Stupid vivitar cameras and their fake optical zoom. | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59573097 United States 06/24/2014 02:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I done a little experimenting. There is six steps in the “optical zoom” range before you get to the digital zoom portion on the indicator. It is suppose to be 5X optical zoom. I pointed it at a set of tiles and zoomed in to the limit of the “optical zoom” range, it did appear to be 5X larger. All be it a lot more pixilated. So, now to the experimenting. I turned out most of the lights in the living room where I could see the hot pixels on the CCD. And mounted it on a tripod. Pointed it to a piece of electronic equipment at the other end that had a fait red status light that I could compare in relation to the location of the hot pixels I could see. From what I could tell first step is pure optical zoom. Second step is optical and digital zoom. Third step is pure optical zoom. Steps four, five, and six are a mix of optical and digital zoom. At step seven you enter the pure digital zoom range. On steps two, four, five, and six, you could see the hot CCD pixels move across the display screen and get larger. The hot pixels moved in relation to the stationary light in the view of the camera on all zoom steps. So there is real optical zoom there, but from what I can tell, it’s probably around an actual 2X real optical zoom. They get the other 3X by digital zooming while still in the optical zoom range. What gets me is how much thought, work, and design they put into such an idiotic idea. The designers at vivitar are awfully industrious idiots. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59589542 United States 06/24/2014 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15570612 United States 06/24/2014 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59573097 United States 06/24/2014 03:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | $100 is super cheap for a camera. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15570612 You should not really expect an awesome, high-quality camera for $100. I don’t expect an awesome high quality camera, but I also don’t expect the manufacturer to blatantly lie either. Just because it isn’t a 2000 dollar camera, doesn’t give them a pass at lying about a basic physical operating characteristic of that camera. Now if it was a 10 dollar camera at some street market that was made by a sweet shop in china and illegally smuggled into the US, then I should expect them to be lying about it’s capabilities. But for a camera made by a major manufacturer sold by almost every major retailer in the US to be intentionally fraudulently marketed, then NO I don’t expect that, even from a $20 camera. The industry standards for definitions of functionality in camera equipment is well established, so no manufacture, no mater how cheap the camera, gets a pass. If you applied that logic of yours to the lawn mower market, then the purchasers of the $1200 dollar riding mower should have expected to be lied too, because if he wanted good quality, he would have gotten a $5000 Dixie chopper. Monetary value of the product is no factor in the question of fraudulent advertising. It either is, or is not what the product is advertised as. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79909856 Sweden 06/10/2021 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71088931 United States 01/08/2023 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know the truth about your camera, you might be the only one. They will keep selling them and fooling people. They don’t care, because they don’t have to care. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79673900 Switzerland 01/08/2023 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |