Win $100,000 by Proving Global Warming is Real

That's easy. Recorded data speaks for itself.

No

It does. Now, whether or not human activities have caused the increase is debatable, but the Earth has warmed as a whole.

a .5 deg c increase in 100 years is ENTIRELY debateable.

No! You have not analyzed the data? You are regurgitating what you have been told.

Nonlinear Trends
There is no a priori physical reason why the long-term trend in climate variables should be linear in time. Climatic time series often have trends for which a straight line is not a good approximation (e.g., Seidel and Lanzante, 2004). The residuals from a linear fit in time often do not follow a simple autoregressive or moving average process, and linear trend estimates can easily change when recalculated for shorter or longer time periods or when new data are added. When linear trends for two parts of a longer time series are calculated separately, the trends calculated for two shorter periods may be very different (even in sign) from the trend in the full period, if the time series exhibits significant
nonlinear behavior in time....
[link to www.ipcc.ch (secure)]

There is no reason why the temperature of the any point in the earth should average the same yesterday as it does tomorrow.

Yet it does.

Their has been no increase in global temperatures for about the last 18 years that's why the crooks behind it had to change the name to climate change.

Info Math

This is the mathematician with the contest...he is offering $100,000 to prove Global Warming is real.

[link to www.informath.org]

The $100,000 Contest Rules
It has often been claimed that alarm about global warming is supported by observational evidence. I have argued that there is no observational evidence for global-warming alarm: rather, all claims of such evidence rely on invalid statistical analyses.

Some people, though, have asserted that the statistical analyses are valid. Those people assert, in particular, that they can determine, via statistical analysis, whether global temperatures have been increasing more than would be reasonably expected by random natural variation. Those people do not present any counter to my argument, but they make their assertions anyway.

In response to that, I am sponsoring a contest: the prize is $100,000. In essence, the prize will be awarded to anyone who can demonstrate, via statistical analysis, that the increase in global temperatures is probably not due to random natural variation.
[link to www.informath.org]

Last Edited by Turkey456 on 11/29/2015 12:20 PM

No one will ever collect because it can't be done.

I believe you are right, now how to impress this on the globe at LARGE?

impossible as it is perpetual. There can be no constant unless you buy into digital reality.
Maybe today we are cooling.
tomorrow we could be warming.
Viewing a longer timeline we are nowhere near any peek warming.

Since satellite data collection began - much more accurate than terrestrial station data - there is no recorded warming on this globe that matches predictions on any level. Check it yourself.

That does not mean that climate does not change, why, we've warmed since the last (we moving through an ice age) ice age and all probability is that we will cool again.

You are brainwashed and have a closed mind. Not at all a scientific mindset.

Legislate against carbon and you sign your very existence over to corruption and stitch up your children's future; where there will be no freedom at all.

I warn you!

It seems like we have been BAMBOOZLED again by tptb.....to gain more order and control and $$$.

Total BS! In 10 years we will be talking about an ice age!!!

whenever they personify something and describe it only in figurative terms you know its bullshit.

The 2015 Paris Climate summit probably will cover CO2 emission limits, fines and penalties. More bullshit!

Seems to me like they are trying to starve plants from their food source .

Global warming. Ok.

Too bad we have the most ice coverage on both poles than ever recorded..

But it's ok believe whatever makes you feel comfortable

They will switch the narrative by the end of the year and climate change will become combatting global cooling. of course it will all be man made and still involve co2 emissions.

Carbon dioxide gives us this historical era of plenty. Plants are abundant and therefore, so is food - and oxygen given off by trees etc.

Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas - and they cling to that to scare you.

Here's an analogy: eating salt will raise your blood pressure so much that you WILL have a heart attack. Of course, not many of us eat so much of it that there is more salt than food. And you know what? You'll die without salt in your diet Fact. So would salt be a boogieman? Well yes, if you are inclined to 'spin' it that way.

agreed on all counts

Lol, are they really THIS desperate to find a story for global warming that isn't total shit?

no matter what they say , its just not possible to record the temperature everywhere all the time .
due to this fact those who seek to mislead can 'cherrypick' the statistics to suit their agenda .

That's generous, I thought the bastards would blame the coming cooling on Global Warming. They have the temerity.

Yep!

then why is someone putting up 100,000 (still unclaimed) if its that is the case?

are you claiming it?

Read again the posts you're answering to.

Look, they want to slap a global warming tax on all energy with the funds going to equalize the third world with the first world. When this is accomplished one form of govt can rule over all of it.
Anthropomorphic warming is false, the plan is going nowhere, so this is an attempt to get new blood in the research that can find some way, somehow, to convince people that these lies are the truth and the taxes can go forward.

Mt Pinatubo in the Phillipines erupted some years ago, The eruption threw more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than all of mankind's activities from the beginning of time to today.
All the crude oil ever extracted from the earth would fill Lake Mead to about 1/3 its current water level.
That ain't all that much, viewed on a global scale.

Global warming may go on, but men an do nothing about it, regardless of the tax rate.

yeh I see my mistake now, was directed at the person you were quoting..