|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
The impending arrival of the alien 'saviour'
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...The world population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050: [ link to www.census.gov] Also, you didn't include any links in your posts but you copied material from other sites... Quoting: ANHEDONIC Those numbers are based on faulty numbers or models always used to predict the future growth. Birth pangs on these end times accelerate matters beyond human prediction and will increase in magnitude and severity, and much life will be lost, all contrary to the "wise men who became fools", incredulous that their "computer models" are WRONG! Hold to worldly wisdom and so called "wise men". They will, too, behold the unfathomable wisdom of Almighty God. Wait a minute, you just copy & pasted information referencing ' UN Census Figures' to try and prove your claim - which you failed to do (see my other post)... Now you are saying my 'numbers' are 'faulty' and come from 'wrong' computer models generated by 'fools'? But the referenced UN figures/numbers you tried to use to support your claim are valid and made by wise men with 'right' computer models? Sorry OP, not buying this..... You made a false claim about something you didn't look into very closely and now you are not being intellectually honest... I was showing the PROGRESSION to the point where no flesh would be saved and whould so be SHORTENED. No, you made this claim: MORE ARE DYING THAN BEING BORN FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY! Quoting: Newton's Own When pressed for evidence of this, you could only post information for the U.S. which clearly said this only occurred in approximately 1,000 of the 3,000+ U.S. Counties and only over the period of 1 year! Your statement taken at face value was broad & generalized - and one in which it would only be logical to assume you intended to apply to the world population. You made not a present-tense assertion as to claim it was already transpiring - which it is not. The only honest thing to do here would be to admit you were mistaken... You still haven't addressed why the articles you link citing 'UN Census Figures' are valid yet when I reference the U.S. Census Bureau you make allegations of faulty numbers, wrong models made by fools. Are you saying the United Nations represents wise men using the correct numbers and right models? Please clarify. 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
