were both shots to Michael browns head after he was down!? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30355610 Canada 08/19/2014 06:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
REDSKINS RULE (OP) User ID: 25705834 United States 08/19/2014 07:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ever had someone charge at you trying to maybe kill you? Were they 300lbs and black? come see me after that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30355610 yeah well he was thirty ft away. because a guy is big doen't mean I'm scared. go ahead justify this in your mind That is exactly what's wrong with this world. people think if the shooting is justified then that it's OK to kill someone. Well let me explain to you that killing people for any reason is not ok. There will be consequenses to the shooter his family his friends to the person who has been shot or killed his family and various other people associated with the incident. So go right ahead and shoot be my guest. REDSKINS RULE Hail To the redskins. Oh and you can call me pale face. Because people have always used color as a way to help someone understand who or what they are talking about. I was born a Pale face but I'M A REDSKIN BY CHOICE! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49575588 United States 08/19/2014 07:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As an aside, average person in such a confrontation can cover a distance of 21 feet in 1.5 seconds. Google tueller drill and read about it. That's not much time to make a decision. |
REDSKINS RULE (OP) User ID: 25705834 United States 08/19/2014 07:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't see how both head shots could have occurred after he was down. If you look at the diagrams from the autopsy, in order for that to have happened, the cop would have had to literally lie on his stomach to shoot. Quoting: filth As an aside, average person in such a confrontation can cover a distance of 21 feet in 1.5 seconds. Google tueller drill and read about it. That's not much time to make a decision. none of the winesses said he was charging. All said he had put his head up and said don't shoot. REDSKINS RULE Hail To the redskins. Oh and you can call me pale face. Because people have always used color as a way to help someone understand who or what they are talking about. I was born a Pale face but I'M A REDSKIN BY CHOICE! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59791446 United States 08/19/2014 07:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't see how both head shots could have occurred after he was down. If you look at the diagrams from the autopsy, in order for that to have happened, the cop would have had to literally lie on his stomach to shoot. Quoting: filth As an aside, average person in such a confrontation can cover a distance of 21 feet in 1.5 seconds. Google tueller drill and read about it. That's not much time to make a decision. none of the winesses said he was charging. All said he had put his head up and said don't shoot. More than a dozen witnesses have given statements that are on par with the cops version of events. Case closed the cop is vindicated. [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55292004 United States 08/19/2014 07:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The cop shot him as Michael was facing him. So the story that Michael was fleeing is a lie. His back wasn't turned. This was not an execution. The cop was defending himself. Michael was ruffing him up and cursing at the cop moment before. Being a real social misfit asshole. It cost him his life. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58190114 United States 08/19/2014 07:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you are 6'4 and the officer isn't 7' tall...the ONLY way that shot could have happened is if Brown was on his knees with his head drooped/hung. There is a better chance of winning the lottery 3x over than accidentally shooting someone in a direct line through the top of the head as the were falling forward. Even if he was rushing towards him with his head lowered...due to his height, that shot would have exited the back of his head. |
REDSKINS RULE (OP) User ID: 25705834 United States 08/19/2014 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't see how both head shots could have occurred after he was down. If you look at the diagrams from the autopsy, in order for that to have happened, the cop would have had to literally lie on his stomach to shoot. Quoting: filth As an aside, average person in such a confrontation can cover a distance of 21 feet in 1.5 seconds. Google tueller drill and read about it. That's not much time to make a decision. none of the winesses said he was charging. All said he had put his head up and said don't shoot. More than a dozen witnesses have given statements that are on par with the cops version of events. Case closed the cop is vindicated. [link to twitter.com (secure)] Why do you insist on vindicating someone before all the facts have been examined. Basically if just 1 shot is uncalled for he has committed homicide. So We'll all have to wait until this goes through the court system to learn if he;s vindicated or not. REDSKINS RULE Hail To the redskins. Oh and you can call me pale face. Because people have always used color as a way to help someone understand who or what they are talking about. I was born a Pale face but I'M A REDSKIN BY CHOICE! |
Sledster User ID: 40297908 Germany 08/19/2014 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't see how both head shots could have occurred after he was down. If you look at the diagrams from the autopsy, in order for that to have happened, the cop would have had to literally lie on his stomach to shoot. Quoting: filth As an aside, average person in such a confrontation can cover a distance of 21 feet in 1.5 seconds. Google tueller drill and read about it. That's not much time to make a decision. none of the winesses said he was charging. All said he had put his head up and said don't shoot. More than a dozen witnesses have given statements that are on par with the cops version of events. Case closed the cop is vindicated. [link to twitter.com (secure)] Why do you insist on vindicating someone before all the facts have been examined. Basically if just 1 shot is uncalled for he has committed homicide. So We'll all have to wait until this goes through the court system to learn if he;s vindicated or not. Why do you insist on incriminating the cop before all the evidence is in? All I'm hearing from you is what the "witnesses" said. Believe it or not the witnesses may not be telling the truth. Hell, the witnesses may not have even seen what happened. I don't know whose fuckup this thing was, only that it is affecting a whole lot of people and I for one am not going to get on the lynching bandwagon just yet. I'm tired of waiting, somebody push the damn button already! Keep your 72 virgins, give me one old biker chick. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61157393 United States 08/19/2014 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The first bullet is all that matters. If it was anywhere in the front then the cop is justified. If you haven't had to stop someone from attacking you then you have no right to comment. I've had to shoot a few people in the Gulf War and I'm here to say that you don't remember it. All you know is the moment where you must shoot or die. The men I killed likely had three shots to the chest but for all I know could have had ten. Either way, my intent was to kill the fucker dead so he did not kill me. End of story. |