Less than 50%

The initial objective is the massive depopulation in protecting at best the environment, which is tantamount to exclude from the fields of our possible use of any nuclear weapons which would be tantamount to inflicting some irreparable damage to our so small planet. which is to exclude from the scope of our possible use of any nuclear weapons that would inflict some irreparable damage to our planet so small. The resources that we have are few in number, but their cumulative efficiency is certain since in returning to resonance we will get what the military call a “multiplier effect of force”. It is the triptych. economic collapse, civil war and massive epidemics. The use of these three tools should allow us to eventually reduce the world population from 7-10 billion inhabitants. We think that to reach our objective of 500 million human beings alive is illusory and that in spite of all our efforts of reduction, pockets of survivors will remain almost everywhere throughout the planet. Nevertheless, these pockets should not raise us of major problems, at least at first because of their disorganization, their isolation and their incapacity to master all the techniques if only current because of their weak number should limit considerably their power of nuisance. We think that in some years many will disappear and that little who will remain will return more or less quickly to the wild in a few generations. Any group that threatens us is, in all cases, treated quickly.

Our main historic enemy to the implementation of our plan was obviously the national states. Globalization, globalization, European institutions, mass immigration were so many tools that we have used with great success for 30 years and now national identities and feelings of belonging were significantly reduced, as patriotic feelings. Money and ownership have become the core values of many. The politicization of the masses has been significantly reduced, nations as we hoped, become fragile and can now be destabilized from within.

We thus have to pursue with constancy the immigration policy allowing to make considerable masses of poor people come from the South into impoverished countries of the North. We have to with constancy make rise the most radical Islam to instigate at the most the hatreds and the dissension in the peoples. When we will bring economic collapse, then the most absurd that we have developed in each country lead most of these countries to large-scale civil wars where each community will be responsible for us to kill the largest number communitarianism members of the other community. When we shall provoke the economic collapse, then the most absurd communitarianism which we have developed in every country will conduct the largest part of these countries towards large-scale civil wars where every community will take charge for our account to kill the largest number of the members of the opposite community.

So of course, all this is the pure fiction…. and yet … If Mao said that a mouth to feed it was two useful arms, today he would say a mouth, it is always a mouth of excess, especially when there are 7 billions and when the arms, soon, will not be of no use any more. And Mao, the great humanist, what would he have done in such a context?
[link to jhaines6.wordpress.com (secure)]