We need to make sure that the term "debunking" is used properly. Since the official 9/11 story is clearly full of bunk, the term "debunkers" is properly applied to those who criticize the official version. Advocates of the official story are not "debunkers." They are apologists. This is a very important distinction.

The same is true of the term "skeptics." Apologists such as Michael Shermer and other notable "skeptics" are no such thing when it comes to the 9/11 issue. The 9/11 truth movement are the skeptics.

The apologists should not be allowed to control the language, particulary when they are blatantly abusing it.