More evidence that the Charlie Hebdo "massacre" was a total hoax

Great find , thanks OP


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
embedded



Best proof it was a false flag!



mods...this deserves a major PIN.

LOL at the molotov cocktail explosion :)

Well done, O/P! You beat me to it. This really is mind-boggling - a bigger scam than Sandy Hook!

Check it out, my fellow GLPers - you won't be disappointed!

I did not see ANY proof of a hoax. Just the usual suspicions, insinuations and arguments one tends to get from people looking for a conspiracy.

Sorry, but the proof is not in this film. Joining together what is merely highly contentious argument and ambiguous evidence at best of a narrative different from the official one does not amount to a substantial piece of proof.

Well, the part about the money was quite enlightening.

When you add in all the other problems with with the OS, the evidence really points to just another staged event that has been foisted upon the world.

Many have picked apart the video the alleged "killing" of the cop, the fact that the "shooter" left his ID in the car, the fact that the alleged "getaway driver" had an aliby that he was in school, that the perps were well-known to the police for years...it goes on and on.

But...you can believe what you want to believe.

Last Edited by Stickywicket on 02/03/2015 05:49 AM

Thanks for the pin, whoever you are!

Mmmm.. Something is up.

circumstantial at best. who gives a fuck about adresses.

reality is much simpler.

What do you do think about the 4 hours of recording of Amedy Coulibaly argumenting with the hostages at hyper cacher. i heard about half an hour.

he was obviously brainwashed. by mason-imams

i cannot help but notice that debunkers focus on what happened at Charlie hebdo.

but completely ignore hyper cacher and the printing shop, the 2 other locations.

did you see Coulibaly being put 2 in the head? right after being hit with shot gun in the ribs? or did you see the cadavers lying on the ground.?

was that staged.?

it easier to say what happened at charlie hebdo was a hoax. because it was not filmed.

i id like to add, personally if i was to die today, i wouldnt give a fuck about identity card.


islamic shill.

lame debunker.

the fact that they were let loose in Paris shows that mason official were implicated, not that it never happened.

stupid distorted logic.

Cant believe people believe this twalap! Seems the jews are behind everything these day, this is nothing but an anti semetic rant!

made me laugh when I saw the zionist deception at the end!!! WHY DO SUCH A SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE CAUSE U SUCH PAIN!! Shame really

For farks sake AGAIN???????

Programmed Sheepel already forgotten and moved on just like the puppeteers programmed em to do so.


WAKE UPPPPPPP

Circumstantial at best.

all debunkers are focusing on Charlie hebdo office.

what about hyper cacher? what about the 4 hours of recording of amhedy Coulibaly?

he listened to mauybe 10 minutes of it.

enough for me, he was hopelessly brainwashed.

are saying that the assault was fake?

did you see Coulibaly get hit in the ribs, thrown in the wall by the impact and then receiving 2 in the head?

was that staged. or the cadaver on the ground.?

staged too?

there is 2 video of the assault, by looking at both you see everything unfolding.

no keep focusing on 2 or 3 years old event.

Molotov cocktail analysis is shitty at best. there is such a thing as explosive Molotov cocktail.

comprised of potassium nitrate, nitric acid and fuel.

autoigniting stuff, nasty.

a propane bomb could have done just that.

or oxy-cutting gaz bomb. too. altough oxy-cutting bomb are powerfull and dangerous. static shock will set them off.

that doesnt convince me at all.

There must be real good info in that link and the video.

Never seen such a hoard of shills in a while.

Wow grumpier. You are jumping the shill train?

HEBs DO it

Must admit, not often do I do that.
This time it seems appropriate.

why dont you read it and then report.

we'll see you like the fact that they made peyot a year ago.

or the fact that it is very hard to confirm their adress.

the fact that they were Under police protection and that info about them was made confidential and probably misleading... not enough, obviously.

i didnt see any relevance to their finances either.

they were in trouble. so what? does that prove that they staged a massacre.

it simply proves they were shuned by a band of hypocrites that are now profiting of the news exposure by bringing them what they needed 2 years ago.

ho and it is possible that they also had "mis"used some of the funds they had 2 years ago from the petrol bomb and they got out of the country for holidays... what ever.

note it was not called a cocktail Molotov.

the fact that it is called a petrol bomb does not implies that it was crude oïl that was used... it implies that petrol byproduct was used and it was explosive in nature. exactly what you see on the pictures. cops dont release specific info on bombing so that the next retards doesnt get info he needs from them.

ether is fucking explosive and it is a petrol by-product.

this is my report.

show me yours dimtard.

Well, let me shill a little. All the "paper" did not ignite, because it was not lying on the ground as can be seen in the video. Ever tried to burn a book? It does not burn very well, cause the sheets stick together and not enough air can get in between. Especially when they are stuck together in a shelf.



The firefighters most likely pulled the books out to extinct any pocket of embers. Thats why all the shit is lying outside, it was not caused by an explosion.

Once again, we as a society need to learn the difference between proof and evidence.

There is definitive evidence that MMR vaccines reduce outbreaks of these diseases. In fact, there is enough evidence to call it proof. There is evidence it is linked to Autism, although it is tacit and likely spurious.

There is evidence the flu vaccine doesn't work! However, there is no definitive proof.

Scientific evidence is evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and in accordance with scientific method. Standards for scientific evidence vary according to the field of inquiry, but the strength of scientific evidence is generally based on the results of statistical analysis and the strength of scientific controls.


Proof is evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.


These are the established definitions for both! What you people are saying is "proof" is often little more than very dubious evidence to support some pretty "out there" ideas and hypothesis.

However, I support your right to try to question because this is how science works! Question everything! However, somethings, like gravity, are just there and you can't just deny them.

mostly possible.

it does look like it went out all at the same time...

if it was a blast, there would be more shredded stuff.

so it was a very lousy cocktail Molotov.

even better.

Hoax my ass!!..this isn't conspiracy this is manipulation

This is pure musslim propaganda!!

You should have asked nicely

i dont do nice

I did not say I found the scenes of the fire after a petrol bomb, whatever hat is, conclusive.
I know big amounts of paper need a lot of time to really get burning.

To me the pictures looked like that, after the fire and the extinguishing with water, the paper was thrown out of the building. That is because is usually restarts if you dont do that. Spread it and use the fire hose again...normal procedure.

Yep. That's exactly how its done.

It doesn't just SEEM that way.

Only because,in the end they got refuge at a Jewish owned newspaper?

That could be a coincidence.

Hardly a base to conclude that the JEWS were behind it.

I found the money trail more interesting.

Thread: CHARLIE HEBDO False Flag Bullshit Artist: Jeannette Bougrab EXPOSED!! (Rothschild)