. But if Obama has trouble getting people on the same page re: Iran, you expect US to do so against Pakistan? Huh? Duh, use your head! |
| GIJGD User ID: 54815263 United States04/03/2015 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Israel police arrest 2 jewish guys for faking a kidnapping by Palestinians Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom Judea and Samaria District Police said Thursday that Asraf had been found in Kiryat Arba with canned food and a sleeping bag. "The 'missing man' and his friends staged a kidnapping," the police spokesman said. "We will investigate the reasons behind this and will handle this to the full extent of the law. We take this hoax very seriously. A waste of resources and rattling the entire defense system because of a deception is a most serious case, especially in this sensitive security situation." Pics [link to i.imgur.com] [link to i.imgur.com] [link to i.imgur.com] Fear of abduction: scans in Anun [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Jewish Men Staged the kidnapping and taken to detention hearings [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]  I see you're a nothing but a troll. Had you pegged right from the start. Nevermind, LOL BRD |
| < DL > (OP) User ID: 11619293 United States04/03/2015 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal? Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom You chicken hawks amazing me. Sigh, here I thought we were making progress--- and you go on full-meag-Tard mode binge spree again, BRD. Back to square one, m'raid. And the utterly dishonest way of debating & total failure in basic logic...is trademark of your crew. First, you want us to overlook the fact that Iron is WAY bigger sponsor of terrorism when you compare say Hezbollah's capability... with al-Qaeda's measely. (And that massive arsenal despite Israel allegedly destroyed many shipments of game-changing weaponry to Hezzies, as well as Assad's nuclear and chemical WMD capabilities) Then when that line fails... you move goal-posts to Pakistan. Who here thinks Pakistan having nukes is a "OK"... are you just trolling at this point, BRD? In fact it is precisely BECAUSE the North Korea diplomatic approach failed so spectacularly... is why the Iran deal is even worse! And I bet those people who were raising alarms and suggesting military action against the Norks in the 1990's were also called chickenhawks by your ilk. And yet limited military action THEN would have saved both the Korean peninsula AND prevented Iran from being a nuke threat today (since N-Korea famously helped Ayatollahs make a leap in their program). In fact, had something been done about North Korea OR Iran say 10 years ago when clowns like you were destroying Bush's ability to deal with the problem... it's quite possible that even Pakistan would have thought twice really going all-in on the nukes (say they'd only have a few crude ones, without missile warheads as oppposed to a whole arsenal now) Ideally? Yes, Pakistan would be de-nuclearized, too. But that ship make have already sailed. But it's NOT too late to clip Ayatollah's proverbial wings just yet. Either way, it would require massive international cooperation & consensus. But if Obama has trouble getting people on the same page re: Iran, you expect US to do so against Pakistan? Huh? Duh, use your head! I was going to go further in depth, but decided to keep it short. I figured you'd respond with something far more intelligent in response to his Pakistan question! lol |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68806441  Sweden04/03/2015 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal? Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom You chicken hawks amazing me. Sigh, here I thought we were making progress--- and you go on full-meag-Tard mode binge spree again, BRD. Back to square one, m'raid. And the utterly dishonest way of debating & total failure in basic logic...is trademark of your crew. First, you want us to overlook the fact that Iron is WAY bigger sponsor of terrorism when you compare say Hezbollah's capability... with al-Qaeda's measely. (And that massive arsenal despite Israel allegedly destroyed many shipments of game-changing weaponry to Hezzies, as well as Assad's nuclear and chemical WMD capabilities) Then when that line fails... you move goal-posts to Pakistan. Who here thinks Pakistan having nukes is a "OK"... are you just trolling at this point, BRD? In fact it is precisely BECAUSE the North Korea diplomatic approach failed so spectacularly... is why the Iran deal is even worse! And I bet those people who were raising alarms and suggesting military action against the Norks in the 1990's were also called chickenhawks by your ilk. And yet limited military action THEN would have saved both the Korean peninsula AND prevented Iran from being a nuke threat today (since N-Korea famously helped Ayatollahs make a leap in their program). In fact, had something been done about North Korea OR Iran say 10 years ago when clowns like you were destroying Bush's ability to deal with the problem... it's quite possible that even Pakistan would have thought twice really going all-in on the nukes (say they'd only have a few crude ones, without missile warheads as oppposed to a whole arsenal now) Ideally? Yes, Pakistan would be de-nuclearized, too. But that ship make have already sailed. But it's NOT too late to clip Ayatollah's proverbial wings just yet. Either way, it would require massive international cooperation & consensus. But if Obama has trouble getting people on the same page re: Iran, you expect US to do so against Pakistan? Huh? Duh, use your head! :waltz4: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68811182  Israel04/03/2015 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68811182 Israel04/03/2015 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68752232 United States04/03/2015 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/03/2015 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @IsraelBreaking: Pentagon has been upgrading its bunker-buster bomb to prepare weapon that could destroy Iran nuke facilities if negotiations fail - WSJ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68811182 So how many nuclear bombs did Israel buy with America's welfare money? 50-600 unconfirmed but thats the number range being reported |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68812568  Italy04/03/2015 08:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @IsraelBreaking: Hamas Leader: "Nuclear agreement w/ Iran would be in our favor, we have strong ties w/ Iran & this would improve Iran relations w/ America." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68811182 its funny to see that money works also in hamas and iran rethoric system. Money can stop "death to muricaaa" logic. Last frontier will be a meeting between obama and NK leader talking about bring coca cola and microsoft shops in NK capital. |
| GIJGD User ID: 64073543 United States04/03/2015 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal? Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom You chicken hawks amazing me. Sigh, here I thought we were making progress--- and you go on full-meag-Tard mode binge spree again, BRD. Back to square one, m'raid. And the utterly dishonest way of debating & total failure in basic logic...is trademark of your crew. First, you want us to overlook the fact that Iron is WAY bigger sponsor of terrorism when you compare say Hezbollah's capability... with al-Qaeda's measely. (And that massive arsenal despite Israel allegedly destroyed many shipments of game-changing weaponry to Hezzies, as well as Assad's nuclear and chemical WMD capabilities) Then when that line fails... you move goal-posts to Pakistan. Who here thinks Pakistan having nukes is a "OK"... are you just trolling at this point, BRD? In fact it is precisely BECAUSE the North Korea diplomatic approach failed so spectacularly... is why the Iran deal is even worse! And I bet those people who were raising alarms and suggesting military action against the Norks in the 1990's were also called chickenhawks by your ilk. And yet limited military action THEN would have saved both the Korean peninsula AND prevented Iran from being a nuke threat today (since N-Korea famously helped Ayatollahs make a leap in their program). In fact, had something been done about North Korea OR Iran say 10 years ago when clowns like you were destroying Bush's ability to deal with the problem... it's quite possible that even Pakistan would have thought twice really going all-in on the nukes (say they'd only have a few crude ones, without missile warheads as oppposed to a whole arsenal now) Ideally? Yes, Pakistan would be de-nuclearized, too. But that ship make have already sailed. But it's NOT too late to clip Ayatollah's proverbial wings just yet. Either way, it would require massive international cooperation & consensus. But if Obama has trouble getting people on the same page re: Iran, you expect US to do so against Pakistan? Huh? Duh, use your head! I was going to go further in depth, but decided to keep it short. I figured you'd respond with something far more intelligent in response to his Pakistan question! lol Uh you know how we do, playa. McScrumtrulescently. [link to img.pandawhale.com] Au revoir, SHO-SHAH-NAAAA! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/04/2015 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66728333 United States04/05/2015 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| < DL > (OP) User ID: 58917165 United States04/05/2015 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I will be locking this thread until further notice. Thanks for all who contributed.  For daily updates visit jazzy'jazzy ' s thread: Thread: The World at War |
| CrypticHollow User ID: 84290331 United States12/27/2023 02:02 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [bitchute] As stated 'Q' is no prophet But one does walk amongst you that is Gold echoes When does Chaos becomes reason ? Pre-tribulation great deception WWIII > > PEACE TREATY = Tribulation Events Housing market crash > > Crypto craze > > Stock market crash > > Crypto crash > > Gold Rush > > Silver plummets > > Gold Stabilized > > Silver Rise to meet Gold (1/20) Tick tock Tribulation begins in late 2028 CrypticHollow43 |
