NEW CLIMATE PAPER GIVES GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS ‘ONE HELLUVA BEATING’ | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65830331 New Zealand 03/21/2015 03:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17737818 United States 03/21/2015 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58812623 United States 03/30/2016 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since they can't refute real science, expect the warm mongers to attack the scientists performing actual science. Quoting: Boss Moss [link to www.breitbart.com] A new scientific paper has driven yet another nail into the coffin of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. (H/T Bishop Hill The paper – Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing by Bjorn Stevens of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany, published in the American Meteorological Society journal – finds that the effects of aerosols on climate are much smaller than those in almost all the computer models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Aerosols are the minute particles added to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels (as well as by non-anthropogenic sources, like volcanoes). The reason they are important is that they are so often cited by alarmists to excuse the awkward fact that the world has stubbornly failed to warm at the disastrous rate they predicted it would. Apparently – or so the excuse goes – these aerosols are masking the true extent of runaway climate change by cancelling out the effects of man-made CO2. You are such a blatant liar and stupid son of a batch. Damn, you are dumb! You are so fugging stupid that you do not even have the slightest idea what you are writing about. Different aerosols have different effects on slowing down Global Warming. In the United States and Europe we use fairly clean coal, but that is not the case in China where they use the cheapest grades and the most radioactive polluting coal. In the case of Global dimming, pollution is good, even if it is bad for the lungs and is very cancer causing because of Uranium in the coal. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71526980 Canada 03/30/2016 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |