THE SECOND SUN IS HERE...? Confirmed by Keshe and NASA.Page 25 Update Page 1 ..10/5/2017 Stereo Ahead COR 2 Crazy Image. WTF.? UPDATED ....WTAF

Google Sky, WikiSky, and WWT are not a primary source for any sky survey data. They are second hand sources which took existing sky survey data and stitched it (which is why real researchers do NOT use them as primary source material for sky survey data). Specifically, they stitched the IRIS reprocessing of the IRAS data where Saturn was omitted since it is not pertinent to the sky survey. IRAS had to survey as much of the sky as it could within a year's time frame before its cryogenic coolant was exhausted. That did not leave time for Saturn to "move out of the way" of that area of the sky. Thus IRAS ended up scanning Saturn twice while surveying the sky. It is NOT covered up, you can see it just fine in the original IRAS survey data.
[link to skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]

That's exactly what i,m referring too.The 3 orblike crescent shape planet like debris.

Or lens flare ?

Bullshit. You really want to start this again? I received NOTHING.
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]


It WAS a callout, you called me and others by our screen names, and you lied by claiming to have sent me the link days ago. Drop it. Now.
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I'm tired of your bullshit. This is why we don't allow callouts.

Why in the image you posted does Venus dim in brightness once the lens flare? Crescent shaped planet like debris is in front of it ?

No. It doesn't dim. One image is higher res than the others and therefore sharper, making Venus look smaller in that shot.

Lets just hope it's not as dumb as the first son...

That's why I do not trust astromut. He has the ability to do as he pleases. His anger bleeds through from the start. It really is a shame people.

Why wouldn't they all be Hi Res ?

It is a shame.
He actually used to very useful in these threads.

He does have some excellent knowledge.

His ego has taken over completely now.

Any opinion on the Image ?

More examples of why we don't do callouts. Do I need to shut your thread down?

No you don't have too shut it down Astro.
Just leave the thread alone and let us delude ourselves.

What's so difficult about that.

If tards wanna tard then let us tard ffs.

Do you find NASA or Astrodude trusworthy?

35 pages of nibiru crap now....... OP`s on a roll.

Google Sky, WikiSky, and WWT are not a primary source for any sky survey data. They are second hand sources which took existing sky survey data and stitched it (which is why real researchers do NOT use them as primary source material for sky survey data). Specifically, they stitched the IRIS reprocessing of the IRAS data where Saturn was omitted since it is not pertinent to the sky survey. IRAS had to survey as much of the sky as it could within a year's time frame before its cryogenic coolant was exhausted. That did not leave time for Saturn to "move out of the way" of that area of the sky. Thus IRAS ended up scanning Saturn twice while surveying the sky. It is NOT covered up, you can see it just fine in the original IRAS survey data.
[link to skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]