| Users Online Now: 2,077 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,029,477 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,425,540 | Threads Today: 391 | Posts Today: 6,793 |
| 11:50 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,077 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,029,477 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,425,540 | Threads Today: 391 | Posts Today: 6,793 |
| 11:50 AM | ||
Chemtrail deniers are the REAL tards - I'm coining it: "Denier-tards" | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655  United States06/15/2014 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't live in the entire Rocky Mountains, just a small part of them. It is not an air traffic corridor. Never has been. Never will be. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54614092 Wow! Look at all those planes not flying over the Rockies!  Thank you. I saw that comment and almost spit my water out. Hope that wasn't the guy making the argument for chemtrails. Cool youtube video bro, but it doesn't change the fact that this is not where commercial planes fly. Some days the same jet passes over 10-20 times. I look. Yeah, its the same jet...because you say so. And you can tell from 6 miles away. Again, tell us where there is anyplace in the Rockies where a flight corridor would not be visible from the ground. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54614092 Your disinformation is ineffective. All it takes is a day of observing the aerosol operations to solidify belief. You know, you're pretty stupid for having put yourself on a pedestal. Do you seriously think the thousands and thousands of people around the world who post pictures, videos and testimony about these operations are simply misled? The changes in the sky are obvious. Obvious to thousands of people. This 'theory' didn't come from nowhere. It came as a result of changes in air traffic, weather, and the optical properties of the sky. Just admit it. You're an actor. A lier. Your purpose on this planet is to obscure the truth. What karma. Your purpose in life is to deceive your fellow man so that war may be waged on them. You must hate every living being on this planet to spend your time trying to convince everyone that their common sense is secondary to a government funded scientific establishment. The aerosol operations are obvious. There is no debate. You can watch them happen. You can correlate these operations with western advancing storm systems. There is no debate. It is happening. I can go outside and watch it. I can spend days outside without a single aircraft visible overhead. If a storm system is approaching from the west, I can set a clock by the arrival of jet after jet. All 707s. Not a single commercial 747 has EVER flown over my rural area in the Rockies. Never. This isn't an air traffic corridor. Exhaust trails don't have breaks in them. Atmospheric conditions don't change in 1000 yards sections. Either you get a trail or you don't. Instead I constantly see aircraft that don't leave trails in some parts f the sky but suddenly start trails in other parts of the sky. I see jets that fly within 500 meters of each other to leave specific patterns of trails. The debate is really; everyone's basic common sense against what the government is telling them is true. That's not a debate anyone can take seriously. Schools don't teach atmospheric science to children. It's evident why... Yes, you are are misled Schools teach basic principles of air saturation and relative humidity. These basics SHOULD BE easily applied to the situation we all see coupled with tremendous increases of all facets of aviation. More air routes, flights, planes airports, destinations. Not to mention the tremendous increase in air freight. Go ahead! Pretend that since all Chemtards believe there is something wrong, that makes it true. I don't care. I will still post truth where ignorance is posted. I don't do it for you. I love how you claim atmospheric conditions don't change in short distances. I guess natural clouds have no edges then? You are a fucking idiot. Feel free to stay that way. I don't care. And to claim there are no commercial air corridors over the rockies is just fucking stupid. The majority of clouds are in the troposphere. There are not really any natural clouds that sit up in the stratosphere and spread out to cover the entire sky. Quit playing dumb. This is a modern phenomenon. I remember, the sky never filled with stratospheric cloud haze in the past. I looked up; never saw it. Ever. Now I look up and see it but only with 'condensation' trail. Also; I don't live in the entire Rocky Mountains, just a small part of them. It is not an air traffic corridor. Never has been. Never will be. Again, don't challenge my memory. The genetically damaged foods you and your family eat and toxic chemicals you and your family drink don't have the same effect on me. So, you are suggesting that cirrus clouds are new?! I don't give a shit about YOUR memory. There is plenty of historical evidence of contrails, contrail cirrus, persistent contrails and persistent spreading contrails. The FACT that you and your stupid friends failed to see them in the past means nothing. And please tell me what area of the Rockies would have no site of airplanes flying along any corridor. I could use a good laugh when I prove you stupid. I'm waiting... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25540344 United States06/15/2014 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31543670 Why would you choose to answer the question that that says I don't care, ? (hint: I care even less for any answer on this ) When did I use his words ? Actually, you defended the use of his words. Why are you unaware of your position of the Natural News VS. Jerad miller information YOU made the comment about!?! You said we we both "playing a card" when the two "cards" were completely different! My position about Mr Miller is supported by hundreds of sites while the position of the Chemtard you were defending is that of Mr. Mike adams, whom I have yet to learn a single qualification about. They aren't the same thing? My information has several supporting sources, Mike Adams article has none! Get it!? Your Facebook info has the same merit if not less. I don't have a Facebook page You are one dense shill. You are saying "chemtards" are going to kill everyone because you researched his Facebook page. No one said or cared about if you had a fb, |
IWASTHERE  User ID: 59285928  Italy06/15/2014 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1836765 United States06/15/2014 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49693944 This is getting Shilled pretty hard. Shilltards be shillin' hard. Yeah you shills are right, planes have made chemtrail patterns my entire life. Must just be due to increased air traffic. You bitches are gonna have to work harder to own my thoughts. Back to the drawing board. Unfortunately, I'm still capable of deductive reasoning and critical thinking. Hey shilly, where do I sign up to be a keyboard warrior?  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49342655 Actually, you defended the use of his words. Why are you unaware of your position of the Natural News VS. Jerad miller information YOU made the comment about!?! You said we we both "playing a card" when the two "cards" were completely different! My position about Mr Miller is supported by hundreds of sites while the position of the Chemtard you were defending is that of Mr. Mike adams, whom I have yet to learn a single qualification about. They aren't the same thing? My information has several supporting sources, Mike Adams article has none! Get it!? Your Facebook info has the same merit if not less. I don't have a Facebook page You are one dense shill. You are saying "chemtards" are going to kill everyone because you researched his Facebook page. No one said or cared about if you had a fb, I never said anyone was going to kill anyone because of a Facebook page. The point was he was an admitted Chemtard and he killed people. He wrote about it on his page. I made no other claim. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| IWASTHERE User ID: 59285928 Italy06/15/2014 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Eye Believe User ID: 46266987 United States06/15/2014 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It can be denied if you are referring to anything added to what is already there....which is every element in the periodic table. I have seen ZERO evidence that anything found in the air, associated with the trails in the sky, is anything more than the normal byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion and natural/normal particulates. I CERTAINLY deny that anything collected at ground level which has been claimed to come from the trails, is anything more that what should normally be found in the air collected at ground level. No one has proven otherwise...ever. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/15/2014 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are one dense shill. You are saying "chemtards" are going to kill everyone because you researched his Facebook page. No one said or cared about if you had a fb, I never said anyone was going to kill anyone because of a Facebook page. The point was he was an admitted Chemtard and he killed people. He wrote about it on his page. I made no other claim. And how does my information about Mr. Miller's Facebook page have less merit? He was a hateful Chemtard and a dangerous asshole. You Chemtards prove with every post that you are also dangerous. You make ignorant assumptions, you accuse people of things you cant possibly prove, you spread lies and fear as if they are established facts to people who are OBVIOUSLY already a bit on the crazy side...by any fucking standard! The man who made the article for Natural News has zero credentials, no background in the subject he's writing about, is obviously a conspiracy nut if he writes for Natural News! Not only that, he obviously has no concept about the fact that air is not just "air"! Our atmosphere has always been full of particulates! Everything we do creates "aerosols" and nature creates them everywhere, 24/7...consisting of everything on earth! It's all about the concentration! And so far, you Chemtards have failed to show that ANYTHING in our air is a problem! Nothing...zero...Nada! There is no evidence that anything in the trails in the sky is increasing the levels...OF ANYTHING in our air! Yet, you people accept it as truth and spread it as fact. And you don't have any idea how pathetic it is. Again, please continue. I appreciate the comedy and I'm glad your lives suck! And I will continue to post the truth regardless of what you losers want to believe! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49693944 United States06/15/2014 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It can be denied if you are referring to anything added to what is already there....which is every element in the periodic table. I have seen ZERO evidence that anything found in the air, associated with the trails in the sky, is anything more than the normal byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion and natural/normal particulates. I CERTAINLY deny that anything collected at ground level which has been claimed to come from the trails, is anything more that what should normally be found in the air collected at ground level. No one has proven otherwise...ever. Except for these. Shill: "oh yeah except for those (insert insult)....but those have nothing to do with anything....." [link to www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk] Quote from Oxford site: "Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth." But I suppose everyone at Oxford is delusional too. If it is added artificially.... and then it falls to the ground....then it would not be there normally....that is if you are remotely logical at all. I welcome your next emotional onslaught.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54614092 United States06/15/2014 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| wk User ID: 42088317 United States06/15/2014 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'll wear my new title with honor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49342655 As someone who has actually taken the time to learn about science and aviation through reputable sources with millions of man hours of research behind them (instead of accepting bullshit from conspiracy sites and calling it "research"), I'll accept the title with pride. Thank you paranoid and pathetic Chemtard for again proving your ignorance to the world...well, at least the very small portion of it who even knows this site, and your words, exist. [link to www.google.com (secure)] LMFAO, he never posts anything outside threads regarding chemtrails, I wonder why. No, you don't wonder why. You believe you know why. And you're wrong. This is a subject that I have studied my entire life. The rest of the paranoid nutjob shit from this site is of no interest to me. To believe that a person must have a varied interest is just fucking stupid. First of all, nobody would need to study this topic for thousands of hours to learn the truth. Whichever side is truth, it should only take a few hours of research....it is a limited topic. Second, I do believe that chemtrails are real and obvious, BUT, IF THEY WERE NOT, THEN WE WOULD STILL NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE SITUATION. IF REGULAR JETS ARE POLUTING THE AIR SO BADLY THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO TURN OUR BLUE DAYS INTO A SILVER HAZE, THEN WE STILL NEED TO DO SOMETHING. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW THAT KIND OF ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT I believe they are chemtrails, but if the denier is right, then we still need to put up a fight. I see them change the color. of our skies and that is not good. violet |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59043212  Canada06/15/2014 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no clouds though either I have come to suspect they were chemtrailing to try and weather modification moderate violent storms which were happening because of nature trying to compensate for the evil that men do everything seems to go bone dry so much fater than before even when it's cloudy and humid like the entire composition of water is becoming incompatible with all the chemical laced toxicity and without fair weather clouds because they we're killed off by the weather modification chemtrails we only get weather systems and cloudless days of unrelenting direct sunlight maybe I'm wrong whole thing seems stupid and more harmfull than good like stacking sin upon sin and running from the reprucussions until time runs out |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 52583283 United States06/15/2014 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1.) Ad hominem attacks are done only by those ignorant of epistemology. Ignorant being the key word there. 2.) Burden of proof (and epistemological concept) is with those making the claim. 3) Playing off the "argument from ignorance" fallacy is also epistemologically incorrect. I'm going to use a phrase that has been used in academia for years to refer to simpletons that believe it makes sense to get emotional and stubborn over things that haven't been proven: Epistemological dyspraxics. Learn what "logical fallacies" are, and then you can talk down to me. Until then, I will be looking down on you and your fluttering ignorance. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59274681  Uruguay06/15/2014 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1.) Ad hominem attacks are done only by those ignorant of epistemology. Ignorant being the key word there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52583283 2.) Burden of proof (and epistemological concept) is with those making the claim. 3) Playing off the "argument from ignorance" fallacy is also epistemologically incorrect. I'm going to use a phrase that has been used in academia for years to refer to simpletons that believe it makes sense to get emotional and stubborn over things that haven't been proven: Epistemological dyspraxics. Learn what "logical fallacies" are, and then you can talk down to me. Until then, I will be looking down on you and your fluttering ignorance. Is that straight out of your shill handbook? Trying to use big words to prove how smart you are. Why waste so much time and energy on proving something wrong, that you 100% believe does not exist? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24919026 United States06/15/2014 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49693944 United States06/16/2014 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59221930 United States06/16/2014 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49693944 United States06/16/2014 12:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the patent: [link to www.freepatentsonline.com] "One proposed solution to the problem of global warming involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude" Proposed oxides are aluminum and thorium and are said to remain in circulation for up to a year after dispersal. Yawn |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/16/2014 06:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It can be denied if you are referring to anything added to what is already there....which is every element in the periodic table. I have seen ZERO evidence that anything found in the air, associated with the trails in the sky, is anything more than the normal byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion and natural/normal particulates. I CERTAINLY deny that anything collected at ground level which has been claimed to come from the trails, is anything more that what should normally be found in the air collected at ground level. No one has proven otherwise...ever. Except for these. Shill: "oh yeah except for those (insert insult)....but those have nothing to do with anything....." [link to www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk] Quote from Oxford site: "Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth." But I suppose everyone at Oxford is delusional too. If it is added artificially.... and then it falls to the ground....then it would not be there normally....that is if you are remotely logical at all. I welcome your next emotional onslaught. Im sorry that you don't understand the word "proposal". There is no evidence that geoengineering has begun. So far, it's computer models only. Although, there could have been a small scale test or two to see how far a particular particulate can travel. But, this has nothing to do with the trails we see in the sky. In fact, there is nothing in any article or literature of any type that says geoengineering will look anything like persistent contrails or be distributed in long white trails that can last for hours. My post said SPECIFICALLY " associated with the trails" and all you have done is provide OPINION (ignorant opininion at that) that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. Sorry. As usual, you fail. At least you were able to somewhat predict my reply. You are almost becoming intelligent! |
| IWASTHERE User ID: 59309186 Italy06/16/2014 06:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dualda User ID: 33440527  Australia06/16/2014 06:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It can be denied if you are referring to anything added to what is already there....which is every element in the periodic table. I have seen ZERO evidence that anything found in the air, associated with the trails in the sky, is anything more than the normal byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion and natural/normal particulates. I CERTAINLY deny that anything collected at ground level which has been claimed to come from the trails, is anything more that what should normally be found in the air collected at ground level. No one has proven otherwise...ever. Except for these. Shill: "oh yeah except for those (insert insult)....but those have nothing to do with anything....." [link to www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk] Quote from Oxford site: "Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth." But I suppose everyone at Oxford is delusional too. If it is added artificially.... and then it falls to the ground....then it would not be there normally....that is if you are remotely logical at all. I welcome your next emotional onslaught. Im sorry that you don't understand the word "proposal". There is no evidence that geoengineering has begun. So far, it's computer models only. Although, there could have been a small scale test or two to see how far a particular particulate can travel. But, this has nothing to do with the trails we see in the sky. In fact, there is nothing in any article or literature of any type that says geoengineering will look anything like persistent contrails or be distributed in long white trails that can last for hours. My post said SPECIFICALLY " associated with the trails" and all you have done is provide OPINION (ignorant opininion at that) that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. Sorry. As usual, you fail. At least you were able to somewhat predict my reply. You are almost becoming intelligent! |
| HoovaDeuce82 User ID: 30570030 United States06/16/2014 06:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For those who have done the research, it's not even close. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56661566 So this thread is not about proving/disproving the existence of chemtrails. It's about humiliating those who deny the existence of chemtrails. I'll start. Chemtrail denier-tards are low IQ. Like, really really low IQ. They see the evidence, but still stick their thumb in their mouth. Denier-tards are often agents of the government, looking to spread disinfo and confuse the issues. They are, nonetheless, denier-tards. My question to the denier-tards is "what's it like to be so damn retarded, you can barely function to wipe your own butt?" Really. I'd like to know. 5* and pin!  Last Edited by HoovaDeuce82 on 06/16/2014 06:45 AM HoovaDeuce82 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/16/2014 06:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'll wear my new title with honor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49342655 As someone who has actually taken the time to learn about science and aviation through reputable sources with millions of man hours of research behind them (instead of accepting bullshit from conspiracy sites and calling it "research"), I'll accept the title with pride. Thank you paranoid and pathetic Chemtard for again proving your ignorance to the world...well, at least the very small portion of it who even knows this site, and your words, exist. [link to www.google.com (secure)] LMFAO, he never posts anything outside threads regarding chemtrails, I wonder why. No, you don't wonder why. You believe you know why. And you're wrong. This is a subject that I have studied my entire life. The rest of the paranoid nutjob shit from this site is of no interest to me. To believe that a person must have a varied interest is just fucking stupid. First of all, nobody would need to study this topic for thousands of hours to learn the truth. Whichever side is truth, it should only take a few hours of research....it is a limited topic. Second, I do believe that chemtrails are real and obvious, BUT, IF THEY WERE NOT, THEN WE WOULD STILL NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE SITUATION. IF REGULAR JETS ARE POLUTING THE AIR SO BADLY THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO TURN OUR BLUE DAYS INTO A SILVER HAZE, THEN WE STILL NEED TO DO SOMETHING. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW THAT KIND OF ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT I believe they are chemtrails, but if the denier is right, then we still need to put up a fight. I see them change the color. of our skies and that is not good. Idiot, there are many different parts of science and aviation to study. The trails are just a small part and you're right, it should just take a few hours, if that, to understand the trails in the sky. Whining about the trails online does nothing about he problem. You people need to start a campaign against the airlines. They have the ability to stop leaving persistent contrails but, it costs money...lots of it! And will result in much more fuel usage which the airlines will pass off to the customer with higher ticket prices. But, as I said, whining about it with other paranoid losers on conspiracy sites while shifting the blame from airlines to "geoengineerss" or Somme shadowy government entity will change absolutely nothing. You Chemtards are ineffective at stopping the trails. The only thing you people are good at is spreading ignorance. By the way, the white trails we see are nothing more than visual pollution. Of course airplanes pollute, as do all Sources of combustion....billions of them all around us at ground level. Why focus on the airplanes? Because of the trails? Decide what your issue is. If it's pollution, then you need to fight ALL sources. Why focus on aviation when commercial industries are polluting our water with millions of tons of pollution a year. If its the way the trails LOOK, then I suggest you and your Chemtard friends first take the time to learn what they are and who is responsible...because you certainly have no clue about that now! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/16/2014 06:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49342655 It can be denied if you are referring to anything added to what is already there....which is every element in the periodic table. I have seen ZERO evidence that anything found in the air, associated with the trails in the sky, is anything more than the normal byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion and natural/normal particulates. I CERTAINLY deny that anything collected at ground level which has been claimed to come from the trails, is anything more that what should normally be found in the air collected at ground level. No one has proven otherwise...ever. Except for these. Shill: "oh yeah except for those (insert insult)....but those have nothing to do with anything....." [link to www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk] Quote from Oxford site: "Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth." But I suppose everyone at Oxford is delusional too. If it is added artificially.... and then it falls to the ground....then it would not be there normally....that is if you are remotely logical at all. I welcome your next emotional onslaught. Im sorry that you don't understand the word "proposal". There is no evidence that geoengineering has begun. So far, it's computer models only. Although, there could have been a small scale test or two to see how far a particular particulate can travel. But, this has nothing to do with the trails we see in the sky. In fact, there is nothing in any article or literature of any type that says geoengineering will look anything like persistent contrails or be distributed in long white trails that can last for hours. My post said SPECIFICALLY " associated with the trails" and all you have done is provide OPINION (ignorant opininion at that) that the trails are in any way related to geoengineering. Sorry. As usual, you fail. At least you were able to somewhat predict my reply. You are almost becoming intelligent! And why do you believe her? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 United States06/16/2014 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| IWASTHERE User ID: 59309186 Italy06/16/2014 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anonymous Coward User ID: 49342655 Quoting: IWASTHERE Do you evwr get a break sometimes? Even at early morning really?  No breaks. Fighting ignorance is a fulltime job. I notice you are here as often as I am. Apparently, spreading ignorance is a fulltime job. Wash your dirty mouth before using that word, idiot. |
