Moon Landing hoax? Debunking the Debunkers?

#7 reminded me of when the Astroz were asked to place their hand on the Bible and swear they went to the moon... their reaction to that was pretty interesting. It was wild how each avoided that request like the plaque...even running away at times.

I mean if I went , I would have no reason to act weird about it, or hesitate for one second to place my hand on the bible and proclaim it happily and with confidence... those reactions are priceless.

The fact that NASA had a full set of simulation equipment (including a large-scale model of the Moon with a camera mounted on tracks so that it could "fly" over the Moonscape), and that the technicians at Mission Control were only looking at lights, gauges, etc, on their control panels, is to me "reasonable doubt" as to whether the event actually happened as presented to the public on TV.

Neil Armstrong's closing quote in his definitive biography was:

[link to books.google.com (secure)]
---
As for walking on the moon, sometimes I wonder if that really happened.
---

The alleged last man to walk on the Moon, Eugene Cernan, told a group of Catholic men at a religious retreat, without being asked:
---
If it was a simulation it was good enough to fool me.
---

Hardly a steadfast assertion, leaving plenty of room for hypnosis and mind-altering drugs--especially given that his superiors could have had, by then, plenty of experience in fooling not only the public but even gullible astronauts.

Last Edited by BeSkeptical on 11/29/2019 04:44 PM

Further, look into the writings of Jack Parson's diaries.

Dude was an absolute madman.

Some DID swear on the Bible but Sibrel doesn't like to show you those.

As for those that didn't, some refused based on religious reasons. Others knew that Sibrel was NOT a journalist but instead a convicted stalker that admitted in court he was going to call them a liar either way. Why even bother trying to work with someone like that?

Yeah...might wanna check which Bible. Was it the their gods Bible?

No one's been to the moon and no one will ever go to the moon. It isn't something you could land on.

Same with Mars. Stars and "planets" are lights set in the firmament dome.

Earth is a flat, stationary, enclosed realm -- not a sphere!

Kill a thread with facts?

If you can't be bothered to find information you think is relevant why should anybody else care?

Anybody, ANYBODY, with an actual interest in Apollo knows where to find it.
You have just demonstrated the one true thing about hoaxies, they don't have clue about what they are talking about.




Hoaxies being ignorant about science and technology is of course a given.
Even low-tech forum software is to complicated fo them.




For some even the English language is to confusing.


*sigh*
We used to have much higher quality hoaxies here.
Guess they all moved to greener pastures.

Look at this. We get some solid information in here, and what immediately happens?

Some guy saying 'hoaxies are dumb' and some flat earth operatives.

Looks like the playbook has not been updated in a decade.

Fact. NASA has not been back for 47+ years and counting.

Fact. No other space agency has ever landed, or claimed to, a man on the Moon.

Fact. There is no manned Moon mission scheduled for the next 5 years.

Now someone will tell me "yeah, it was mankind's greatest EVER accomplishment, but its just too expensive!"

Do they realize that it is the rocket that goes up in space, and all the money spent actually stays on Earth?

I wouldn't imagine an atheist would care one way or the other, but a believer I can see not wanting to do so... and I was speaking of the ones who would not and could be seen visibly shaking and running away.. No matter how you spin it, it doesnt look good... as did it not look good when the one he showed the section of Earth through the window , kicked him literally out of the house and then his son threatening to have him dealt with by the CIA or the like... Its been some years since I saw it but those reactions were golden

Again we look at the filmed material.. it makes little difference if you Ad hominem the messenger... that can never diminish what was filmed or explain away the human behavior of the astroz...

*Buzzzz*

Lame attempt at Shill Gambit.
Don't be a loser and just present evidence for your claim.


And none of that has any bearing on the historical question.
It's just FUD.

Don't be a loser and just present evidence for your claim.
You not understanding that the Space Race is over is not evidence, it is just more ignorance.
And in grown-up land arguments from ignorance carry no weight.

Did you miss the part about Sibrel being convicted for trespassing on Armstrong's property.
And got fired as a result.

People usually do not want to interact with stalkers, they can be dangerous and are always unsavoury.

You really need to learn to vet your sources.
This one isn't just an intellectual fraud but has an actual wrap sheet.

The hoaxies claim that the Apollo record was faked.
This is not just a claim, this is a criminal accusation.
In many jurisdictions it would be considered felonious if anyone took it serious.


That's not actually true.
All claims require sufficient evidence.


Hardly.
It's not even a scientific claim.

It is a HISTORICAL claim.


Only madman and skepbots demand such a thing.
Normal folks are satisfied with proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Of course, nobody expects conspirasheep to be reasonable.


Since is Men On The Moon is a historical claim, not a scientific claim, that is irrelevant.


Nope, that's not how the Historical Method works.
You do not have to shoot a president in Dealey Plaza to prove that JFK was murdered.


And they did.
Why are you confused/


And now we are suddenly in a court of law?
Over a historical question?


And this is sheer unadulterated denialism.
You either have a cognitive disorder or you are straight-faced lying.


Why?
You have no standing.
You have no probable cause.
You have no case.

And who is going to pay for that?
Comedy Central?


It is not to late.
But the likes of you always run away when given such an opportunity.

Calling people criminals to their face takes more guts than most you can muster.

Did you miss the part about Sibrel being convicted for trespassing on Armstrong's property.
And got fired as a result.

People usually do not want to interact with stalkers, they can be dangerous and are always unsavoury.

You really need to learn to vet your sources.
This one isn't just an intellectual fraud but has an actual wrap sheet.

[/quote

Investigative journalists get in these kinds of scenarios all the time...

Anyone who would challenge this juggernaut to such a degree I would not expect any less...I know as much about him personally as I do about Neil and the rest...I know what was captured on film.

If he tossed kittens into wood chippers it wouldn't change the captured interactions he had with the astroz and their behavior on camera for public consumption as a result...

Nasa claims we don't have the technology anymore!


EXPLAIN how that makes an REAL sense?

I would love to have seen a forward facing camera (in time lapse) from Earth to the Moon. In fact Id love to see any forward facing long span footage...

Evidence? I did. I said NASA hasn't replicated the feat for 47+ years, and no other space agency has managed the feat. Including the Russians, the Soviets before them, India, China, Japan, the European Space Agency, all these space agencies splitting the cost and working together...

I am not making a claim, except that NASA's claim is NOT credible, especially in hindsight. They asked two of the foremost experts, sci-fi writers, Robert Heinlein and Arthur C Clarke, what would come next, after the Apollo 11 landing.

They said it would be WORLD PEACE and then... A space elevator! I shit you not. This was in July, 1969, on CBS I believe.

Instead of a space elevator, we can't even do what we did 'easily' 6 times, 50 years ago! And I am supposed to PROVE that NASA made outlandish claims?

Ultimately, the only thing that can prove there were men on the Moon is the footage. And the footage never gets referenced, people always want to talk about 'scientific evidence' and Moon rocks and '3rd party verification', but never the footage!

The actual footage of astronauts on the Moon! Why not?

I will ask a question here. Was it possible to film a fake manned Moon landing, in 1969? Yes or no? Who could have filmed, directed, and produced such an effort, if so?

Best bet is probably some of the Ranger or Surveyor footage.

Of course those don't prove that a MAN landed on the Moon...

Your words mean nothing in light of the time and information preset!

Good day sir!

Sibrel is not an investigative journalist.
That would require actual investigations, NOT fabricating evidence.
Sibrel is a fraud.

Also, investigative journalists get arrested for criminal tresspass all time?
Investigative journalists get arrested for malicious vandalism all time?
Investigative journalists barely stay out of prison for poking an old guy with a book all time?


Maybe you should fix that lacuna so you get some perspective.


So you failed to notice that Sibrel went out of his way to set up these antagonistic encounters to get the footage he wanted, and will never show you anything else?

What a good wittle gullible conspirasheep you are.

This is all psychobabble anyway.

How do you intend to deal with mountains of hard physical evidence that proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Men landed on the Moon?
For some reason hoaxies keep avoiding that.


Write a proposal.
Send money.

There are quite a lot of photographs though.




Technology as in hardware.
Nobody makes Saturn Vs anymore.
Heck, nobody makes Space Shuttles anymore.


If you don't use it you lose it.

Anyone who wishes to discuss the history of astronautics should also study the political context.
It makes little sense without it.

Are you daft? Nothing prevents us from going into space except the death part.

A in, NOBODY can yet survive deep space RADIATION!

As in, no space flight IN YOUR LIFETIME! We need non metallic shielding.

So no! No space flights for the war monkeys!

Are you daft? Nothing prevents us from going into space except the death part.

A in, NOBODY can yet survive deep space RADIATION!

As in, no space flight IN YOUR LIFETIME! We need non metallic shielding.

So no! No space flights for the war monkeys!

The halcyon has been discredited so often he can’t be a human.

No one who really looks into it still believes the lie.


No one without a paycheck to lose!

LOL

And another loser to retarded to understand that the Shill Gambit is a dead give away that YOU KNOW can't prove anything.

Why are you such a loser, loser?
Why can't you prove anything, loser?
Why hasn't any of you losers proven anything in half a century?

You really think you're making an impression on the peanut gallery with your though talk?
Do you really think they didn't notice that you are an idiot?

Go fool the other one, loser.

Oh. Hoaxie "evidence."


So?

This implies that you believe that every space agency has a desperate overwhelming need to send humans to the Moon.
Why the hell would you think that?
Apollo wasn't even really about sending humans to the Moon, it was about defeating the Soviets at their own game.

The Cold War is over, the circumstances that conspired to make Apollo a national emergency programme will never repeat.


Suuuure...



According to some snot-nosed ignoramus-on-the-internet?
Why should we care?



SF writers are not experts on space politics.
They also tend to be overly optimistic.

In case you haven't notices we are not living inside a 1950s SF novel.
Real world constrains made that impossible.


Nobody who actually knows what NASA's claims are, and is intellectually equipped to asses them seems to think so.
It is just you, and those other snot-noses, and you do have to make a case.

"I don't understand something" is just an admission of ignorance.
It can't prove anything.


What's this obsession kOOks have with pictures?
MTV generation?
Is it because the pictures is the only thing you actually know about?
Is it because you want to ignore all the physical evidence you can't deal with?
Is it because you've psyched yourself into believing that forensic analysis of images does not require professional expertise?

Throw out the complete audiovisual record due to mishap and the historicity of Apollo would still be proven beyond any reasonable doubt anyway.
As befitting a hoaxie you are simple unaware of just how much evidence there is.


What are you even talking about?
We've discussed it hundreds of times.

Are you new to this?


The question should of course be: could the audiovisual record AS IT EXISTS be faked?
Experts say no.

Also, could is not evidence of is.
I could be the Boston Strangler.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 11/29/2019 07:55 PM

Shut it dumbass that’s your crazy shit there.

Luis.com

Put an a in front!


All the proof you need!

Shit bad link.

A u l i s. Com


Fixed