While I wait

Lol

we both netherland sbt

awwwww

WORDS CAST SPELLS
(That's why it's called spelling)
Words are energy, be wise about them

Consider this:
In spanish, the word for a "sentences" is "oraciones";
the word for "praying" is "oraciones".

This is not a coincidence, happens a lot with language
and what many language concepts actually mean.

So many people say things that mean not what they think that mean.

Mass stupification and ambiguity of context are powerful magick

-----

Very early on I've seen some other things change after the initial correct post.
It's Godlike Productions, is it not?

:magik:

us on the surface of gaia have gathered so much information we had no idea what our discoveries mean
now our tools have got quick we are looking at 50 years of data in every field of endeavour again and again and again at light speed forming overview off all we knew
layer upon layer upon meaning forming meaning like 3d printing philosophy

sort of thing

all meaning arrive as theorems with supporting evidence of theorem truth at that time layer
theorems are vertical
proofs horizontal

there is familiarity of ingredients in the storyline and its content works for me and outcome fair it seems to me

You did it on purpose! You have universal powers!

At least you also can be 'anonymous' again...
Even with 'names' we are anonymous.

Who is 'Aether'?

And that is the charming mystery of internet.

How did internet start? Who invented the wheel? It is all so very interesting!
The wheel was a kind of logic. Was it? The internet. Sigh! It took a long way...But who invented the first ways? The first telegraph, the first telephone? Who thought of the first step?

How could ANYONE invent a wheel?

yes
we are living it through like we knew we do

gosh

But we don't. That is the tragedy...

to beginnings!

divide everything once causes eight different ways to structure the origin

see what base line 2 plus synergy 3 does do

borderlines

base line 2
start line 3

yes

new beginnings are never something from nothing

An eternal infinite in space universe doesn't violate the second law of thermodynamics just as much as animal homeostasis does. It only means that the universe is either a closed or open system, and as far as we know, that is impossible to prove because in mathematics infinity can be a cardinality, or a limit.

A limit would mean that it's an open system, ever-expanding, even though it is infinitely large, while a cardinality would mean that it is closed--yet infinite itself! I tend to think of infinity as a cardinality due to the fact that infinity itself can contain infinity--to infinity... so, the ultimate infinity is the cardinality of the Continuum, or C.

5 sets of 90 days sequence is request agreeable to me

We believe that the change in psycho-emotional status is indirectly responsible for the cognitive abilities shift

hello
the wait makes more sense to me now because what i'm waiting for is currently occurring to me causing me to experience this time experience and describe in this thread

my precognition from my past never experiences the same when I reach it in my future like it did when I knew I would experience it from my past in my future which is today this moment in my present

so its like a very long deja vu that provides all the right experience in the right sequence
but
because I am in it and not remote sensing it from my past I am not reacting in real life exactly as I saw myself before I did this what I am doing right now
you were in the vision but not doing what we are doing which is talking
you are known to me in my precognition similar to how we do know each other
we talk sometimes
but I wasn't knowing what about or when or why we do

and because I'm not exactly the same either to how i was two years ago all the dynamics between me and other people like yourself frequently react to me different to how I prophesied
so
what comes over the next 102 weeks approx will vary visibly from prophesy that caused its self to self organize into itself in our present

that is my long answer to question I never imagined being asked until you did

And you can disprove maths with philosophy, physics with philosophy and philosophy with philosophy. Philosophy is the mother of science. If we didn't philosophize the Scientific Method, where would science be now? And if we don't philosophize whenever we form hypotheses and theories, where would science be? Mathematics is not a tool of creating science, it is a tool of describing science. Experiment is a way of testing and creating hypotheses and gaining observations. You cannot gain an observation by using mathematics solely unless the mathematics is tied to experiment and derived from experiment.

It is impossible to confirm, observe, measure, or disprove a steady state universe that is either open or closed, agreed. In this it is not a scientific theory. This is a just criticism of the BB also.

In my view, no one in a scientific frame of mind, upon reflection, would make a prediction that the universe will never grow old, fade, break down, or suffer futility and decay in cosmological time. There is not enough supporting evidence or knowledge about the circuit which is sustaining the heat, light, motion and possibly self-replication of these beautiful cosmic structures.

But a lot of people -- very fine people, esp. around here -- appear to argue that the Steady State Universe is very likely or Probable. It is not enough to make a metaphysical decision about the possible temporal and spacial qualities of the physical universe, and support it by indicating it is Probable. That does not meet the standard of either a scientific theory or empirical evidence. It is a nice idea, tho.

[link to www.thunderbolts.info]

we're on it

all meaning arrive as theorems with supporting evidence of theorem truth at that time layer
theorems are vertical
proofs horizontal

theorems move through truth

gap moment
is it quick enough
i say no

instant says between moments exist moment to moment causing moment experience to exist

instant philosophy