The Republican candidates and the basic biological fact of EVOLUTION | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10797751 Germany 02/02/2016 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 33903191 United States 02/02/2016 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and here i thought it was still the "THEORY of evolution" and not a natural law. but what the fuck do i know? Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 735982 United States 02/02/2016 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71356427 United Kingdom 02/02/2016 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62118065 United States 02/02/2016 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have recently come across Stefan Molyneux's application of R/K selection theory to politics. It is quite interesting. I dont really buy into the evolutionary woo that gets espoused though. Evolutionary theory is the logic used for exterminating the lot of you. Its the justification for eugenics and transhumanism. I don't understand why people would want to embrace something like that. Evolution says that the NWO are better than you and have the right to rule you. Keep building that transhumanist utopia for the elite while the rest of you fight for scraps (See the film Elysium). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47588086 United States 02/02/2016 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10797751 Germany 02/02/2016 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is not a scientific fact, just a widely accepted theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10797751 The mechanism of natural selection is theorized to explain the observed FACT of evolution. Darwin called it the theory of evolution. You like making shit up, you liar. |
SeveNation User ID: 70394619 United States 02/02/2016 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Scientific Law of Biogenesis: The Law of biogenesis states that life can only come from life. Not nonliving matter. The Theory of Evolution states that life came from "primordial soup", ie, nonliving matter. So you have a theory that defies a scientific law. To recap: Frog turns into Prince = Fairy Tale not Science. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is not a scientific fact, just a widely accepted theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10797751 The mechanism of natural selection is theorized to explain the observed FACT of evolution. Darwin called it the theory of evolution. Yes he did, but we're no longer in the 19th century. Evolution has been observed and verified so many thousands of times, in the wild and in the laboratory, that it's simply a fact now, on par with the "theory" of gravity. [link to www.talkorigins.org] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Scientific Law of Biogenesis: Quoting: SeveNation 70394619 The Law of biogenesis states that life can only come from life. Not nonliving matter. The Theory of Evolution states that life came from "primordial soup", ie, nonliving matter. So you have a theory that defies a scientific law. To recap: Frog turns into Prince = Fairy Tale not Science. I guess that settles that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71356427 United Kingdom 02/02/2016 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Scientific Law of Biogenesis: Quoting: SeveNation 70394619 The Law of biogenesis states that life can only come from life. Not nonliving matter. The Theory of Evolution states that life came from "primordial soup", ie, nonliving matter. So you have a theory that defies a scientific law. To recap: Frog turns into Prince = Fairy Tale not Science. The primordial soup is part of an abiogenesis hypothesis and has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. The " law of biogenesis" was an observation by Pasteur that spontaneous generation was an incorrect hypothesis as to why food spoiled etc. |
SeveNation User ID: 70394619 United States 02/02/2016 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.apologeticspress.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58686169 United States 02/02/2016 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 64158988 United States 02/02/2016 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58686169 United States 02/02/2016 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is not a scientific fact, just a widely accepted theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10797751 The mechanism of natural selection is theorized to explain the observed FACT of evolution. Oh please... I can provide several examples how libtards like you fucked up big time... 1) Saturated fat and cholesterol consumption causing heart disease... False. 2) Sun scare to avoid skin cancer.... false. 3) Global warming caused by CO2.... False... Hence, evolution theory as we know it is likely wrong... Plus you always leave out micro and macro evolution so you fail. |
Mystic Gohan User ID: 71377088 Australia 02/03/2016 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58686169 United States 02/03/2016 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is not a scientific fact, just a widely accepted theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10797751 Learn the difference. Idiot. Evolution is a fact, the theory explains it. Micro is widely accepted... Macro is where the problem started... Idiots like you fail to explain the macro part. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71316722 Belgium 02/03/2016 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Scientific Law of Biogenesis: Quoting: SeveNation 70394619 The Law of biogenesis states that life can only come from life. Not nonliving matter. The Theory of Evolution states that life came from "primordial soup", ie, nonliving matter. So you have a theory that defies a scientific law. To recap: Frog turns into Prince = Fairy Tale not Science. The primordial soup is part of an abiogenesis hypothesis and has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. The " law of biogenesis" was an observation by Pasteur that spontaneous generation was an incorrect hypothesis as to why food spoiled etc. Evolution (what you believe to be true), is what happens once you actually have life (read biogenesis). According to the casual evotard, abiogenesis gave rise to biogenesis. Seemingly, the evotard, has no problem to accept that life actually came from non-life. (This is not healthy. This is not logical. Basically, this is against the very nature of science.) You sir, are the prime example. How can you claim evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis? To give a quick overview, how I see your belief on evolution: 1) nothing 2) abiogenesis 3) biogenesis 4) evolution How you see your belief and explain it to others: 1) biogenesis 2) evolution In other words, the die hard evotard, will claim nothingness gave rise to matter, matter gave rise to life and life evolved. In your wothers, the casual evotard, you claim life suddenly appeared without any predecessor and this life simply evolved over time. Just, fucking, brilliant. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65965026 United States 02/05/2016 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71233689 United States 02/05/2016 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71401895 United States 02/05/2016 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68472714 United States 02/05/2016 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65965026 United States 02/05/2016 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the problem with your natural selection comeback is it was not observed in humans, in case you hadn't noticed...we are a bit different than every other species on this rock. If we supposedly evolved from primates via natural selection...then why the hell are they still here? Why didn't they evolve as well? I'm not saying we weren't created without the use of their DNA or a ancient terrestrial hominid, but we did not evolve directly from them via natural selection. We are quite un-natural. Intelligently designed. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68472714 The old "Why are monkeys still here?" argument... |
Mystic Gohan User ID: 71408792 Australia 02/06/2016 05:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is not a scientific fact, just a widely accepted theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10797751 Learn the difference. Idiot. Evolution is a fact, the theory explains it. Micro is widely accepted... Macro is where the problem started... Idiots like you fail to explain the macro part. To scientists there is only evolution. Micro and Macro are not different methods of change. Its evolution deniers who want to think macroevolution is some magical phenomenon. To scientists who do use the terms (they are really outdated, they prefer not to use them as they have been hijacked by creationists) microevolution is change within a species, macroevolution is change of species and above, as in speciation, which is caused by microevolution in isolated populations of species. Last Edited by Kakarot_ on 02/06/2016 06:02 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1466961 United States 02/06/2016 06:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1466961 United States 02/06/2016 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ben Carson Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64158988 “I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the Adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct." Mike Huckabee "If anyone wants to believe that they are descendants of a primate, they are certainly welcome to do it. I don’t know how far they want to march that back.” Rick Santorum "I think there are a lot of problems with the theory of evolution, and do believe that it is used to promote a worldview that is anti-theist, that is atheist.” Rick Perry "I am a firm believer in Intelligent Design as a matter of faith and intellect, and I believe it should be presented in schools alongside the theories of evolution." Ted Cruz “There is nothing scientific about evolution. Evolution is one of the strongest tools of Marxism because if they can convince you that you came from a monkey, it’s much easier to convince you that God does not exist." Chris Christie Thinks public schools should be allowed to confuse students by teaching creationism. John Kasich Thinks public schools should be allowed to confuse students by teaching creationism. Jeb Bush Has said evolution should not be taught in school. Has also said that students should be presented with "varying viewpoints." Rand Paul Reluctantly conceded, "Obviously, we evolved." Carly Fiorina No comment Donald Trump No one has asked him. Scott Walker "I'm going to punt." Marco Rubio "I'm not a scientist, man." Bobby Jindal "I'm not an evolutionary biologist," and schools should be allowed to teach creationism. ...and then? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1466961 United States 02/06/2016 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ben Carson Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64158988 “I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the Adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct." Mike Huckabee "If anyone wants to believe that they are descendants of a primate, they are certainly welcome to do it. I don’t know how far they want to march that back.” Rick Santorum "I think there are a lot of problems with the theory of evolution, and do believe that it is used to promote a worldview that is anti-theist, that is atheist.” Rick Perry "I am a firm believer in Intelligent Design as a matter of faith and intellect, and I believe it should be presented in schools alongside the theories of evolution." Ted Cruz “There is nothing scientific about evolution. Evolution is one of the strongest tools of Marxism because if they can convince you that you came from a monkey, it’s much easier to convince you that God does not exist." Chris Christie Thinks public schools should be allowed to confuse students by teaching creationism. John Kasich Thinks public schools should be allowed to confuse students by teaching creationism. Jeb Bush Has said evolution should not be taught in school. Has also said that students should be presented with "varying viewpoints." Rand Paul Reluctantly conceded, "Obviously, we evolved." Carly Fiorina No comment Donald Trump No one has asked him. Scott Walker "I'm going to punt." Marco Rubio "I'm not a scientist, man." Bobby Jindal "I'm not an evolutionary biologist," and schools should be allowed to teach creationism. ...and then? ...and then? |