If you would actually READ the information on the link, you will soon see very clearly why the sin was sexual. It is NOT POSSIBLE for God to say to Satan that he would put enmity between his SEED and her SEED, were he not speaking of actual offspring. What did eve say when Cain was born in the actual Hebrew? She dang sure didn't say he came from Adam, and she wasn't talking about The Lord Jesus either.

Then she did what? CONTINUED to give Birth to Able. She didn't say he was of Adam, Either. Why did God admonish Eve specifically against "eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, nor shall ye TOUCH it? That word "touch" in Hebrew means "to lie with" as in a sexual manner. It is used in many other places in scripture in exactly the same way, as is seed used almost exclusively to represent offspring.

The bible doesn't say Adam "BEGAT" anyone until Seth was born. What does Seth translate into? Substitute. For who? Why are both Cain and Able not in the genealogical record of Adam? Cain means "acquired". Is that what the firstborn son of Adam and Eve would be called in ANY universe? Acquired by whom? Able means "vanity", like he was an extra that wasn't needed or something. I suggest Ezekiel 31 for the true meaning of what the other "trees" in the garden were. How can a tree be envious? Or Faint? It even tells us how many different kinds of " trees" there were, and even that they were a different color from each other!

What is Song of Soloman referencing here in verses 2-3? "As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight , and his fruit was sweet to my taste."

Think she is speaking of eating actual fruit from her beloved's tree? Why did Jesus have to be born sexless, or of a virgin, and not have sex in his life at all, to be a pure and worthy sacrifice for mans ORIGINAL SIN, if it was NOT sexual in nature? When cains sacrifice to God was rejected and Cain asked why, why did God say " sin lies at the door"? Why wasn't Cain told or shown the proper sacrifice as Able seems to have been?

Enoch "walked with God". He was a truly righteous man and God took him before he died, as he did with Elijah. Only three men in the bible are said to have walked with God, Enoch, Noah and Abraham. Noah and Abraham are two of the most revered figures in Christendom, yet Enoch gets ONE SENTENCE in Genisis? How is that possible? Oh, that's right, Enoch wrote his own book and it was a major part of the holy book in Jesus' own time and all the days after, until the satanic Romans had it culled out at Nicea.

Jesus gets his two MOST IMPORTANT names from the book of Enoch, the "Son of Man" and the "tree of life", which were actually the first prophecies of the coming Christ. That Jesus CHOSE these names for himself shows he considered the book of Enoch authoritative, does it not? Is he not confirming the book as legitimate? There is NO other reason possible for Jesus to take those names. Does not the book of Enoch tell the true story of the garden? Do you not wonder at why is was taken from the bible at Nicea, yet the Ethiopian bible, which avoided the nicean council, she includes it as canon? I suggest anyone who has NOT read the book of Enoch, who walked with God and was holy, begat Methuselah who was a witness to the flood of Noah (which was only regional and NOT global, which is PROVEN in scripture. I will show you if you ask.) and lived for exactly 365 years, and then was taken before death because he pleased God. Time for God's Church to WAKE UP!