Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,424 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 619,198
Pageviews Today: 1,047,096Threads Today: 348Posts Today: 6,581
12:02 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject ISRAEL-GAZA 50-Day War
Poster Handle GIJGD
Post Content
Why again is it okay for Pakistan to have nukes by a CIA deal and not Iran through a heavily monitored P5+1 deal?

You chicken hawks amazing me.
 Quoting: BlueRidgeDoom


Sigh, here I thought we were making progress--- and you go on full-meag-Tard mode binge spree again, BRD. Back to square one, m'raid.

And the utterly dishonest way of debating & total failure in basic logic...is trademark of your crew. First, you want us to overlook the fact that Iron is WAY bigger sponsor of terrorism when you compare say Hezbollah's capability... with al-Qaeda's measely.

(And that massive arsenal despite Israel allegedly destroyed many shipments of game-changing weaponry to Hezzies, as well as Assad's nuclear and chemical WMD capabilities)

Then when that line fails... you move goal-posts to Pakistan. Who here thinks Pakistan having nukes is a "OK"... are you just trolling at this point, BRD?

In fact it is precisely BECAUSE the North Korea diplomatic approach failed so spectacularly... is why the Iran deal is even worse! And I bet those people who were raising alarms and suggesting military action against the Norks in the 1990's were also called chickenhawks by your ilk.

And yet limited military action THEN would have saved both the Korean peninsula AND prevented Iran from being a nuke threat today (since N-Korea famously helped Ayatollahs make a leap in their program).

In fact, had something been done about North Korea OR Iran say 10 years ago when clowns like you were destroying Bush's ability to deal with the problem... it's quite possible that even Pakistan would have thought twice really going all-in on the nukes (say they'd only have a few crude ones, without missile warheads as oppposed to a whole arsenal now)

Ideally? Yes, Pakistan would be de-nuclearized, too. But that ship make have already sailed. But it's NOT too late to clip Ayatollah's proverbial wings just yet.

Either way, it would require massive international cooperation & consensus. But if Obama has trouble getting people on the same page re: Iran, you expect US to do so against Pakistan? Huh? Duh, use your head!
 Quoting: GIJGD 54815263


I was going to go further in depth, but decided to keep it short. I figured you'd respond with something far more intelligent in response to his Pakistan question! lol
 Quoting: < DL >


Uh you know how we do, playa.

McScrumtrulescently.

[link to img.pandawhale.com]

Au revoir, SHO-SHAH-NAAAA!
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP