Barack Obama: I Have A “Moral Obligation” To Neuter America | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5845318 ![]() 11/25/2014 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads. Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500. Quoting: Slack-fisted Doom-browser Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama. He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads. [link to endoftheamericandream.com] [link to prntscr.com] all part of a master plan - not hard to see what is going on |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33435073 ![]() 11/25/2014 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Many out there claim that even if the U.S. only has a few hundred nuclear warheads that it will be more than enough to be an effective deterrent. Sadly, that simply is not true. If an enemy knows that we only have a few hundred warheads, and if they know exactly where those warheads are located for verification purposes, then a first strike which would take out the vast majority of our operational warheads becomes very plausible. That is why what Obama wants to do is so incredibly dangerous. If he reduces our strategic nuclear arsenal down to almost nothing, the odds of a nuclear first strike against the United States someday go up dramatically. ' you people better take this seriously... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65295582 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
M*walk Low Earth Orbit User ID: 9652994 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:01 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BIBLE VERSE SHOWING THE ANTICHRIST DISASSEMBLING OUR MILITARY. 5Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river. 6And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders? 7And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished. 8And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? 9And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. 11And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. 13But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48165599 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BIBLE VERSE SHOWING THE ANTICHRIST DISASSEMBLING OUR MILITARY. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64673642 5Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river. 6And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders? 7And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished. 8And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? 9And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. 11And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. 13But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days. ![]() This isn't the 60's anymore, we've got weapons that do more damage than what a nuclear weapon could ever do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56681215 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads. Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500. Quoting: Slack-fisted Doom-browser Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama. He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads. [link to endoftheamericandream.com] [link to prntscr.com] if 300 nuclear warheads were to explode in this world there will be no world left. the planet will still be here but the 'world' will not (at least for several thousand years anyways). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26116340 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 57285096 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61521571 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads. Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500. Quoting: Slack-fisted Doom-browser Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama. He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads. [link to endoftheamericandream.com] [link to prntscr.com] if 300 nuclear warheads were to explode in this world there will be no world left. the planet will still be here but the 'world' will not (at least for several thousand years anyways). ^This. I'm no fan of O, and am not in favor of depleting our military power by any means, but 300 nukes (not counting what would be fired in return) would be enough to wipe us all out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65489495 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Voice In The Wilderness User ID: 46971740 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2312772 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From biblegateway.com Zechariah 11:15 Then the Lord said to me, “Take again the equipment of a foolish shepherd. 16 For I am going to raise up a shepherd over the land who will not care for the lost, or seek the young, or heal the injured, or feed the healthy, but will eat the meat of the choice sheep, tearing off their hooves. 17 “Woe to the worthless shepherd, who deserts the flock! May the sword strike his arm and his right eye! May his arm be completely withered, his right eye totally blinded!” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64673642 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lamplite User ID: 50546112 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It won't be long before we learn there never was any nukes it was all just magnesium flash bombs and bullshit. They fire bombed the Japanese cities . You really think they just somehow managed not to have one go off in the past what 60 years or so? Thread: Do NUCLEAR BOMBS really exist or are they simply a bomb with a great VISUAL EFFECT, made for propaganda reasons and to scare you silly? Last Edited by Lamplite on 11/25/2014 01:53 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65251101 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48165599 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The bible does say the Antichrist will scatter the Power of God's holy people! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64673642 And looking at the state of the American society as a whole, you truly see this country as 'holy'? Have people completely lost their minds? No one on this planet is "holy" and to claim any nation is is fucking insane. |
I HAVE QUESTIONS User ID: 65158463 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads. Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500. Quoting: Slack-fisted Doom-browser Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama. He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads. [link to endoftheamericandream.com] [link to prntscr.com] if 300 nuclear warheads were to explode in this world there will be no world left. the planet will still be here but the 'world' will not (at least for several thousand years anyways). the cont. US could absorb 300 nuclear strikes and still be a survivable terrain. illumination "peanut butter jelly time!! peanut butter jelly time!! peanut butter jelly time!!" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59945665 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2312772 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What a bunch of tards. Look up how many nukes were tested in the Nevada desert. The world would survive at the 3,500+3500 response level. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59945665 The whole US nuclear testing program was a luciferic ritual to carry plutonium into the jet stream and deposit it on the population centers of the US and give you the cancer rates you have today. 911 tests were done in Nevada. |
buzz User ID: 19617032 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1439282 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For once he's doing some good! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26116340 Nukes harms more than humans and should never have been used or invented. If you are pro nukes you are against Earth and all its life. It's either or, nothing in between! Yeah!!! Where's the work ethic!! We can kill millions by hand, these lazy bastards are afraid of work. Pro Earth!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56135256 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65484410 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60499354 ![]() 11/25/2014 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Of course you're not mentioning how Russia has also cut back. Does it really take 31,000 nukes to fuck up the world? Does it really take that many to cripple a country were at war with? 1500 seems reasonable to me, because it could total out Russia, shit, even 300 could. You have to remember, each one is an EMP also. You might not kill everyone with the strikes, but when their grids fail, people will starve, commerce will stop, especially in this modern world. You fail to realize the yield of such weapons. They devastate cities, demoralize troops, shut down grids. They are the worst case scenario weapons. You should watch a movie called "on the beach". I think it might help you understand just how effective they are at wiping out humanity. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65479700 ![]() 11/25/2014 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads. Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500. Quoting: Slack-fisted Doom-browser Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama. He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads. [link to endoftheamericandream.com] [link to prntscr.com] they are not able to start a war with 1000s of nukes, they can start a war with 7 or 4 nukes ! its taking ages to remove all those nukes before they can start a war |