WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage

didn't think too much of it being a "hoax" until now. What are they hiding? Victims dead. Killer dead. Why should "evidence" be deleted?

You better believe it; 5 more days til September. Tis the season.

What difference does it make..anyone with half a brain that's been following this event knows its totally fake and laughable.

Did they learn to do that from Hillary?

She said to "get more evidence of who the shooter " then was cut off. not asked for.. But you get the gist.

Last Edited by Esoterica on 08/27/2015 05:42 PM

would u say the shooting took place at sunrise?
bcuz local sunrise yesterday was reported to be 645am

LOL

Where're you from AC; anytown, U.S.A.?
Sounds like a swell place.
I'd like to go there--but it is far, far away from here.

The "evidence" deletion is explained above.

Why did you feel the need to make up a story about me because of what I posted? Something is not right about that too.

What's your agenda here?

RT = Realism Transposed

such a propaganda tool.

some of you get too much fluoride in your water and watch too much TV. some times shit just happens. i dont care if this is a conspiracy web site, some of you are just batshit crazy.

Common practice would be to confiscate the card so they could have more evidence. Not says it contains evidence and have them delete. Makes no sense. Imo

Thanks.

Too many cops are incompetent boobs these days.

People have the right to film in public. Period.

Wow, Russia Today? The news source that NEVER lies or exaggerates? This is to be taken seriously. This is me taking this seriously. You should all take this seriously. Has anyone checked with the World Weekly Star for corroboration?

The reporters could prove they aren't lying...It sounds like a simple delete operation was performed....If they don't use the device further, the video data should still be retrievable, right?

Recover the video and broadcast it into the inter-webs.

It's actually not explained. Just because it's 'common practice,' doesn't make it legit. Especially in such a high profile event. Come on.

Sorry but this asshole is BS too.

the video journalist (Strasser):

"Strasser said that he decided to delete the footage because “it was either not being able to work for the rest of the day, without camera or car, or delete crappy footage from far away.” He added that he “chose the latter.”...(MO - Oh boohoo, you can't work for the rest of the day - we'll see you in the poor house!!! crybaby! - Apparently he'll never go to jail to protect his sources!)

^^^what a bunch of f-in BS lazy ass video journalist!!

Hell, I could contact my employer (that is if I was actually a good/great video journalist!) and say my car, camera and all was confiscated at the scene - --come get me, bring me another camera and I can continue with my work day here....what a bunch of BS!

Oh gee, maybe they should have instant download to the station if shit like this might happen!!!!

Gawd I hate this f-in corrupt BS media!!!!!

Just to make fun of people who think TV is real life, is all. Nothing personal, I assure you. I can enjoy the entertainment of professional wrestling--but I don't try to tell myself that it is real. Why are you all so emotionally involved in things that are pure speculation? The hoaxers actually have something to lose, so I understand where they are coming from; but if your side is right--what do you gain exept a race war and a (more) totalitarian regime?

Get fucked.

Agreed, Head state trooper in sandy hook,fired!!!!shortly after the false flag

maybe check with Socrcha Faal too? lol

nothing is right on this one

They weren't destroying actual evidence. They were destroying footage the guy had of them on the scene gathering evidence.

Now if the guy happened to be on the scene and filmed the car crashing or something like that, then you would have something here.

All that occurred though was the cop making him destroy footage that if it went public could have revealed info to the public prior to the case being processed and what not.

It's not as of the footage captured anything the cops didn't gather as evidence already or were in the process of doing.

And yes, the cop apparently didn't have the right to make the reporter delete the footage. Like I said, he overstepped his bounds by doing that. But again, cops behaving like that in general isn't all that uncommon. Many of them tend to abide their position of power or actually believe they are allowed to do certain things that aren't actually legal.

Part of the reason they behave that way though is because they rarely get in trouble for it anyhow.

Last Edited by TakingCues on 08/27/2015 06:00 PM

Yessir Officer.

The new normal. A new reality has been created.

Your RIGHTS are what they SAY they are. Unless you're willing to use force to protect your RIGHTS. which we never do, cause we're a bunch of sjw pussies.

they do not want anyone messing with the PsyOp.

Lets stay friendly please. Ignore the idiots

That in itself is evidence. Do you not think HOW evidence is gathered is important in a case? Police mishandling of evidence, for example. Many a case has been thrown out for that very reason.