|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Female Genital Mutilation 200 Million girls
|
|
Poster Handle
|
SeaCharger |
|
Post Content
|
...
personal attack much?
Quoting: nikki nikita Go back and read through all your posts. When do you provide links to back up your opinions? You don't. And we are not all men on this thread. I'm a woman who wants other women to consider what we have permitted as OK in the US while looking at other countries and judging their cultural practices. The reason why we have to bring up MGM whenever FGM is brought up is because of our huge hypocrisy around the issue. We cannot continue to say FGM is wrong when we still support and practice MGM. 40 years ago, my father did not want me to get circumcised, my mother agreed that it should be the father's choice though she had the "hygiene bias" (if a woman can keep her internal organs hygienic, a man can certainly clean under his foreskin), there was so much pressure from hospital staff that made them read biased literature and talked of locker room mockery that my parents relented. That is media bias, pure and simple. Cutting off part of a child for any reason other than to save its life is wrong, period. End of argument. I'm sorry for your situation. if your mother had her clitoris removed as a girl she probably wouldn't have had children. again, the topic is FGM. So you need to have a clitoris to have children? How are all the circumcised women continuing the tradition if they can't have children? Again, you're not educating yourself on this topic.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
