| Users Online Now: 2,164 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,533,431 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,225,785 | Threads Today: 609 | Posts Today: 12,332 |
| 06:03 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,164 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,533,431 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,225,785 | Threads Today: 609 | Posts Today: 12,332 |
| 06:03 PM | ||
The Root of the Problem. Who Really Controls International Terrorism? | |
| Aussie from Perth Offer Upgrade  User ID: 1488  Australia07/14/2006 07:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From 1995. A moment of reflection in light of the current drama. Bloody London. LaRouche on Israel's Bombing of Lebanon LEESBURG, Va., April 14, 1995 (EIRNS)--Democratic Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. issued the following statement today. Readers of the publications associated with my work as Contributing Editor for EIR News Service, will recall a recently reported comment by a U.S. State Department press spokesman. In that statement, the State Department deplored the suggestion that Middle East terrorism could be attributed to Britain, that ally with which the United States presumably has the closest sort of "special relationship." That State Department opinion was emitted under conditions that a continuing flood of evidence shows the authorship of Middle East terrorism against Israel to originate with organizations whose headquarters are in London. The State Department opinion is that Iran, rather than London, is the source of these attacks. Hence, since the U.S. State Department refuses to acknowledge the existence of the evidence pointing to London, the State Department implicitly instructs the government of Israel to bomb Lebanon areas indicated to be concentrations of Iran-based Hezbollah. Already, the government of Israel has found itself pressed to account for injuries which Israel's attacks have inflicted upon innocent Lebanese. Israel accuses Lebanon of being responsible, for reason of failing to have disarmed the Hezbollah. Why will Lebanon not disarm the Hezbollah? Because Syria's Hafez al-Assad will not allow the government of Lebanon to do so. In the meantime, Israel does less than nothing to stop the terrorist attacks at the source, London. Let all the guilty assume the blame they should. As a U.S. citizen, it is my moral responsibility to blame the State Department's role in, once again, covering up for the crimes of London, just as Secretary of State Christopher has covered up for London's continuing complicity in the Serbians' genocide and other atrocities in the Balkans. After all, London's geopolitical purpose in deploying terrorism against Israel's Peace Plan, is to shoot down every foreign-policy success of U.S. President Clinton; it is therefore all-too-logical, that certain State Department circles should assist London in Britain's effort to ruin President Clinton's policies. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 112333  United States07/14/2006 07:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 115577  United Kingdom07/14/2006 07:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Work it out if you can. |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 112333 United States07/14/2006 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When you get past London, the real root of the problem is that the people have no real interest in the Bible. They don't love truth. However, times seem to be changing and people are now actively searching for truth and finding it. The world needs a huge clean up job. |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 07:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  Worth looking out, ref link above to get to them. Northeast India: Target of British Apartheid Insurgent Groups in Northeast India Pakistan, Northwest India Insurgencies London Runs Cover for Terror in South India Southern India, Sri Lanka Terrorist Groups |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 115577 United Kingdom07/14/2006 07:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "London", Quoting: Aussie from PerthCity of London to be precise. The "Crown" is an tiny (occult/masonic) area in the City of London, so basically London as a city has very little to do with it since "The Crown" isn't even considered a part of England. It is owned by somebody else. |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 112333 United States07/14/2006 07:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 115870 United States07/14/2006 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "London", Quoting: Anonymous Coward 115577City of London to be precise. The "Crown" is an tiny (occult/masonic) area in the City of London, so basically London as a city has very little to do with it since "The Crown" isn't even considered a part of England. It is owned by somebody else. spill it, oh wise one. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5120 United States07/14/2006 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Put Britain on the List of States Sponsoring Terrorism The following memorandum, dated Jan. 11, 2000, was prepared for delivery to U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. It is a request to launch an investigation, pursuant to placing Great Britain on the list of states sponsoring terrorism. To: Hon. Madeleine Albright, Secretary of State From: The Editors, Executive Intelligence Review C.C.: Hon. William Cohen, Secretary of Defense Hon. Janet Reno, Attorney General Hon. George Tenet, Director of Central Intelligence Hon. Louis Freeh, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation Hon. Jesse Helms, Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hon. Joseph Biden, Ranking Democrat, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hon. Benjamin Gilman, Chairman, House International Relations Committee Hon. Sam Gejdenson, Ranking Democrat, House International Relations Committee This is a formal request for you to initiate a review of the role of the government of Great Britain in supporting international terrorism, to determine whether Britain should be added to the list of nations sanctioned by the United States government for lending support to international terrorist organizations. This issue has been recently highlighted, as the result of the December 1999 Indian Airlines hijacking, and the response of the British government to the request of one of the freed Kashmiri terrorists, Ahmed Omar Sheikh, to be given safe passage to England. Mr. Sheikh, a British national, was tried and convicted in India, for his role in the kidnapping of four British nationals and an American in 1995. He was sentenced to five years in prison in November 1998. Initially, the British government announced that it would provide Mr. Sheikh with safe passage to Britain, and would not prosecute him or make any effort to extradite him back to India. However, long before the Sheikh case, Executive Intelligence Review has documented a pattern of British involvement in harboring international terrorists, dating back to 1995. As of this writing, no fewer than a dozen governments—many of them leading allies of the United States—have filed formal diplomatic protests with the British Foreign Office, over specific instances of British official support for terrorist groups, targetting those nations. Criteria for evaluating whether Britain should be sanctioned [link to www.larouchepub.com] |
| Aussie from Perth (OP) User ID: 1488 Australia07/14/2006 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Note George Galloway below, keeping the dream alive for terror groups.. You know him, he dresses up as a cat.. here puss puss. Snip: ********************************* Groups banned by United States are headquartered in London ********************************* On Jan. 25, 1997, Tory Member of Parliament Nigel Waterson introduced legislation to ban foreign terrorists from operating on British soil. His "Conspiracy and Incitement Bill," according to his press release, would have for the first time banned British residents from plotting and conducting terrorist operations overseas. Waterson proposed the bill in the aftermath of a scandal over Britain providing safe haven for Saudi terrorist Mohammed al-Massari, who claimed credit for the bombing of U.S. military sites in Saudi Arabia in June 1996. On Feb. 14, 1997, Labour MP George Galloway succeeded in blocking Waterson's bill from getting out of committee. Galloway, in a speech before the committee that was printed in the House of Commons official proceedings, stated, "The Bill will change political asylum in this country in a profound and dangerous way. It will change a state of affairs that has existed since Napoleon's time. . . . We are all in favor of controlling terrorism in Britain. Surely not a single honorable Member has any truck with terrorism here, but we are talking about terrorism in other countries. . . . The legislation is rushed in response to a specific, and, for the government, highly embarrassing refugee case—that of Professor al-Massari, who was a thorn in the side of the government of Saudi Arabia. . . . By definition, a tyranny can be removed only by extraordinary measures. Inevitably, in conditions of extreme repression, the leadership of such movements will gravitate to countries such as ours where freedom and liberty prevail. The bill will criminalize such people, even though they have not broken any law in Britain or caused any harm to the Queen's peace in her realm. They will fall open to prosecution in this country under the Bill because they are inciting, supporting, or organizing events in distant tyrannies, which are clearly offenses under the laws of such tyrants. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15643 United States07/14/2006 08:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74048  India07/14/2006 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.larouchepub.com] Chávez organizes SPF's military wing by David Ramonet and Cynthia Rush The nation of Venezuela is a flashpoint for a new "Chiapas" on the Ibero-American continent, in which the Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200 (MBR-200), founded by Lt. Col. Hugo Chávez Frías (ret.), will play the leading role. In fact, the MBR-200 is a case study for how the São Paulo Forum is retreading itself continentally. In the December 1993 Presidential elections, the Forum's affiliated Radical Cause (Causa R) party failed miserably in its efforts to defeat Rafael Caldera. While Causa R maintains a facade of promoting the electoral route, the MBR-200 is actively pursuing the path of armed revolt. All the elements for Venezuela's destabilization are present: There is a direct British role in the attempt to overthrow President Caldera, using the still-intact political apparatus of deposed former President Carlos Andrés Pérez, as well as organized financial warfare executed through house organs of British economic policy, including the Wall Street Journal, the London Financial Times, and the London Economist. The latter publication insultingly refers to Caldera as a "cockroach." |
