|
REPORT ABUSIVE MESSAGE
|
|
Subject
|
Montana School System Wants Sex Education for Kindergarten
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
[ link to www.americantraditions.org] Recently, sex education in Montana was in the news. The following is from the article, Montana School System Wants Sex Education for Kindergarten[3], by Bruce Walker:
Jeff Laszloffy, president of the Montana Family Council, has expressed outrage at a plan being considered by the Helena Public School System to have sex education begin in kindergarten.
These young children will [be] taught the meaning of terms like nipple, penis, uterus, and scrotum. The next year, first-graders would be taught that homosexual attraction is normal. By the time the students are ten, they would be taught that “sexual intercourse includes but is not limited to vaginal, oral, or anal penetration.” ...
Second-graders are taught to “Understand that calling people gay … is disrespectful and hurtful.” Language used to describe homosexuality is consciously controlled by the schools. Third-graders are taught: “The media often presents an unrealistic image of what it means to be male or female.” Children are also taught in that grade that moral values are not universal. The Helena Public School intends to re-educate young children about what being boys or girls means and to deconstruct the moral values these children have learned.
In an interview on the Montana sex education, Dr. Judith A. Reisman states[4]:
Montana is seeking to impose an unscientific, Kinseyan ideological model of pathological sexual instruction on the undeveloped, immature brains of vulnerable children. I would argue that the exposure of children to the kinds of sexual stimuli proposed by Montana's education mavens reflects unmitigated ignorance, malevolence or both. Their imposition of sexplicit and indeed deviant forms of sexual conduct on captive schoolchildren is institutional child sexual abuse. Were a man or woman to stop a child on the street and whisper the same information teachers will force on these school children, he or she could be arrested for child molestation. Thus yes, the sexual stimuli "education" planned is unmonitored, untested, not validated and on the evidence provably traumatic for normal child development. ...
Well, just what makes these sexperts sexperts? How do they get their training, where? Since sex education only existed as "hygiene" before 1950, (cleanliness habits and instruction to wait until marriage for sex unless one wanted to get VD) all sex ed had to come from some "expert." That "expert" was Alfred Kinsey and his books Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953) launched the "field" and the sex ed curricula the Montana folks would like to bring to classrooms today. Since all of the Kinsey data were lies, based on sex abuse of hundreds, even thousands of children (young as 2 months) the entire "field" is based on lies and crimes against children. And the field denies it--so ask where they were trained, by whom--their sexperts will all come down to being Kinseyans. This is the biggest con job on American education in history
In the recent news we learned some of the details on sex education in Massachusetts. Dr. Reisman, in the article, Massachusetts Schools are Giving First Grade Children Condoms, Why Exactly?[5], had this to say:
Copying the pedophile model, Massachusetts schools are giving first grade children condoms, violating parental protections.
In 1977 the pedophile CHILDHOOD SENSUALITY CIRCLE (CSC) published a "Child's Sexual Bill of Rights" -- truly a "Pedophile's Bill of Rights."
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
