Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,021 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,571,016
Pageviews Today: 2,286,450Threads Today: 617Posts Today: 12,758
06:35 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Moon Landing hoax? Debunking the Debunkers?
Poster Handle Neil WeakLegs
Post Content
Who Controls the Moon Controls the Earth (1958)
[link to www.wired.com (secure)]

Total bs that nasa thinks there is no reason for anyone to go back to the moon.

If any country could they would Not only for military strategic reasons, but for mining, scientific etc..

The fact that only Apollo ever took people out of earth orbit and that was 50 years ago alone proves it was a hoax. Every other achievement (crossing the atlantic, climbing everest, low earth orbit, satellites etc has been repeated. All of the major magazines, papers and journals during this time were predicting Lunar holidays and moon bases by the end of the century. What happened? Are you really trying to say that we just can't replicate that darn 1960's technology?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77734519


Maybe certain factions of the Military Industrial Complex have been to the Moon many times, but they just don't bother to inform the taxpayers, and continue to sell outdated jet and rocket technology to keep the money pouring in?
 Quoting: Neil WeakLegs 77348413


yeah I don't buy into that secret space program stuff, no evidence, and besides that, it has been mil strategy for thousands of years to convince your enemies that you have more crazy magic spectacular weapons etc, it scares your enemy.

Usually the simplest explanation is the right one.
And in this case, that wasn't jumping from failed rocket launches and lemons to a half million mile, slingshotting , flawless cowboy moon romp
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77734519



I think that a good case for some kind of secret space program can be made, but not the Corey Goode fantasies.

Apollo, with its rocket technology, is dubious, but that does not mean that there is not a different type of more reliable technology available to the MIC.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP