OFFICIAL NASA VIDEO ADMITS To NEVER SENDING PEOPLE TO THE MOON

"The researchers discovered that the tapes containing the raw unprocessed Apollo 11 SSTV signal were erased and reused by NASA in the early 1980s. This was according to NASA's procedures, as they were facing a major data tape shortage at that time." more on the link below.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

okay.. apollo 11 landing, the most important event in our human mankind's time and nasa gotta erase+reused THAT particular tape? come on, nasa got like millions or perhaps billions of dollars by government/companies/whatever...? come on, they (nasa) would afford TO PERSERVE just one but very important tape... something's fishy with that.

5 star thread.
Thanks to all participants...even them shills. Lol

X-Ray ..... Period.
X-Ray to death.

Astro can choke on it. So can nasa.

I just had a discussion with a gaggle of rocket riders over on a forum they operate as a trap and wack , and they weren't aware of this. In fact they seemed to be totally ignorant to the reality that we now now orders of magnitude more about space weather and radiation then we did in 1969.

When I first began investigating the possibilities of a the moon landings being a hoax, i was unconvinced. What made me most suspicious to be honest was the way these people defended their positions, exactly like a guilty criminal defends his innocence.


They will never admit it was a hoax, even when the supposed landing sites are proved to be devoid of human activity.

I am convinced they see preserving this lie as critical. They are spending millions on propaganda every year to defend Apollo.

What I don't see is how they believe they can do it much longer.Unless the human race is plunged into a new dark age, exposure of the hoax is inevitable, because to be blunt at this point in history the Apollo moonlandings appear to more of badly written sci fi movie than reality. The claims made by NASA are simply impossible and incredible. Granted, you need to be somewhat knowledgeable to understand why, but billions are.

I believe people have comfort zones they are unwilling to leave, and many know Apollo wasn't real but will never admit it to themselves, it has just been accepted as a historical fact like the holohoax or Texicans winning the battle of the Alamo. It's a sort of denial that is hard to cure, history is nothing more or less than an agreed upon lie by those who write it..

Exposing NASA's Fake Moon Landings

Lying To The World For 45 Years

[link to www.nasamoonhoax.com]

Speaking of writing...where's your 1300 page book?

And as the Apollo Landing sites are photographed by other countries in the near future, and the Apollo remnants are shown to be there, will you admit you are wrong, or merely move the goalposts that equipment was put up there just to 'stage' the landings?

I don't see the post you're quoting. Was it on another thread or something like that? FWIW I don't think the presence of equipment would prove it, after all Russia has junk up there too. I think what would prove it would be a rover sent to the moon to survey the sites. I don't think it would cost much either, compared to what they spend on people like you.
Just let anyone that wants to receive the signals. I think that would put it to rest for good (I'm sure it would)

And I also think the reason it hasn't been done is because there isn't any evidence of human activity like footprints on the moon anywhere. 46 years after the fact and still this debate goes on.
I take it you do believe it?

Well, Pt Barnum had it right when he said there's a sucker born every minute.

TLDR the point is they hoaxed the moon landings before they knew the van allen radiation belt was there? This means they couldnt have gone to the moon or they'd be dead?

I don't see the post you're quoting. Was it on another thread or something like that?

FWIW I don't think the presence of equipment would prove it, after all Russia has junk up there too. I think what would prove it would be a rover sent to the moon to survey the sites.

I don't think it would cost much either, compared to what they spend on people like you.

Just let anyone that wants to receive the signals. I think that would put it to rest for good (I'm sure it would)

And I also think the reason it hasn't been done is because there isn't any evidence of human activity like footprints on the moon anywhere. 46 years after the fact and still this debate goes on.
I take it you do believe it?

Well, Pt Barnum had it right when he said there's a sucker born every minute.