Mad World

:jebus:

She was hungry. Lay off.

Would a juicer of made a difference? lol

Haha :)
Did they do 3 day juice cleanses back then? :P

[link to www.smbc-comics.com]

Haha, oh geez.

was goggling the name for various reasons
and up pops this vid.

Anyone here (chuckle) with some imput on this?

Have you seen this video?



It ties in.

watchdd again for good measure =)

chock full, aint it lol

cheers

Dont expect anything mindboggling. Only Hollywood employs the twist and the drama to simple truth. It will be ironic though, like a midget in a suit of armor.



Boron and boron control rods for one and electronic and positronic decay if you are truly interested.

But we dont expect much from someone who had no clue that water itself was an insulator.

Obviously science and poignancy are not taught in troll school.

Cheers

I only drink on friday.

2 german bocks.

It takes the body six days to rid itself of alcohol and its byproducts.


Please don't try to cast yourself as an authority, even of the middlingly mundane.

It sure is lol :)

sure boron is used to clean nuclear rods, common knowledge!

but of course you left out any reference to your monopoles fleeting comment! lol

and what was the other scientific bs reference u made in the same post?

cornered like a rat! lol

a popmarked face cornichon! lol

ava9, 9 as got to be the number of hot dogs she can eat at a single sitting! lol

That you need to learn to read?

I made a statement, not a reference.

three strikes.

cheers idiot


Synonyms for reference
noun remark, citation

stating - as in a statement

here's the actual link, idiot!
[link to www.thesaurus.com]

still waiting for a link for fleeting monopole and your other bs scientific statement/comment/reference! lol

Look closer

[link to www.thesaurus.com]

Lol.

Now you can look up......positronic, electronic, oxidizing and static

Thank you for continually making my point.

While your'e at it dipole hemispheres and a visualization for a fleeting monopole, except in a time static environment?


Get your learn on.

Glad I could be of help chucklenutz.

Lol

A magnetic monopole is a hypothetical elementary particle in particle physics that is an isolated magnet with only one magnetic pole (a north pole without a south pole or vice versa). In more technical terms, a magnetic monopole would have a net "magnetic charge".

should I link it for you cheers! what don't you understand about hypothetical, idiot?

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]


i see you didn't any any kind of reference to "fleeting monopoles" did you? cheers idiot!

and a statement is synonymous with reference and comment! are you canuck? it would explain a lot! lol

go in reverse now canuck!

edit:

i see you didn't link any kind of reference to "fleeting monopoles" did you? cheers idiot!

[link to www.google.ca]




Lol, did they block google searches in the basement? At least try. They might let you out.


Lazy useless trolls. What strike is this? 5?

There should be lots to read in the above.

"Electromagnetic radiation depends on structural details of the source system of electric charge and electric current. Direct analysis can be intractable if the structure is unknown or complicated. Multipole analysis offers a way to separate the radiation into moments of increasing complexity. Since the electromagnetic field depends more heavily on lower-order moments than on higher-order moments, the electrom. agnetic field can be approximated without knowing the structure in detail."

^^^ that means its a guess!

"Since Maxwell's equations are linear, the electric field and magnetic field depend linearly on source distributions. Linearity allows the fields from various multipole moments to be calculated independently and added together to give the total field of the system. This is the well-known principle of superposition."

as per the uncertainity principle you know either location or velocity. again they are calculating velocity to make a locational moment guess. the reference is for using multipoles to calculate the suppose existence of a "moment of a monopole existence". its a far reach to take a whole entire structure's energy, base it on a hypothetical particle and claim the this energy leaves no trace and is gone in a nanosecond! lol. a particles responsible for the entire charge of an entire system, vanishes without a trace! lol it not quite proof of something they can't even say was there! lol

***************
"Multipole moments are calculated with respect to a fixed expansion point which is taken to be the origin of a given coordinate system. Translating the origin changes the multipola e moments of the system with the exception of the first non-vanishing moment.[4][5]

For example, the monopole moment of charge is simply the total charge in the system. Changing the origin will never change this moment.

If the monopole moment is zero then the dipole moment of the system will be translation invariant. If both the monopole and dipole moments are zero then the quadrupole moment is translation invariant, and so forth. **Because higher-order moments (monpole moments) depend on the position of the origin, they cannot be regarded as invariant properties of the system."
*************

the above pargraph is loaded with presumptive language and static black box algorythms "translation invarients", equations based on an end result measurement! it violates the uncertainity princle at its core. lol

********************
Because higher-order moments depend on the position of the origin, they cannot be regarded as invariant properties of the system."**********

this states that the higher moments can't be addressed or calculated, based on extrapolated translation invarients.

*************
"To account for these effects, the intrinsic magnetization of the system \mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x},t) would have to be taken into account. For simplicity however, these effects will be deferred to the discussion of generalized 'multipole' radiation."
**************

again, another admittance to simplistic guess work! and referred to multipoles not monopoles. lol


half way down the article you provided, please be so kind as to familize yourself with the information under the following subheader.

ELECTRIC MONOPOLE RADIATION NONEXISTENCE

maybe aether can explain this to or for you! lol

the remaining second half of the article delves into the hard science of dipole radiation! you really should read the article links you provide and try harder to understand them. this one didn't substantiate your assertion! lol

google keywords monopole hypothesis for some simple reading! lol

Incorrect.

your more stupid than i originally thought! lol

As stated quite plainly: Your reading comprehension is terrible. You'd be a terrible lawyer, nevermind a physicist.

My assertions are quite valid in the context I placed them.

Strike 6.

no problem, doesn't matter, you can fool most of the people here! lol

Lol, you and your mock authority. What exactly would I be fooling them into?

Or are we asserting a fictional moral high ground?

Exactly.

Thanks for playing ,however, ineptly.

hey canuck, are you wearing your wife's panties, they must be climbing all up your crack! lol

When in doubt, prattle aimlessly.

hey canuck, anymore scientific insights? lol