Doom Porn 42 day ebola incubation period

This is my first thread here on GLP, been lurking for awhile and thought I'd jump aboard.

With that out of the way I'd like to clarify that Ebola does not have a 42 day incubation period, although it does take 42 days for the cycle of a disease such as this to be broken, which would be double the incubation period in order for humans to develop Ebola, and exactly what the author
is denoting.

The recent article being circulated via WND completely takes the entire Ebola incubation period out of context. ( Sorry for not posting a link to article, haven't figured it out yet) however, as l posted in a recent thread here, the WHO article which is the source for this material doesn't imply there is a 42 day incubation period, although if the material isn't being viewed in the scope of the title, it would be easy to misconstrue the message.

The subject of the article from who is whether or not the pandemic is over or if their in the clear, he says not yet. When he begins to extrapolate his thoughts he says 95% show symptoms in 2-21 days, 98% show symptoms in a 42 day period.

Now it'd be easy to look at it and say,"WOW , a 42 day incubation period, they've being lying," when in fact it implies no such thing.

So what does in mean in the scope of it's entirety, it means that in order for the cycle to be broken 42 days must transpire for the pandemic to be declared over.

Now, the 95% are those infected during the 21 day incubation period, the 98% being referenced isn't an elongated period but, the percentage of the 95% that show symptoms within the 42 day window or cycle that must transpire in order for the pandemic to declared over. So in other words there is no 42 incubation period, it's merely referencing the percentage of cases that fall between the the two cycles.

Second line