INMARSAT SATELLITE DATA FOR MH370 SHOWS DATA FOR THREE PLANES UPDATE PAGE 5: EIGHT PLANES IN INMARSAT DATA EIGHT PLANES

[link to www.dca.gov.my]

This is the data released by Malaysia from the data from Inmarsat - so I believe.

Also - I think there is more data - but the data published has been sanitised - I believe this was reported previously in the news - I think Malaysia said because it is an ongoing situation.

I found a little extra info on this site:

[link to github.com (secure)]


But there is still a lot missing:


for example - where are the T Channel acknowledge/ requests for P600-0-36FC?

If this plane flew to Vietnam from KL - then where is the rest of the data?

Why does the cockpit audio tell the pilot to "Cancel SID"? This means - cancel your flight path?

We have been told that MH370 reached IGARI waypoint and was even picked up at BITOD waypoint by Cambodia radar - where is the sat data for that?


Why is it being hidden - and what is the truth of what happened to the passengers and crew?


xx

The idea that MH370 landed somewhere is gaining steam again - according to this article:

[link to www.inquisitr.com]


Please keep this info bumped - for the missing passengers and crew and for the safety of all civilians travelling by air.


xx

All the T-Channel tail numbers log on and log off - request and acknowledge: over the Malaysian mainland - in the Gulf of Thailand - and in the south of Thailand mainland - nowhere else.

Look at the P Channel and T Channel and R Channel data that coincides with the pings at 2.25am from P600-0-36FC on the east coast of Vietnam not far from Hainan - the pings are in Malaysia mainland.

P600-0-36FC was a decoy for something or someone on MH370 to be moved - passengers or cargo.


They said the cargo was mangoes - but the mangoes: 4600kg about cost $51000 - more - to ship - this is hyper-expensive mangoes costing over $11 per kg to move - to China who is the second largest producer of mangoes.

There is no military operation which can be planned in advance such that 239 civilians and crew of a civilian passenger plane must disappear.

We have the right to answers.

If it was dodgy cargo - say so - remove it - don't take the plane and crew and people.


It is time for answers.


xx

Look very closely at this screenshot from the published satellite data:

[link to imgur.com]


we have 3 P channels - 3 planes - pinging at 08.19am - two P-Channels are listed:

P-36FC at -2/49660 - this is belitung Island - the same place airasia PK AXC went down.

then 2 readings at: 252/18040 - this is south Thailand mainland

and

182/23000 - this is the Gulf of Thailand - no P channel - but according to prior data - this could be P10500-0-3859 - we have data for this plane from 11.41pm to 1.07am only - but potentially at least 3 different tail numbers for this plane.

Where is the rest of the data?

Clearly many people know the whereabouts of these planes - why are we not being told?


Why? People are not sacrifices for any sort of covert operations.


xx

Last Edited by redhouserebel on 02/07/2015 09:05 AM

Every plane that flies registers its terminal as a P-Channel - there are 3 listed in the data.

When the plane is in contact with a ground radar station - like air traffic control ATC or in this case - MAS OPS - Malaysia flight operations - then this communication is noted in the data as an R-Channel communication. There are a number of R-Channels listed - but most communications are with MAS OPS in the data.

When a plane is given a tail number for its flight - this registers as a T-Channel - this shows radar controllers at various ATC points - which plane is where.


We have been told that after the final pings at 08.19am - that the plane was "interrogated" and did not respond - but these interrogations were not sent to P600-0-36FC - the plane which pinged at -2/49660 and which determined the search arc; these interrogations were sent to P10500-0-386B - which did not reply - even though it also had pinged elsewhere at 08.19am.


So it was a lie and a falsehood given to create the presumption that MH370 had flown all that time and run out of fuel.


In fact - from the east coast of Vietnam in that time - the plane could just as easily have come back to KL - had some tea and biscuits and still easily made it to the last ping point.

Enough with the lies and the cover-up.

From 2.25am at east of Vietnam to 8.19am at Belitung - you do the maths - the data is all there.


Well - not all of it - but enough to raise some serious questions.


xx

This petition to get all the sat data released

[link to www.change.org (secure)]


It only got signed by 257 people.


Can someone please make another one. And this time we will make sure more people see it and we will all sign it!!!!!!

BUMP for MH370 passengers and crew.

BFO readings = latitude - north and south

BTO = longitude - east and west

Hope i got that right

The higher the BFO the more north - the lower - the more south

the higher the BTO the more east the lower the more west:


For example - when MAS OPS made contact with "MH370" at 2.25am - which they said happened at 2.33am - but reading says 2.25am - they said they were at a bearing 14.5N and 109E - this s east coast of Vietnam on a map

The BFO reading here was 273

this is the highest BFO reading on the data - so this is the furthest north we have data for.


The BTO here was 51700

this is the highest BTO readng we have - it implies this is the greatest distance east the plane went - which plane of the many - we only know it was P600-0-36FC

Compare with KL

BFO - 88-90

somewhere between 88 and 90 I am guessing - there are many BFO readings between midnight and 1am thereabouts and more than 1 plane so hard to pinpoint an exact BFO - but another plane there at the same time will give a reading which can be taken to be exact.

The BTO at KL is between 14800 and 14900


So the altitude north and south distance between these two points is

243-90

and longitude difference is

51700-14900


Don't worry about movement with respect to the satellite or let any one boggle your brain - this was an 8/9 hour period with no great distances travelled.


xx


ps I said the data for P=3859 ended at 1.07am in an above post - it ended at 2.05am - sorry. Always double check everything I say xx


xx

Last Edited by redhouserebel on 02/07/2015 09:06 AM

For truth.


xx

Holy shit.

An OP thread to herself.

To be honest, I can't be arsed reading it all, whats the gist here?

The satellite data for MH370 shows data for pings from at least 3 planes.


xx


That is why no one could analyse it correctly or decide where to look for the plane.


xx

It becomes very apparent what has gone on when you realise this.

The P-Channel numbers show 3 planes in the data as there are 3 different numbers - others may have been deleted but still show pings from T-Channel if they were ever assigned the MH370 tail number.

There is loads of Tchannel tail number swapping going on - and there are 4 T Channel numbers - not sure then if it was MH370 that changed its tail number this many times - or shared the changes with decoys.

xx

Very Interesting

Here is the published data:

[link to www.dca.gov.my]


open it and do control-F - find "P-Channel" keep going through all the finds and make sure to note the P-Channel numbers - they will look like:

IOR-P10500-0-3859

IOR-P10500-0-386B

IOR-P600-0-36FC


Compare the times/ compare the BFO compare the BTO


Then do the same for T-Channel - which is T Channel assignment - notice when T Channel is assigned - it is assigned by an R-Channel - which is groumd control contact - each ground control has a diiferent R-Channel reference - there are 8 but some only appear once.

This one is MAS OPS

IOR-R1200-0-36ED

IOR-R1200-0-36ED


Look at the times - look at 2.25am - shown in this doc as 18.25am UTC - look where the different planes are pinging from - one is in east coast Vietnam - the other two are on Malaysia mainland


Look at where the P-Channels (the planes) are - at 8.19am - shown on the document data at the end - as 00.19am UTC


There is 8 hours difference between Malaysia time and UTC time - so add 8 hours to the data for MYT - Malaysia time.


xx

Here are screenshots: one is data of three planes between 2.03am and 2.28am

this is the data:

[link to i.imgur.com]


This is a plane supposed to be MH370 at 2.28am - ignore the line - that was me just working out the north and south - the red marker is the plane's position:

[link to i.imgur.com]


This is another plane at 2.27am - supposed to be MH370 - it is another plane:

[link to i.imgur.com]


the mark at Vietnam on this one shows a plane at 2.25am - also MH370 - the line just shows where KL is but this P Channel info does not show pings along this line - this plane only pinged at east Vietnam at 2.25am and again at 8.19am at Belitung Island:

[link to i.imgur.com]


The reason for the tail swaps at this time are because Ho Chi Minh contacted KL ATC who contacted MAS OPS who contacted the plane and said it was fine on east coast of Vietnam at 14.5N and 109E - hence the ping - then contact was made again with the plane on or over Malaysia mainland.


This is not an accident. This is not a coincidence.

The real MH370 was diverted inside Malaysia for a reason - and t seems the passengers were planned casualties. It seems that in order to steal what was wanted it was necessary to say the plane had crashed and people had died - hence it was a hijacking of people.

Again - maybe the queries about the cargo were to create the pretence of a reason for the first diversion - unbeknown to all people involved that there was actually a hijacking taking place - or about to take place. This would explain why Malaysia Government came out and publicly said they felt the uS had shot down the plane.

I think another plane whose channel numbers we do not know was dumped in the sea south of Vietnam - but no one believed this was MH370 - so everyone was searching for the real one.

More info on links given to other threads above.


xx

They are using the passenger for their next project like a Nuke false flag or a new Virus

:herewecome:

Some of the maps and info i have given and drawn on the linked threads are incorrect in some ways as i was working through the data step by step.

If it is true that the 49660 last ping ping arc is as we are told - then it must be accepted that this arc has been assumed because the last ping was at (-2, 49660)

the BFO is -2

the BTO is 49660 - final ping arc given or measured or assumed from this.


therefore if take off at KL is (90, 14900) - then KL is on the 14900 ping arc

therefore at 2.25am the ping reading (273, 51700) gives a BTO 51700 - even further from the 49660 final ping arc and even further from KL - luckily - we know the bearing of this reading: it is 14.5N and 109E because MAS OPS checked on the plane at Ho Chi Minh's request and reported this to them at 2.36am - this is recorded info.


We can now say that as the plane - any plane at this time - moves east of KL the BTO number increases.

KL - 14900

49660 ping arc - given on all maps cutting through around Ho Chi Minh and Belitung Island for example


if the number of pings is less than 14900 - we can say a plane is west of KL



---


So now look at the BFO:

at KL it is about 90 - maybe 88 - it depends how the planes take off or fly over - to get an exact spot.

the BFO east of Vietnam is 273 I think - this is a significantly higher number - so a plane going more north to the satellite has a higher BFO


No one can deny this - because they released the ping arc subject to the BTO reading - the fnal ping reading - but look at that ping - it is not simply 49660 - it is MINUS TWO BFO 49660 BTO

So - from KL to 14.5N - east Vietnam is 273-90 - a difference of 183 BFO pings - this is going north and south - latitude i think it is called.



So - from KL to minus 2 - would be 92 BFO pings different

from east Vietnam would be 273 - 275 = - 2 BFO



---


So then find the actual distance latitude - and divide by BFO pings - and you get distance per each ping -



For the BTO readings get the longitude distance of any known points and this gives us satellite ping distance to work out true bearing of plane/s as per the data - which is fact not conspiracy.


The final ping is thus at Belitung Island with 140 metres of where airasia went down - and this was plane P600-0-36FC.

At 8.19 when this ping was received - we can see the other planes were elsewhere: one was in the south of Thailand - and one was in the Gulf of Thailand - if I remember and calculated correctly.

Details on other threads.


xx


If you look at the final ping arc - as has been in all the media etc - a location in the sea just south of vietnam Ho Chi Minh - is also on the arc - but this is not a -2 BFO reading.


xx

Last Edited by redhouserebel on 02/07/2015 09:10 AM

Complete loss/annihilation of commercial airliners with hundredths of people on-board never happen at cruising attitude - yet it happened four times in 2014.

MH370 was/is unprecedented....yet three similar incidents has happened in the wake hereof.

A plane cruises at 30.000+ feet and in an instant it is "taken out". No transponder, no autopilot, no radio communication, no distress calls, no beacon signals, no cell phone communication, no radar signature. A total, complete all-encompassing shut down of everything...

MH370, MH17, AH5017 and QZ8501 where all lost to the world in the blink of an eye, at cruising attitude, well into a problem-less flight, with numerous other aircraft in close vicinity. An "everything-normal" situation turning into complete annihilation within a breath.

In all cases anomalies where abundant and in all cases the number of unanswered questions far outnumber those answered.

OP's data concerning MH370 are correct, and tell a story of something that the global community tries not to discuss......out of fear and a sentiment that we - the people - are too ignorant.

Truth is that no-one really knows what happened in any of these cases, and there is a very high probability that we will see yet an incident within a very narrow timeframe......

The Inmarsat data includes factual scientific evidence making it clear that at least three planes were made identifiable as MH370.

The tail numbers cannot be changed by the pilot - only by ATC - this shows knowledge - this is in the data which shows T Channel assignments.


The cockpit audio - transcribed clearly in articles all over the web and in lots of news media - clearly states to the pilot - seconds before take-off: "Cancel SID" - this means cancel your flight plan - according to the data - another plane flies over at this time and picks up the tail number; on the audio the person speaking now has a different voice.

We have clear and direct evidence of a plane swap - for reasons unknown in fact, but the Inmarsat data is correct - but incomplete - some details are removed - if we see them - we know much more.

xx

To follow

When Challenger exploded, a friend told me that he knew someone who is a 'listener.' His duty was to listen to airwaves. He said another rocket lifted off at the same time as Challenger and believes Challenge was a decoy.

Lets not forget that in this flight, five of the very few westerners/caucasian on board used faked identities and false passports.
Is that normal in Malasia ?

Perma pin this !!

And paste copy the thread to news outlets. Spread the damn word.

Thank you.





Please follow the links and get relevant data - please post up the cockpit audio data links - I have maybe three other threads on this - I know some people got what I was saying - but we need everyone to see. I have hurt my back and doped up on pain killers so struggling now - please add info and links.


I will try to find some too.


xx

Langley league of satanic assholes took it, they 9/11end the passengers and crew.

The passports were reportedly stolen in Thailand. There is a strong connection to Thailand in the satellite data. The media has even reported MH370 being "picked up" as a Thai domestic flight.


A lot of intel is conveyed in the media - so read that as you will.


xx

If the passengers were divided into groups as has been suggested - then the assumption there would that be people receiving the hostages at all destinations would find murder on that scale acceptable - which leads me to wonder if some were officially being covertly sent home - and en route met up with more accidents - as per airasia for example.

The ones sent to India are possible the ones dumped - dead cadavers in Ukraine - it would not surprise me if Modi allowed that as he has a known public history of genocide in Rajahstan before he became PM.


xx

:herewecome:

Some pusses are just too damn big to punish

OP,
Are the steep ascent to high altitude and a possible flight path to Diego Garcia pertinent to this passenger aircraft?

Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 02/07/2015 10:36 AM

OP,
Are there any runways long enough in Malaysia for MH370 to land?... that don't have cell towers to ping the passenger phones? Even traveling over the countryside the plane would be tracked by cell comms.
The immediate Rolls Royce response, to relieve them of engine failure liability, was engines were running for 4 hours after it went missing(or dark!).
RR Engine sat data uploads would continue on a different comm, whereas remote control of the plane would shut down any/other tracking comms.

Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 02/07/2015 10:40 AM