A Day in the life, by the beatles ... | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68746116 ![]() 03/28/2015 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read the news today .... Quoting: loveexists He blew his mind out in a car .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .... It is painfully obvious that this song is about Paul McCartney and the "Guinness heir" was a cover story put forth ... The last example is referring to fake paul, the replacement who stole his name after his assassination .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .. ie, they recognized him intuitively as a member of the famous "elite", a scion of the Campbell dynasty and likely government agent, ie "member" of the house of lords ... Thanks, OP. I agree for whatever reason there were multiples. But I don't believe anyone was assasinated or died. That part is a cover. Part of the psyop. It's obvious that the Paul we see today is not the same person or persons seen in certain photographs and videos. |
Doc Savage![]() Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 50442236 ![]() 03/28/2015 05:35 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I USED to think the "Paul Is Dead" story was sheer craziness. That ended when I saw an article in the Italian edition of Wired magazine. Two forensic experts set out to debunk the whole PID "hoax" and then were amazed to be convinced that is was true. They made close and detailed comparisons of many pre-1966 and post-1966 photos of McCartney and determined that the guy who's apparently been impersonating McCartney for nearly 50 years is not The Real Deal. |
loveexists (OP) User ID: 66790266 ![]() 03/28/2015 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read the news today .... Quoting: loveexists He blew his mind out in a car .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .... It is painfully obvious that this song is about Paul McCartney and the "Guinness heir" was a cover story put forth ... The last example is referring to fake paul, the replacement who stole his name after his assassination .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .. ie, they recognized him intuitively as a member of the famous "elite", a scion of the Campbell dynasty and likely government agent, ie "member" of the house of lords ... Thanks, OP. I agree for whatever reason there were multiples. But I don't believe anyone was assasinated or died. That part is a cover. Part of the psyop. It's obvious that the Paul we see today is not the same person or persons seen in certain photographs and videos. Interesting. Do you think he was a threat to them and was replaced but not killed, or do you think the "original paul" was in on the plan from the beginning ? Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence |
loveexists (OP) User ID: 66790266 ![]() 03/28/2015 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I USED to think the "Paul Is Dead" story was sheer craziness. That ended when I saw an article in the Italian edition of Wired magazine. Two forensic experts set out to debunk the whole PID "hoax" and then were amazed to be convinced that is was true. They made close and detailed comparisons of many pre-1966 and post-1966 photos of McCartney and determined that the guy who's apparently been impersonating McCartney for nearly 50 years is not The Real Deal. Quoting: Doc Savage Exactly. Different parting of the hair, different facial structure, even slightly different height, extremely different attitude, rude and egotistical whereas the original paul was much more warm and open, etc. He also showed virtually no emotional distress when informed of the death of John Lennon. And though its passed off as a reference to being "dead inside", John did after all sing " those freaks was right when they said you were dead " ... in How do you sleep? to "McCartney" .. of course he upheld the paradigm that the current paul was the original paul at first, however .... but as he broke free from "McCartney" he became less and less interested in upholding such an obviously deceptive paradigm ... Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62464084 ![]() 03/28/2015 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I USED to think the "Paul Is Dead" story was sheer craziness. That ended when I saw an article in the Italian edition of Wired magazine. Two forensic experts set out to debunk the whole PID "hoax" and then were amazed to be convinced that is was true. They made close and detailed comparisons of many pre-1966 and post-1966 photos of McCartney and determined that the guy who's apparently been impersonating McCartney for nearly 50 years is not The Real Deal. Quoting: Doc Savage |
Doc Savage![]() Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 50442236 ![]() 03/28/2015 06:18 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I USED to think the "Paul Is Dead" story was sheer craziness. That ended when I saw an article in the Italian edition of Wired magazine. Two forensic experts set out to debunk the whole PID "hoax" and then were amazed to be convinced that is was true. They made close and detailed comparisons of many pre-1966 and post-1966 photos of McCartney and determined that the guy who's apparently been impersonating McCartney for nearly 50 years is not The Real Deal. Quoting: Doc Savage Here you go: [link to hugequestions.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68747465 ![]() 03/28/2015 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read the news today .... Quoting: loveexists He blew his mind out in a car .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .... It is painfully obvious that this song is about Paul McCartney and the "Guinness heir" was a cover story put forth ... The last example is referring to fake paul, the replacement who stole his name after his assassination .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .. ie, they recognized him intuitively as a member of the famous "elite", a scion of the Campbell dynasty and likely government agent, ie "member" of the house of lords ... Thanks, OP. I agree for whatever reason there were multiples. But I don't believe anyone was assasinated or died. That part is a cover. Part of the psyop. It's obvious that the Paul we see today is not the same person or persons seen in certain photographs and videos. Interesting. Do you think he was a threat to them and was replaced but not killed, or do you think the "original paul" was in on the plan from the beginning ? In on the plan. |
loveexists (OP) User ID: 66790266 ![]() 03/28/2015 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read the news today .... Quoting: loveexists He blew his mind out in a car .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .... It is painfully obvious that this song is about Paul McCartney and the "Guinness heir" was a cover story put forth ... The last example is referring to fake paul, the replacement who stole his name after his assassination .... They'd seen his face before, wasn't really sure if he was from the house of lords .. ie, they recognized him intuitively as a member of the famous "elite", a scion of the Campbell dynasty and likely government agent, ie "member" of the house of lords ... Thanks, OP. I agree for whatever reason there were multiples. But I don't believe anyone was assasinated or died. That part is a cover. Part of the psyop. It's obvious that the Paul we see today is not the same person or persons seen in certain photographs and videos. Interesting. Do you think he was a threat to them and was replaced but not killed, or do you think the "original paul" was in on the plan from the beginning ? In on the plan. What do you think the purpose was? A psyop to see whether the public would recognize it was a different person or not, to test the level of their unquestioning faith in the official narrative? Ie, to get them to think in terms of "up is down, black is white, freedom is slavery", etc ? Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68747887 ![]() 03/28/2015 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68746116 Thanks, OP. I agree for whatever reason there were multiples. But I don't believe anyone was assasinated or died. That part is a cover. Part of the psyop. It's obvious that the Paul we see today is not the same person or persons seen in certain photographs and videos. Interesting. Do you think he was a threat to them and was replaced but not killed, or do you think the "original paul" was in on the plan from the beginning ? In on the plan. What do you think the purpose was? A psyop to see whether the public would recognize it was a different person or not, to test the level of their unquestioning faith in the official narrative? Ie, to get them to think in terms of "up is down, black is white, freedom is slavery", etc ? Not sure about all that but I imagine The Beatles to be a real life musical and the whole world is the stage. |