Mad World

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Sometimes you should pay attention to who's delivering the message, and why.
Wonder what laws he's thinking of "rolling back"

it might be satan or an alien huh

no one has to wait for Mars we can ignite it here easy oeaxy technically

is there justice for everyone in that

Who are you claiming is Satan now?
You know I don't buy into that book, right?

Depends on how it's operated.
Free and educated citizens voting, or similar climate to now where you can convince people to vote ageist their best interests because of a fear factor
"We must lower corporate taxes for trickle down effect!"
Record profits, even more homeless

lovley
do you enjoy the notion of it functioning here on earth for and on behalf of modern man
all of us

It's not the system used, but the people in charge of it and their intentions.
Virtually every style of government has had success if those in charge have the right motives, and likewise they've all failed when the wrong motives lead the way

really

does it never cross your mind that it is beyond us and it always was
it being that which describe that never is

thus ai is direct democracy with no people in charge of in charge

that we possess the technology to do now

it is currently in the philosophy department becoming humanised

Speaking in rather broad strokes here without getting into the nitty-gritty of course.
Theoretically they all work - lots of empires throughout history with various levels of success that demonstrate it, as well as examples where my point of those in charge being a cornerstone to the whole affair can lead it to rather rapid destruction. A modern example being near 30trillion in debt and unwanted wars, despite electing people for over a decade that campaigned on ending those wars.
And while there may be geopolitical motivations for why such things can change when a person reaches office without simply hand waving "empty promises to garner votes", keeping the citizens in the dark over such would be no different then convincing musks democracy voters to go to war via government/interests propoganda

Depends on the programming, so to speak.
No different then humans really - may be able to form its own conclusions, but that depends not only upon the above, but also the information presented to it.

Co-operation would be the way to go

likley america being our system leader will be the first to switch to it and russia with china can agree to that and switch themselves by uniting their systems to fit america and the rest will agree
civilian only system

that sort of thing

we have a few things going on now we are in year 3

steo by step

Last Edited by aether on 01/11/2022 08:45 PM

There's a great comment on your Musk clip

exploration of space cannot even begin without togetherness/service to others. just like in farms of animals, service to others is claimed by poor billionaires (dough, in clear service to themselves). the galactic community would not even remotely allow us there until we show at least first traces of planetary intelligence.

Getting to the point of requiring open cooperation and an entirely new system, not the same one with a few extra bells and whistles added on

It's earth.
Not america
Not China
Not my group
All groups

Avoid debt default and remain world leader, fucking hell.
Let's cold war again!

seriously please read what is said you read like a troll or anarchist or negative nelly or bully

It's almost like looking at how things are run, such as the public face presented by America, does not inspire confidence as them presenting as world leaders, anymore then china's current system.

Rather not go into massive debt because a hospital is required for a simple example

You can skip my posts if you'd like =)

Most have seemingly forgotten what the genuine honing of positions, beliefs and ideas look like without taking any eventual friction overly personal.

This old proverb is eternally valid, imho:

“Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of another.”

We all learn to varying degrees in different ways, of course, but even at it's most gentle - as long as we remain sentient beings - genuine learning will produce friction.

I'll openly admit I often take this adage to it's rough edges, but only because I learn the most from others in doing so.

That said, I think you elucidate your particular positions well, and although I may not personally agree with all of them, I can still appreciate your style of argument (in the classical sense) without taking them as a direct and vicious personal repudiation.


Keep up the good honest fight Sol - because it's the only good fight there is.



Last Edited by Vafþrúðnir on 01/11/2022 11:25 PM

stop asking such direct and simple questions, it confuses the master, apparently :)

Thank you for saying as much
Got no problem having a bit of a spar, and if my manner is direct and offends, or in your example rougher iron that catches others edges, I can live with that

He's still learning.

We all are.

in deed

Why don't you show us what you're learning or teaching, and leave me out of it...

You obviously missed the more important part, of the extent of my reach when correcting children.

The range of my influence.

So show me children, your mastery.

I smell farts every time you post