| Users Online Now: 2,094 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,540,685 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,559,374 | Threads Today: 1,025 | Posts Today: 18,167 |
| 11:48 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,094 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,540,685 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,559,374 | Threads Today: 1,025 | Posts Today: 18,167 |
| 11:48 PM | ||
Planet Nibiru Confirmed Through Google Sky. | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator  User ID: 38777359  United States06/25/2015 12:13 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For review: Quoting: Dr. Astro No, that is not what was in the missing region of Google Sky. Quoting: Dr. Astro ... Quoting: Dr. Astro No, it's not. They're two completely different things. My video shows what was ACTUALLY missing from google sky. Your video shows a completely different thing in a completely different region of the sky. Here it is from a picture from 1951: [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] Here it is from a picture taken by the same telescope in the 1990s: [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] Same surrounding stars, it hasn't moved in all that time. My alma mater has the 1951 picture at their observatory so I can personally verify that shit and take a new picture of the same nebula and star if you want. It's just a reflection nebula around a t tauri star, a young pre-main sequence star surrounded by the remnants of the cloud it was birthed from. [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] ... Apparently not. Apparently I know more about the sky than you do. I've known about this nebula for years. ... Quoting: Dr. Astro The video is hilariously wrong. Look at the coordinates; 5h 53m 27s, -6d 10' 56" for the "missing section" and the fake "hercolubus image" (see my video for what is really at those coordinates in the missing image) and then 5h 42m 21s, +22d 36' 34.5" for the image of the T Tauri star and nebula. That's over 28 degrees different in declination and nearly 3 degrees different in right ascension. It's not in the "missing region" at all. Here's my telescope's image of the missing region, it's less than a degree in length in declination: [link to nova.astrometry.net] ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Sure! Absolutely, it's right in the URL I gave you for them. [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] 5 42 21.235, +22 36 47.07 Note, of course, that in his video he doesn't have the star+nebula perfectly centered, so his coordinates won't be a perfect match, but the important thing is that it hasn't moved between those images decades apart. Here is astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 90's image. [link to nova.astrometry.net] And here is the astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 1951 image: [link to nova.astrometry.net] :hryk01: It's making the rounds again thanks to BP and Begley, guess I'm going to have to make a video about it... again.  |
| 74444 User ID: 74444 United States06/25/2015 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3795766 United States06/25/2015 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States06/25/2015 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The image had a big blacked out section for the longest time and has now been removed. Quoting: Hamburger Meatballs 26137466 No it has not. You are a liar. All stars have wings on them; just ask Dr. Astro! lol Not all, but some T Tauri stars do. [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69578415 United States06/25/2015 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69603409 United States06/25/2015 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Agoraphobe User ID: 19170904  Canada06/25/2015 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States06/25/2015 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's making the rounds again thanks to BP and Begley, guess I'm going to have to make a video about it... again. good we know you're a smart guy but im sure you will tell us how smart you are like you always do. smh Wow, awfully insecure aren't we? It's not about me, or how smart I am, it's about the truth. The truth is that this isn't in our solar system at all, it isn't in the missing region at all, it was never in the missing region, and has nothing to do with it. The original video was a lie. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20925321 United States06/25/2015 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Take a look at this video. Quoting: Hamburger Meatballs 26137466 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] In it you will see that on the Google Sky website the infamous Planet X, also know as Nibiru is right there in plain site. The image had a big blacked out section for the longest time and has now been removed. Is this definitive proof that the fabled planet does in fact exist? You decide. - - - - - University of YouTube video strikes again! "youtube experts say" |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 58269044 United States06/25/2015 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44834193  Netherlands06/25/2015 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Take a look at this video. Quoting: Hamburger Meatballs 26137466 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] In it you will see that on the Google Sky website the infamous Planet X, also know as Nibiru is right there in plain site. The image had a big blacked out section for the longest time and has now been removed. Is this definitive proof that the fabled planet does in fact exist? You decide. - - - - - No it's not proof. This about the 15th thread that has linked to the same information you have presented. Dr Astro has proved it's bullshit. Nibiru/Planet x does not exist. The first time is was claimed Nibiru would arrive in a few months was in 1993. If Nibiru exists (it doesn't) it is 22 years late. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69127335 United States06/25/2015 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69601268 United States06/25/2015 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For review: Quoting: Dr. Astro No, that is not what was in the missing region of Google Sky. Quoting: Dr. Astro ... Quoting: Dr. Astro No, it's not. They're two completely different things. My video shows what was ACTUALLY missing from google sky. Your video shows a completely different thing in a completely different region of the sky. Here it is from a picture from 1951: [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] Here it is from a picture taken by the same telescope in the 1990s: [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] Same surrounding stars, it hasn't moved in all that time. My alma mater has the 1951 picture at their observatory so I can personally verify that shit and take a new picture of the same nebula and star if you want. It's just a reflection nebula around a t tauri star, a young pre-main sequence star surrounded by the remnants of the cloud it was birthed from. [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] [link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr] ... Apparently not. Apparently I know more about the sky than you do. I've known about this nebula for years. ... Quoting: Dr. Astro The video is hilariously wrong. Look at the coordinates; 5h 53m 27s, -6d 10' 56" for the "missing section" and the fake "hercolubus image" (see my video for what is really at those coordinates in the missing image) and then 5h 42m 21s, +22d 36' 34.5" for the image of the T Tauri star and nebula. That's over 28 degrees different in declination and nearly 3 degrees different in right ascension. It's not in the "missing region" at all. Here's my telescope's image of the missing region, it's less than a degree in length in declination: [link to nova.astrometry.net] ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Sure! Absolutely, it's right in the URL I gave you for them. [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] [link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)] 5 42 21.235, +22 36 47.07 Note, of course, that in his video he doesn't have the star+nebula perfectly centered, so his coordinates won't be a perfect match, but the important thing is that it hasn't moved between those images decades apart. Here is astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 90's image. [link to nova.astrometry.net] And here is the astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 1951 image: [link to nova.astrometry.net] :hryk01: His youtube flim is 6 minutes long, plus the time factored into reading, clicking links, comprending, comparing, and making a conclusion adds about 20 minutes. But you respond in 5 minutes, calling him right in the form of a meme?  |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States06/25/2015 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | His youtube flim is 6 minutes long, plus the time factored into reading, clicking links, comprending, comparing, and making a conclusion adds about 20 minutes. But you respond in 5 minutes, calling him right in the form of a meme? I'm sure he's seen it before, it's not the first time I've posted that video, it's not even the first time I've posted it in response to one of these threads! This isn't the first thread on this subject, it's not the second, it's not even the third! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69602707 United States06/25/2015 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Superheavyweight User ID: 69608964  United Kingdom06/25/2015 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It would be interesting to know if the winged object had a block in the past. Google Sky isn't real time so the photos could have come from anything from 1950+ to 2000+.. I think someone said it came from 2007. We're dealing with 2 different coordinates in the video. Both in or near Orion.. I think the winged object is in between Orion and Taurus.. It's 2 different coordinates in the video. |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States06/25/2015 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But those are 2 different coordinates in the video.. Quoting: Superheavyweight 69608964 It would be interesting to know if the winged object had a block in the past. Google Sky isn't real time so the photos could have come from anything from 1950+ to 2000+.. I think someone said it came from 2007. No, they didn't do their homework, they only went by the copyright date on google's mosaic from 2007. The photo was taken back in the 90's. It's always been there, and google sky never blocked it. Here's a youtube video from someone else who noticed it on google sky 3 years ago. No block. |
| Superheavyweight User ID: 2945549 United States06/25/2015 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But one mystery has nothing to do with the other winged object.. Link 1: [link to www.google.com] Link 2: [link to www.google.com] The video is about the winged object. |
| Birkeland User ID: 69603024 United States06/25/2015 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maybe they're pissed and they're flying a 13 star flag and they're drinking 'shine... :brown daarf:    |
| OCD Chaos Theorist User ID: 62063713 United States06/25/2015 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69608907 United States06/25/2015 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Superheavyweight User ID: 2945549 United States06/25/2015 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ChristianLight User ID: 69428509 United States06/25/2015 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How many years of Nibiru being discredit, and never coming to fruition do we have to hear? It's always the same story, It's never been mapped out. Shills posted the videos to discredit it, etc etc. I am willing to bet you, that When ever this thing is suppose to destroy earth this time around and when it doesn't in a few more years people will look back at 2015 and say "OH NO THEY HAD THE INFO WRONG IT WAS JUST A BUNCH OF SHILLS TRYING TO DISCREDIT IT" Oh brother give me a break already. You know it would be one thing if it was actually real, and would effect any of our lives, but it's not real. ChristianLight |
| The Uncle User ID: 69556444 United States06/25/2015 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The winged object is my Nikes going up your ass to kick you out of GLP. I wish AC's like you would sign up for an account and watch how fast your red karma bar grows... and grows... and grows... with your Nibiru bullshit. Now someone quote me with a "He's right you know". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 52659892 United States06/25/2015 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States06/25/2015 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The winged object is my Nikes going up your ass to kick you out of GLP. I wish AC's like you would sign up for an account and watch how fast your red karma bar grows... and grows... and grows... with your Nibiru bullshit. Now someone quote me with a "He's right you know". Superheavyweight is an idiot spammer who spams threads with his bullshit nibiru videos, the same videos over and over, and when he gets bored of that he starts spamming with random music videos to bog down the thread and make it difficult for anyone to load. Report him when you see him spamming videos. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69461627 United States06/25/2015 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33435073 United States06/25/2015 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 52659892 United States06/25/2015 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 67058418 United States06/25/2015 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
