Russian Chess master Kasparov likens Putin to Hitler, urges west to act

Garry Vaynshteyn
[link to www.jewornotjew.com]

Everybody's Hitler to these silly freaks.

shillbot strikes

I guess you weren't surprised to find out Gary's kosher, were you.

Everyone knows there cant be another world conventional war.
After the invention of nuclear weapons, total war will never be the same again.

This from a devilish looking cheating chess master who is sponsored by the agency and has us citizenship.

The same can be said for many inventions down the ages... the use of Chemical weapons in WW1 lead to the development of other WMDs in the inter war years and yet, even though those WMDs where weaponised, with delivery platforms and troops ready to use them they where never deployed for fear, yes, fear where that would lead, not even the Nazis wanted to walk that path..

So I am sorry to say but while you are right in that war will never be the same, that does not mean total war will be waged... even with such weapons there are lines some wont cross simply for good old human self preservation..

Take the Japanese, weaponised the plague yet they would only use such weapons on "lesser" people in China, never against the allies again for fear that would be a line to far...

Kasprov is a weasel

Ill ignore your insanity...but why do you say he's a cheater?

The Great Conspiracy Against Russia: What is Really Behind the Campaign Against Putin?

November 15, 2014
By DR KR BOLTON

When the war-drums start beating in Washington against a state or statesman, one is entitled to wonder what transgression might have been made against the ‘New World Order’. Over the past few decades we have seen one nation after another succumb to either financial blandishments, or when those fail, long-planned, well-funded ‘spontaneous’ colour revolutions, and as a last resort bombs. The states of the ex-Soviet bloc largely succumbed to ‘colour revolutions’ orchestrated by the Soros network, aligned with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USAID and a host of other funds and NGOs.

Milosevic’s Serbia, Qadhafi’s Libya and Saddam’s Iraq were bombed into submission, with ground support for jihadists. The globalists have no objection to jihadists when they serve to keep the world in a state of ‘constant conflict’, in accordance with globalist aims. The USA will use ‘Islamists’ where they can, both as dupes and bogeymen.

There is one major spanner in the world: Russia – again. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been vilified relentlessly from the start of his leadership of Russia. A second ‘Cold War’ followed so soon in the aftermath of the first that the two can be regarded as one.
Russia Stymied World State

There was a fleeting interregnum when it looked as though Russia would finally succumb to globalisation. This encompassed the Yeltsin years, however it was prepared while the Communist Party still held power, during the Gorbachev era. The sudden implosion of the mighty Soviet edifice, seemingly overnight, was long prepared by a combination of US-based subversion, backing ‘dissidents’ such as Solidarity in Poland, coupled with a planned scuttle by Gorbachev, who envisioned himself as an internationally-feted globalist celebrity.

Russia had succumbed to the nexus of money and revolution in 1917. The revolutionary movement had been well funded since 1905 when the anti-Tsarist journalist George Kennan was sent over to Japan to propagandise Russian POWs, with funds from Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Wall Street. Kennan remarked that 50,000 revolutionary cadres were sent back to Tsarist Russia. Schiff’s contribution to the overthrow of the Tsar was lauded in New York in March 1917.1 There quickly followed the Bolshevik coup led by Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin was backed by the Germans to get Russia out of the war, and Trotsky was backed by the Americans and British to keep Russia in the war. Trotsky was in close association with R. H. Bruce Lockhart, British War Cabinet special agent in Russia, to such an extent that Lockhart’s wife commented that many of his colleagues quipped he was turning Bolshevik. The lines were drawn when Trotsky resigned as minister of foreign affairs because of Lenin’s insistence that Russia sign an armistice with Germany.2

After the war, there was a scramble by international finance to get concessions from the Soviets, at a time when their existence was very precarious at best, and the American ‘intervention’ under General Graves was doing its best to backstab the White Armies in favour of the Reds.3 H. Wickham Steed, editor of The London Times, observed at the Paris Peace Conference that it was the international financiers such as Schiff who were pushing for worldwide recognition of the Bolsheviks.4 Matters proceeded well for international capitalism under the regime of Lenin and Trotsky. Russia opened up to foreign capital and technology. With Lenin’s death and the resulting power struggle, Stalin eliminated the influence of Trotsky and his coterie in 1928.

The common fight against the Axis in the Second World War opened up a further opportunity for the USSR to be brought into a world order. The USA proposed such a world state via the United Nations General Assembly as a world parliament. The USSR recognised that the USA would control any such parliamentary vote, and insisted that authority be vested in the Security Council with the right of veto for permanent members. The second premise for a post-war new world order rested with the US proposal to ‘internationalise’ atomic energy under United Nations aegis, outlined in the ‘Baruch Plan’, named after Bernard M. Baruch, so-called ‘elder statesman’ of the USA. Again, the USSR said no.5

The USSR alone prevented the creation of a world state. The conservative Right remains confused about Russia till today, and much of it continues the old Cold War anti-Russia line against Putin who, to them, is the new Stalin.

Continue to read:
[link to www.newdawnmagazine.com]

Hmmm looks like OP is another American jew, just like the chess geek

Kasparow is obviously working for the West and on a mission to destabilze and destroy Russia..

An anti-jew, anti-intellectual? What a shocker!

Blah blah blah.. I dont care about your political views. I asked why you called him a cheater.

Kasparow is more of an anti-christ than putin for sure.

Putin, like Obolo has gone full psycho. Something apparently snapped in him.

Pretty much everyone who ascends to such a position is a sociopath, narcissist, and constantly on the edge between almost sane and full psycho.

Every country in the world is plagued with the same shit, except Uruguay where the President is amazingly normal.

Blah blah blah.. I dont care about your political views. I asked why you called him a cheater.

Google it, moron.

Creepy.

[link to t2.gstatic.com]

Putin's an old joke now ppl. I dead meme. Stop embarrassing yourselves pretending it's still going. He's been slapped repeatedly and shown to be a hypocrite and likely dictator too many times with his actions.

Just drop it. He's just Russia's Obama, Merkel, Cameron etc etc.

So chess master Kasparov is another warmonger pushing the war agenda?

yup... What a lame sack of shit.

Russia's Obama

Cant back up your statement?

looks like he should go back to playing chess, seems to be all he's good at

If Putin is playing the role of Hitler, who is playing the role of Chamberlain and appeasement.... wow that is not a difficult one now is it...

ObeeOne and the force of appeasement...

This is what Orwell wrote about Chamberlain as German bombers where bombing London..

Extract from England Your England..

"His opponents professed to see in him a dark and wily schemer, plotting to sell England to Hitler, but it is far likelier that he was merely a stupid old man doing his best according to his very dim lights. It is difficult otherwise to explain the contradictions of his policy, his failure to grasp any of the courses that were open to him. Like the mass of the people, he did not want to pay the price either of peace or of war. And public opinion was behind him all the while, in policies that were completely incompatible with one another. It was behind him when he went to Munich, when he tried to come to an understanding with Russia, when he gave the guarantee to Poland, when he honoured it, and when he prosecuted the war half-heartedly.

Only when the results of his policy became apparent did it turn against him; which is to say that it turned against its own lethargy of the past seven years. Thereupon the people picked a leader nearer to their mood, Churchill, who was at any rate able to grasp that wars are not won without fighting. Later, perhaps, they will pick another leader who can grasp that only Socialist nations can fight effectively.

I sit here not thinking who ObeeOne will sell the West to but who will replace him in the way Churchil replaced Chamberlain as each day goes on that moment gets closer..

Kasparov is an Illuminati asset. I don't believe a word he says. Also, Hitler wasn't who the masses believe him to be (due to TPTB brainwashing). Go do some actual research into World War II, and you'll see that comparing Putin to Hitler is actually high praise.

So would you tell Putin that to his face that you are praising him when you say he is like Hitler.

Um....we WANT another Hitler. Who else is going to remove the tumors?

[link to chess.stackexchange.com]