...


Watch:

...

No, it's not. They're two completely different things. My video shows what was ACTUALLY missing from google sky. Your video shows a completely different thing in a completely different region of the sky. Here it is from a picture from 1951:
[link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)]
Here it is from a picture taken by the same telescope in the 1990s:
[link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)]
Same surrounding stars, it hasn't moved in all that time. My alma mater has the 1951 picture at their observatory so I can personally verify that shit and take a new picture of the same nebula and star if you want. It's just a reflection nebula around a t tauri star, a young pre-main sequence star surrounded by the remnants of the cloud it was birthed from.
[link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr]
[link to simbad.u-strasbg.fr]
...

Apparently not. Apparently I know more about the sky than you do. I've known about this nebula for years.

...

The video is hilariously wrong. Look at the coordinates; 5h 53m 27s, -6d 10' 56" for the "missing section" and the fake "hercolubus image" (see my video for what is really at those coordinates in the missing image) and then 5h 42m 21s, +22d 36' 34.5" for the image of the T Tauri star and nebula. That's over 28 degrees different in declination and nearly 3 degrees different in right ascension. It's not in the "missing region" at all. Here's my telescope's image of the missing region, it's less than a degree in length in declination:
[link to nova.astrometry.net]

...

Sure! Absolutely, it's right in the URL I gave you for them.

[link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)]
[link to archive.stsci.edu (secure)]
5 42 21.235, +22 36 47.07
Note, of course, that in his video he doesn't have the star+nebula perfectly centered, so his coordinates won't be a perfect match, but the important thing is that it hasn't moved between those images decades apart. Here is astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 90's image.
[link to nova.astrometry.net]
And here is the astrometry confirming the coordinates from the 1951 image:
[link to nova.astrometry.net]