Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,350 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 342,738
Pageviews Today: 730,528Threads Today: 302Posts Today: 6,129
10:16 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban

 
TrumpsRedHat
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 09:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
So the supreme kangaroo court will humor same sex marriage which is no where in the constitution but will completely ignore an infringement on the second amendment?


[link to www.usatoday.com]
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 09:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Scalia has failed me yet again

bump
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70983956
United Kingdom
12/07/2015 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Did the challenger not have "standing?"

drevil

That's the usual excuse.
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
rant
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70985374
United States
12/07/2015 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
Pony Up

User ID: 68474049
United States
12/07/2015 10:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


rere23
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70983956
United Kingdom
12/07/2015 10:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


1rof1

What a tard!

This is you! ---> tard
DARTH SILIOUS

User ID: 1527590
United States
12/07/2015 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


shill
Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The Force shall free me.

Or something
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


So you are saying assault weapons are not "arms" or are you saying you can't read?

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have foreseen the Internet or television, that you do not have the right to free speech through those mediums.

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have foreseen motor vehicles, that you don't have any fourth amendment protection.

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have seen.... You get the picture?

Your public education is absolutely astounding.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70350842
United States
12/07/2015 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


The internet wasn't invented either so does your freedom of speech not count on here?

Also the constitution doesn't say Anywhere that marriage shall not be infringed upon. You know the state isn't supposed to mix state and religion. It definitely says somewhere though that my right to bear arms shall not be infringed by you traitor commies.
Pony Up

User ID: 68474049
United States
12/07/2015 10:39 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Immediate solution would be to move or get some bugout property, learn to commute, there are alternatives.

That area will be a waste land before to long anyways.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70821298
United States
12/07/2015 10:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


Go fuck yourself libtard.
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Immediate solution would be to move or get some bugout property, learn to commute, there are alternatives.

That area will be a waste land before to long anyways.
 Quoting: Pony Up


Are you a Syrian refugee or what?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70208439
12/07/2015 10:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
It's more like a supreme dictatorship cabinet.
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
It's more like a supreme dictatorship cabinet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70208439


Something needs to happen to some of the members to remove them
Sungaze_At_Dawn

User ID: 70246439
Canada
12/07/2015 10:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


So you are saying assault weapons are not "arms" or are you saying you can't read?

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have foreseen the Internet or television, that you do not have the right to free speech through those mediums.

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have foreseen motor vehicles, that you don't have any fourth amendment protection.

This logic is like saying that because the founding fathers couldn't have seen.... You get the picture?

Your public education is absolutely astounding.
 Quoting: TrumpsRedHat


THIS!
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 66022894
United States
12/07/2015 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40915246
Australia
12/07/2015 11:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
100 rounds per second
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


100 rounds per second? I don't even think a mini gun can do that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5182823
United States
12/07/2015 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


It in the Bill of Rights genius. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Don't you see rights being infringed upon, I sure as hell do.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5182823
United States
12/07/2015 11:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


It in the Bill of Rights genius. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Don't you see rights being infringed upon, I sure as hell do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5182823


It doesn't say, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, unless the arms fire 100 rounds a second."
.
User ID: 24056301
United States
12/07/2015 12:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


It in the Bill of Rights genius. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Don't you see rights being infringed upon, I sure as hell do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5182823


It doesn't say, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, unless the arms fire 100 rounds a second."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5182823


.

U Can NOT Fix STUPID.

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68226614
United States
12/07/2015 12:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Obama owns them, They will do as his majesty orders.

They are not the supreme court of the united states republic
Broken Cord

User ID: 5435156
United States
12/07/2015 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


Your statement is baseless conjecture.

Assault rifle is a made up term for an agenda pushing left wing intent on the fall of America. The founding fathers would have had the leading rifle technology available. In their time it was a musket, today it would most likely be an AR platform type of rifle.
Disclosure.
:max:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5182823
United States
12/07/2015 12:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


It in the Bill of Rights genius. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Don't you see rights being infringed upon, I sure as hell do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5182823


It doesn't say, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, unless the arms fire 100 rounds a second."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5182823


.

U Can NOT Fix STUPID.

.
 Quoting: . 24056301


I see it more as severe cognitive dissonance, but stupid works as well. Cheers!
Tree of Life

User ID: 18534101
United States
12/07/2015 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ?

When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology.

The Founding Fathers never invisioned AR-15s that could fire 100 rounds per second would one day be sold in supermarkets (Walmart).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374


The founding Fathers would have welcomed the AR-15 and other such weapons,
as they were Militia Men!!!!!
Hence, the Second Amendment was born!

Might want to pick up a history book and inform yourself!

These are the very weapons we need in today's world, which is why gun sales are off the charts! Shit yes, the evil in our great land is terrified!

As usual, the American People vote with their pocketbooks!

They are buying guns and ammo, all expensive items, in a huge way!

Go home and think about this......

yoda Even Yoda knew how to defend himself!
"All you may know of heaven or hell is within your own self." - Edgar Cayce
ItsAllOneBigLie

User ID: 70941054
United States
12/07/2015 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled 2-1 in April that the city's ban was reasonable. "Unlike the District of Columbiaís ban on handguns, Highland Parkís ordinance leaves residents with many self defense options," the court majority said.

"If a ban on semi automatic guns and large capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting and makes the public feel safer as a result, thatís a substantial benefit," Judge Frank Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, wrote.

Why can people not understand that the only ones who will not have large capacity magazines and semi-automatic weapons will be the VICTIMS. Criminals do not follow laws. Why anyone would feel safer knowing that is beyond me.

Judge Daniel Manion dissented from that ruling. "While most persons do not require extraordinary means to defend their homes, the fact remains that some do," he said. "Ultimately, it is up to the lawful gun owner and not the government to decide these matters."

This guy knows what the hell he is talking about.

Last Edited by ItsAllOneBigLie on 12/07/2015 02:29 PM
"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion." - Albert Camus

"It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners." - Albert Camus

"The trouble is, you think you have time."
TrumpsRedHat  (OP)

User ID: 68719962
United States
12/07/2015 02:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
"If a ban on semi automatic guns and large capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting and makes the public feel safer as a result, thatís a substantial benefit," Judge Frank Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, wrote.

"


 Quoting: ItsAllOneBigLie


The PERCEIVED risk?! So even by admission, it has no factual basis for being this way. Just if the public feels it will.
ItsAllOneBigLie

User ID: 70941054
United States
12/07/2015 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
"If a ban on semi automatic guns and large capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting and makes the public feel safer as a result, thatís a substantial benefit," Judge Frank Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, wrote.

"


 Quoting: ItsAllOneBigLie


The PERCEIVED risk?! So even by admission, it has no factual basis for being this way. Just if the public feels it will.
 Quoting: TrumpsRedHat


No one said it made sense.
"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion." - Albert Camus

"It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners." - Albert Camus

"The trouble is, you think you have time."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37775658
United States
12/07/2015 02:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
Town in Ga has a law that every house must be armed.

[link to abcnews.go.com]





GLP