Moon Landing hoax? Debunking the Debunkers?

USSA sent men to the moon.

America would have to completely collapse before the Ruling Elite will admit to the Moon Hoax. Indeed, the Ruling Elite will be certain to collapse the country rather than admit to the Moon Hoax.

Once one has seen through the Moon Hoax, all the other hoaxes become transparent.

GHW Bush: We will go 'back' to the Moon.
Clinton: No we won't
Dubya: We will go 'back' to the Moon! By 2020!
Obama: Err...
Trump: We will go 'back' to the Moon...

This guy, Nixon, closes the Gold window! The convertibility of USD to gold (at a fixed rate). He helps make China into the monster it is today. He gets impeached and resigns. Unprecedented.

And yet, all manned Moon landings happen during his Presidency, and we are supposed to buy it.

LMBO!!!

Dude, you try waaay too hard!!! I’m sensing a Rain Man vib from you only not nearly as smart.

More like the dumb assed version of Rain Man.

We ALL know you’re a shill fighting a very losing battle and you only show up when the search term “ Moon Hoax” comes up. I feel bad that you got assigned to such a losers cause but I guess if the shoe fits, you put that fucker on!!

He may not be a shill, but a true believer, a NASA fanatic.

Could be but he had all the tell tale signs of a full on shill.

Either way, he knows shit about shit.

worker bee

the hive mentality

They light up like big red lanterns

That is one the most amazing elements of the hoax:

The entire "Moon landing" narrative is based entirely on a single quasi-military organization sworn to obey Commander-in-Chief Richard Nixon, whose fraud was so egregious and so obvious as to force his resignation immediately prior to a certain impeachment and removal.

Why would anyone believe Nixon's lies?

Last Edited by BeSkeptical on 11/30/2019 11:13 PM

The moon landing was a hoax. People are so dumb to see all the signs showing this. There are SO MANY signs showing it to be a hoax that it takes a total degenerate at this point to not see it.

ftfy

I always say, you know, there are six missions (Apollo 13 obviously didn't land on the Moon, nor was it ever claimed that it did). It should be easy to show in all that footage EVIDENCE of 1/6th lunar gravity.

And I don't mean some hammer and feather 'experiment' (which you could probably do on Earth simply by wetting or weighing the feather).

I mean vertical leap. I mean feats of strength.

I would be SO tempted to do a backflip on the Moon. And obviously have my partner spot me, so I don't land on my head or backpack.

But it should be easy. Plus, you, the astronaut and your suit would only weigh the equivalent of what, 60 pounds up there? What do you guys do with your young nieces and nephews? Struggle to catch them or hold them up? Of course not.

Nope nobody has been past low earth orbit!

a u l I s.c o m

Your welcome!

30% and counting know the truth.


Fuck nasa!

Doing stunts like that would suggest the whole thing was fake.

There was a post here on GLP a few years ago from a deep-sea diver (or similar job) who said that the horseplay proved it was fake. He said that while working under the sea, every move was carefully planned, due to the potential danger.

No responsible military test pilot is going to do anything to endanger himself or the mission when he is 1/4 million miles from help.

Your the loser, and a bitter one the type that never had friends ,didnt get dates with girls, sucked at anything in athletics, never fit in anywhere, a mommas boy and this here folks is his only social interaction and I guarantee this bitch would dare talk to a MAN face to face in the way it does others on here you sorry ass pu22y boot licker shut your sorry bitch ass up and accept you are worthless and your future is - boring and lonely and pointless -

poor ole halcyon, nobody except perhaps C.K.P is more dedicated.

If GLP had a "Shill of the Year" award poll, I would probably vote for him. He deserves some recognition to his hard hours.

LOL.
Desperate to avoid the physical evidence, aren't we?


Look all you want.
But don't delude yourself into believing you are remotely QUALIFIED to perform such an analysis.


Why are you disinformed?


So were the Boeing 747, the Harrier, and the Oxcart.
Golden Age of aerospace.


Why the FUCK do you even need to ask?

Like all hoaxies you are ignorant off 98.3% of the evidence.
How can you claim that something YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW EXISTS was faked?


As I said hoaxies are ignorant off 98.3% of the evidence.

The Soviet Landers collected a few scoops of regolith and a tiny core sample.
Show me a robot IN EXISTENCE TODAY that could have collected large rocks and metres long core samples.
And than show me the evidence for the hundred or so covert space flights that would have been required to collect the AMOUNT of Apollo samples.

Magical robots and invisible spacecraft is basically an appeal to actual magic to handwave away evidence.


Unlike you astronauts aren't suicidal. Or stupid.

Since you say you couldn't find evidence of low gravity we must conclude that you couldn't even be bothered to go look for it.
(The Apollo 14 SEQ Bay Pendulum is a classic.)




Calling proven bunk bunk is position signalling now?
Rather than just, you know, a proven fact?
What's wrong with you?

You should give evidence-based reasoning a try one of these days.
You'll end up less confuddled and looking less like a trol.




*yawn*

How stupid does one have to be to believe that content-free post like that, which some added paranoia and ad homming, do not make you look like a raving lunatic bereft of all facts and reason.
The peanut gallery isn't half as dumb as you take them for.
They know what you are.

Again, the only thing hoaxies need to do is provide evidence that proves their accusations.
They've failed to do so for half a century.
Not our fault that they are wrong and/or incompetent.

So stop whining like a little bitch and PROVE THAT YOU ARE RIGHT!




Or maybe just a person who comprehensibly examined the evidence.
Including the evidence the HBs refuse to even acknowledge.
(Mostly because they aren't even aware of its existence.)




Aaaand another empty post by an empty-headed idiot.

If the ONLY THING you can think off is an ad hom attack we know that is because it is the ONLY THING you can think off.
Its only result is that once again the hoaxies demonstrate to the peanut gallery that do not have any factual evidence or reasoned arguments in support of their accusations.

'Cause if they had any they'd just use them.
Looooooser...

I think it's funny that people keep quoting my ginormous omnibus-posts in toto just to respond to a single thing.
Guess the forum software must be to complicated.


Getting a lot of free inches out of it, though.

Haha.. more with the everyone is just stupid routine...

I enjoy your posts actually

:50-:53


Stagehand reflected in the visor.

Perhaps you could post a screenshot of this supposed stagehand. all I see at that point is a reflection of the rover and the sun.

I would say that for the JFK assassination.

But your point is valid.

Says the shillmeister who can’t provide a drop of evidence to prove the moon fakery.

It does seem that being a shut in has provided you the time to be a posting tard expert = Rain Man ftl.

Sure, no prob.

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

And I would say the prime mover is the Faul insertion, but yeah.

So stagehands look like smudges now. Cool. And they somehow don't move on the helmet as the helmet moves as a reflection should but stay in the same place. Neat.

Last Edited by LHP598 on 12/01/2019 12:11 PM

Dance monkey dance!!!!!!!!!!!

Your blindness is not a compelling argument.

Smudge eh?

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

Paul McCartney’s “early death” & replacement?

Yes, and it still doesn't move as the helmet moves but stays in the same place on the visor.