| Users Online Now: 1,662 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 538,739 | |
| Pageviews Today: 895,536 | Threads Today: 323 | Posts Today: 5,828 |
| 10:32 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,662 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 538,739 | |
| Pageviews Today: 895,536 | Threads Today: 323 | Posts Today: 5,828 |
| 10:32 AM | ||
Globe Earth, Flat Earth, Hollow Earth - Maybe they are ALL correct? | |
| Copernica Offer Upgrade  User ID: 46380617  United States11/04/2015 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 46380617 United States11/04/2015 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70072543  Japan11/04/2015 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43714481 United States11/04/2015 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 46380617 United States11/04/2015 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now THAT'S some out of the box thinking here... The equator is not the hottest but the coldest. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43714481 Sounds crazy and unbelievable but I don't believe any of it so go on sir! Lol Out of the box got me a 1-star bandit.  But anyway... yeah coldest spot is a problem. But if the world is more than we know it is, then maybe it's positioned differently or wobbles differently? I mean, what we think we know may be all wrong when we double the size of the planet right? Gotta give me time. My theory isn't even a day old yet!!  Last Edited by Copernica the Proud American on 11/04/2015 07:34 PM God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Saturn Dryness User ID: 42336370  Puerto Rico11/05/2015 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 42336370 Puerto Rico11/05/2015 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Abyss Lady User ID: 69677609  Latvia11/05/2015 03:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And even the Game of Thrones is correct about THE ICE WALL and the evils lurking beyond it! :D If it's a fraction of a sphere, then it can't be a full half as then the 50mile + line of sight experiments would not be possible. The radius then is much larger than the supposed ~6.3k km. The Wrath is going to be Endless |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 46380617 United States11/05/2015 03:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And even the Game of Thrones is correct about THE ICE WALL and the evils lurking beyond it! :D Quoting: Abyss Lady If it's a fraction of a sphere, then it can't be a full half as then the 50mile + line of sight experiments would not be possible. The radius then is much larger than the supposed ~6.3k km. Winter is coming!! And then I'm lost. Nothing we can see or measure has changed. We're just the flat earth map on a sphere that's twice as large as we thought. God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567  Russia11/05/2015 07:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So when I was looking around at stuff last night, I had a thought. Quoting: Copernica What if we do live on a sphere - but ONLY the top half of it? So the flat earthers have the map right but we're curved. The Flat Earth's Antarctic barrier is actually our equator and is indeed a barrier. That would mean there's a whole other "world" on the bottom half. Which could also give credence to the hollow earth theory. Caves or some other type of entrance doesn't take you to a hollow earth, but to the other 1/2 of this one. What do you think? "So above as below" OP, what if all of that is incorrect? What's next? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1607349 United States11/05/2015 07:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It might actually be more like a UFO, with our entire "world" on one side, and the "hollow earth" world on the other. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/05/2015 07:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a feeling that old "we live on a giant turtle" myth was created from trying to tell primitive people its not a sphere, but it's not flat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1607349 It might actually be more like a UFO, with our entire "world" on one side, and the "hollow earth" world on the other. And what holds water on the outer(convex) side in this case? Don't say it's because of gravity - as gravity would attract water inside the bowl-like concave container. |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 38293078 United States11/05/2015 08:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So when I was looking around at stuff last night, I had a thought. Quoting: Copernica What if we do live on a sphere - but ONLY the top half of it? So the flat earthers have the map right but we're curved. The Flat Earth's Antarctic barrier is actually our equator and is indeed a barrier. That would mean there's a whole other "world" on the bottom half. Which could also give credence to the hollow earth theory. Caves or some other type of entrance doesn't take you to a hollow earth, but to the other 1/2 of this one. What do you think? "So above as below" OP, what if all of that is incorrect? What's next? Good question. I guess we start again from scratch? God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 38293078 United States11/05/2015 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a feeling that old "we live on a giant turtle" myth was created from trying to tell primitive people its not a sphere, but it's not flat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1607349 It might actually be more like a UFO, with our entire "world" on one side, and the "hollow earth" world on the other. And what holds water on the outer(convex) side in this case? Don't say it's because of gravity - as gravity would attract water inside the bowl-like concave container. But isn't that exactly what we're told now in the round earth theory? God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/05/2015 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a feeling that old "we live on a giant turtle" myth was created from trying to tell primitive people its not a sphere, but it's not flat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1607349 It might actually be more like a UFO, with our entire "world" on one side, and the "hollow earth" world on the other. And what holds water on the outer(convex) side in this case? Don't say it's because of gravity - as gravity would attract water inside the bowl-like concave container. But isn't that exactly what we're told now in the round earth theory? Well the phenomenon of gravity still exists - and it's actually the starting point for everything else. For example, if you take a look at the geoid model, then the point of it is that vector of gravity has slightly different direction everywhere on Earth and it depends on local circumstances and also on local gravity anomalies. Which says that Earth is not perfectly round - it's rather a complex shape. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/05/2015 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So when I was looking around at stuff last night, I had a thought. Quoting: Copernica What if we do live on a sphere - but ONLY the top half of it? So the flat earthers have the map right but we're curved. The Flat Earth's Antarctic barrier is actually our equator and is indeed a barrier. That would mean there's a whole other "world" on the bottom half. Which could also give credence to the hollow earth theory. Caves or some other type of entrance doesn't take you to a hollow earth, but to the other 1/2 of this one. What do you think? "So above as below" OP, what if all of that is incorrect? What's next? Good question. I guess we start again from scratch? There is also a theory which says we're in a simulation. And of course the main rule(or law) of it - is the law of gravity. It is purely a mathematical law because the force of gravity is defined numerically by exact number of material blocks . |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 38293078 United States11/05/2015 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a feeling that old "we live on a giant turtle" myth was created from trying to tell primitive people its not a sphere, but it's not flat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1607349 It might actually be more like a UFO, with our entire "world" on one side, and the "hollow earth" world on the other. And what holds water on the outer(convex) side in this case? Don't say it's because of gravity - as gravity would attract water inside the bowl-like concave container. But isn't that exactly what we're told now in the round earth theory? Well the phenomenon of gravity still exists - and it's actually the starting point for everything else. For example, if you take a look at the geoid model, then the point of it is that vector of gravity has slightly different direction everywhere on Earth and it depends on local circumstances and also on local gravity anomalies. Which says that Earth is not perfectly round - it's rather a complex shape. So the earth could be like a cupcake and we're the icing part? And how much we "bounce" or "sink" (light or heavy) depends on where we are in the swirly bits? God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/05/2015 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70732567 And what holds water on the outer(convex) side in this case? Don't say it's because of gravity - as gravity would attract water inside the bowl-like concave container. But isn't that exactly what we're told now in the round earth theory? Well the phenomenon of gravity still exists - and it's actually the starting point for everything else. For example, if you take a look at the geoid model, then the point of it is that vector of gravity has slightly different direction everywhere on Earth and it depends on local circumstances and also on local gravity anomalies. Which says that Earth is not perfectly round - it's rather a complex shape. So the earth could be like a cupcake and we're the icing part? And how much we "bounce" or "sink" (light or heavy) depends on where we are in the swirly bits? Search 'geoid'. Water surface follows the geoid model. |
| Copernica (OP) User ID: 38293078 United States11/05/2015 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well the phenomenon of gravity still exists - and it's actually the starting point for everything else. For example, if you take a look at the geoid model, then the point of it is that vector of gravity has slightly different direction everywhere on Earth and it depends on local circumstances and also on local gravity anomalies. Which says that Earth is not perfectly round - it's rather a complex shape. So the earth could be like a cupcake and we're the icing part? And how much we "bounce" or "sink" (light or heavy) depends on where we are in the swirly bits? Search 'geoid'. Water surface follows the geoid model. So...donut hole then? Sorry...I'm over tired and clearly hungry. Seriously. In our new theory - the geoid would just be 2x the size we currently thing it is. And it looks like a ball of playdough. I can go with that. But I still don't think gravity is what we've been told or works like they say it does. God Bless President TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69275467 United States11/05/2015 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/06/2015 08:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70732567 Well the phenomenon of gravity still exists - and it's actually the starting point for everything else. For example, if you take a look at the geoid model, then the point of it is that vector of gravity has slightly different direction everywhere on Earth and it depends on local circumstances and also on local gravity anomalies. Which says that Earth is not perfectly round - it's rather a complex shape. So the earth could be like a cupcake and we're the icing part? And how much we "bounce" or "sink" (light or heavy) depends on where we are in the swirly bits? Search 'geoid'. Water surface follows the geoid model. So...donut hole then? Sorry...I'm over tired and clearly hungry. Seriously. In our new theory - the geoid would just be 2x the size we currently thing it is. And it looks like a ball of playdough. I can go with that. But I still don't think gravity is what we've been told or works like they say it does. Exactly, gravity is not what we have been told - as gravity is a law. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69307097 United States11/06/2015 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/06/2015 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Abyss Lady User ID: 1274632 Latvia11/06/2015 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 45497394  United Kingdom11/06/2015 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/07/2015 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 45367290 United Kingdom11/07/2015 07:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since you've seen it from that point of view of 'higher spacial dimension' - does it spin? It is more like morphing than spinning. Best example is to look at [link to earth.nullschool.net] then drag along the equator. This is not how it looks, but best example with the current spacial limitations. Of course it may actually be me and the rest of this universe 'spinning'. Hard to know for sure. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732567 Russia11/07/2015 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since you've seen it from that point of view of 'higher spacial dimension' - does it spin? It is more like morphing than spinning. Best example is to look at [link to earth.nullschool.net] then drag along the equator. This is not how it looks, but best example with the current spacial limitations. Of course it may actually be me and the rest of this universe 'spinning'. Hard to know for sure. Then geocentric point of view is correct, too. |
| Rxel User ID: 9473222  Lithuania11/07/2015 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.imdb.com] movie Dirigible (1931) Notice, whoever researches North pole, 90% end in catastrophe. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70448890  Australia11/07/2015 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66967819 United States11/07/2015 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
