Jesus was a leftist peacenik

Jesus had no problem kicking ass when ass needed kicking.

I know. I'm sure if he were here today, the first asses he would kick would be those of the modern Pharisee Christians.

Jesus loved peace. That doesn't mean he wasn't able to call out the hypocrites and vipers making false claims to spirituality.

How could you possibly know anything about Jesus?

You constantly mock him.

It is absurd for you to think you could. Why do you bother?

Quit lying. I don't mock Jesus, I mock Christians. There is a world of difference.

Jesus was not a Christian, and neither am I. You are clearly the one who knows nothing about Jesus, if you think he would have anything to do with this hypocritical mob that is currently soiling his name.

Who do YOU say Jesus Christ is?

... well, jeremiah was a bull-frog..

An ancient Jewish reformer who spoke against selfishness, materialism, and hypocrisy.

Likely Jesus was one of the original architects of modern globalism.

You are correct. The only people he ever showed violence were the money changers. He threw them out of the temple.

If he were here, he would be tending to the wounds of children in Iraq, helping people in Africa get water, and eating with the homeless.

He would NOT be dining with the president.

Right on.

By the way, have you read the Bible?

John 20:27-29 "Then he said to Thomas, 'Put your finger here and see my hands. Put your hand into the wound in my side. Don't be faithless any longer. Believe!' 'My Lord and my God!' Thomas exclaimed. Then Jesus told him, 'You believe because you have seen me. Blessed are those who haven't seen me and believe anyway.'" NLT

John 11:25-26 "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" NIV

Now I would like to agree with mr. Naturyl about christianity and with Kay about what mr. Naturyl knows about jesus because their source for their knowledge of Jesus is the same...even though their interpretations are different...

The problem with this from my point of view is that the source is distorted, unreliable and basically fabricated.

Just like many of the 'pagan' messiah myths that were 'taken up' to program a following this was tried after the murder of the being Jesus...to greater sucess than all the previous attempts.


He/She is a being, consciousness that can only be known through inner connection to his/her energy and Light.

She/He is not confined to time/space so he/she can be 'contacted' at anytime whether in a body or no.

She/He is now in a body.

He/She is certainly not here to save the christians which are no 'kin' to Him/Her

Natural dood ... I have come to know u over the last few days as :


ONE COOL DOOD


Keep up the good work Warrior.

>>>Jesus was a leftist peacenik<<<


Yeah, yeah, c'mon boys. Let's get hiiimmm!!!!

Jesus died for everyone, not just the Christians.

So you deny He is who He said He is.

This is a romantization...

That was/is a job for humanity to take care of ...

Jesus is not interested in the physical but the spiritual and how to get his/her children out of it.

Of course suffering of others is not in his nature. But the problem is the evil that allows and profits energetially by such suffering.

And freeing the Children of the Light from this evil kingdom is His/Her task.

Jesus was murdered by those ,the same essense and energy, that came to write control and edit the N.T. and O.T.

jesus ain't here now boys and girls. kinda like santa.

=natural

=Kay

=Me

Jesus is right here with me. I can close my eyes and see him.

The actual question from your point of view must be:

So you deny He is who the bible says He said He is.

Then we can safely answer : YES

To deny who he/she says they are would be to deny Jesus.

But to deny that book of Lies and distortions is an exercise in Freedom of thought and 'Truth Sense'

If he was alive today, the right wing might very vell call him that. Just an opinion, but I think Jesus would be opposed to war.

It is amazing how the politicians that profess they follow Jesus's teachings, are so quick to go to war.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Amen !
Just look at Kay, the so-called "Christian"
she creams over the thought of "Armageddon" starting.
Sick and twisted.


Mr N, keep up the good work

Kay is a really twisted weirdo. No brain, no character, no use to the world.

Well, seeing that Christ died for His Church, that the Church is the body of Christ and He is the head, then I don't really see how you could possibly mock and denigrate the institution that He cherishes so.

He said his entire purpose was to build the church, that the 'gates of hell wouldn't prevail against it'.

So, let's see, do I believe Jesus or do I believe you?

I have already proven that the Christian Church has been a major force of good in the world since it's inception. Polygamy was banned in the Christian Church since Paul's letters to Timothy and Titus.

I proved that the abolition of slavery, the right for women to vote, the civil rights movement - all these came directly from the Christian Church.

I did not mention that Florence Nightingale was a devout Christian, and she is the author of modern nursing.

Here is here bio from wikipedia:

Florence Nightingale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Florence Nightingale was born into a wealthy and well-connected British family at the Villa Colombaia in Florence, Italy. She was named after the city of her birth, as was her older sister (named Parthenope, the Greek name for the city of Naples).

Inspired by what she understood to be a divine calling (first experienced in 1837 at the age of 17 at Embley Park and later throughout her life), Nightingale made a commitment to nursing. This decision demonstrated a strong will on her part; it constituted a rebellion against the expected role for a woman of her status, which was to become an obedient wife. At the time, nursing was a career with a poor reputation, filled mostly by poorer women, "hangers-on" who followed the armies; they were equally likely to function as cooks. Nightingale would announce her decision to enter nursing to her family in 1845, evoking intense anger and distress from her family, particularly her mother.

Nightingale was particularly concerned with the appalling conditions of medical care for the legions of the poor and indigent. In December 1844, in response to a pauper's death in a workhouse infirmary in London that became a public scandal, she became the leading advocate for improved medical care in the infirmaries and immediately engaged the support of Charles Villiers, then president of the Poor Law Board. This led to her active role in the reform of the Poor Laws, extending far beyond the provision of medical care.

In 1846 she visited Kaiserswerth, Germany, and learned more of its pioneering hospital established by Theodor Fliedner and managed by an order of Lutheran deaconesses. She was greatly impressed by the quality of medical care and by the commitment and practices of the deaconesses.

==================

Look at that! At the age of 17, she realized she had a DIVINE CALLING, and went out to study with LUTHERAN DEACONNESSES.

So, here we have more proof that social progress has always been associated with THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.

Not to mention our UNIVERSITY SYSTEM! One cannot help but note that prior to the state college, the entire upper level learning system was solely established by churches.

So, please don't try to say, "Oh the horrible terrible Christian church" That is utterly ridiculous.

Your problem is you are BLIND.

Oh, I forgot too, my son reminded me that the modern 'HOSPITAL' is entirely created by the Christian Church as well. And he said that our ORPHANAGES were created by the Christian Church.

Before Christianity, there was no such thing as an orphanage.

Kay, *You* are "utterly ridiculous"

and that's putting it kindly.


:clogic: