Sorry - Evolution-Tards...Another Smack-Down - For Your "Theory"....

Evolution has to be one of the dumbest theories ever.

It is such absurd on its face, it boggles the mind.

The complexity of a single living cell is incredible. Let alone whole organisms.

Anyone who studies it with an open mind, wether in medicine or biology must be brought to his knees, because he sees the creators mind directly infront of him.

OP is an idiot. It's just another discovery to be investigated. Can't see how it's of interest to the god squad. Even if evolution was wrong it wouldn't bring any one of the world's 4000+ religions a single step closer to being a viable alternative.

"a single step closer to being a viable alternative."

I would say that a "super-intelligence" that Religion-Tards refer to as GOD...

GOD is the ONLY Alternative.

/

disproving evolution does not automatically prove god.

May not prove, but offers the only other reasonable explanation.

And its based on extra-terrestrial contact from dimensional superior beings.

Absurd is an understatement.

To evolve is to grow in knowledge and understanding of the world around you. For most psychological evolution is not possible because they allow their minds to be limited by parameters of others. Essentially your minds are being controlled artificially to the point where you stopped all critical thinking and you are unable to change your environment.

In religion asking questions is taboo and those that do are considered a heretics. Religion is controlled by charlatans and these people have kept and hindered others from the truth since the whole scam was conceived. It would behoove the OP and other readers to ask what "Evolution" really is, only then will evolution be achieved!

The mind changes the body and both change your environment. Compare Rome two-thousand years ago and Africa today. What stopped these people from creating a better existence? What stops them now?

It's all the power of the mind...



Go ahead and prove me wrong.

...

Well yes, the theory that evolution deniers reject is absurd. Its a good thing it has nothing to do with the actual scientific theory.

And vice versa...

Epigenetics (epi - the Greek prefix meaning ‘on top of’) is the study of how genes are switched on or off. It is thought to be one explanation for how our environment and behaviour, such as our diet or smoking habit, can affect our DNA and how these changes may even be passed down to our children and grandchildren.
From the original: [link to www.cam.ac.uk]

If you read it carefully, you'll understand(hopefully) that it doesn't "smack down" evolution, it actually ENFORCES it.

evolutionists are as bad as religious people

evolutionists can't explain how a giraffe got a long neck. Nor how an elephant got it's trunk and big ears. Among countless other things.

There is no model for a computer that can tell us how evolution would function, because it's an imaginary idea that is in the mind of evolutionists, not an actual reality

You know, we as humans, are too prone to be dualistic. Is either black or white, right or wrong, up or down. God is soooooo much above it. If you are a christian, you might be aware of the existance of a book in the bible called "Genesis". Read it metaphorically, not literally. It is the easier way to understand that both creationists and evolutionists are correct and wrong at the same time.

Right.

Could you, in your own words, describe the evolution theory that is settled in your mind Nachos?

Thx.

Pls show us where, how and why evolution 'started' according to your scientific mind and point of view.

Why would you want it in my words? I am not a scientist. Theory of evolution is complex, simplifying does not do it justice. That is how misunderstandings start. Just read all of this:

[link to evolution.berkeley.edu]

I think everybody on this planet can understand the evolution theory. Believing it to be true and accepting it as fact is the issue at hand.

Your theory is based on naturalism and simply states: whatever survives and reproduces leads to evermore complexity and novelty.

The very fact you and many other evotards, dismiss abiogenesis as a basis for evolution to actually happen, is highly laughable. It really boggles my mind how sane your mind is to be that gullible.

Yes, if they actually take time to learn it. You cannot truly understand the theory without learning it properly. If they don't, they will just ask "if evolution is real why are there still apes?"

No its not. That is just how it panned out. Evolution has nothing to do with getting more complex. If adapting to their environment leads them to getting more complex, that is just a side effect.

Evolution itself has nothing to do with how life started. Evolution is how life changes over time.

Last Edited by Kakarot_ on 02/08/2016 02:19 AM

Oh well you bibletards better look at this and see how God worked his magic .




[link to www.liveleak.com]

Evolution? Explain the sloth. A slow, ugly, dimwitted animal who literally 'hang out' in trees. They should have died out years ago from being not fast enough or not smart enough; instead, here they still are.

some animals have hardly "evolved" at all through millennium: like sharks, alligators...

something, someone designed us and other flora and fauna on planet earth; and continue to do so, in my opinion.

Macro Evolution =/= Micro Evolution

i get you brother-the only thing dumber than Evolution are the 'Creationist' THEORIES

Mental mud wrestling, lol.

There is no macro or micro evolution. There is only evolution ( by means of natural selection ).

Some people claim, "Our human race evolved from apes." In fact, let me tell you that man did not evolve from apes at all. Darwin proposed a theory, which says, "Man has evolved from apes."

When he made public this theory at that time, he brought it out with great trepidation. His theory is full of loopholes and is incomplete, and yet, it has been accepted by people to this day. Please think about it. The evolutionary process that he proposed of apes evolving to man, a process of tens of millions of years, cannot be found.

There isn’t one. Why weren’t there such people between apes and human beings? Not just human beings, but other things as well. None of the evolved animals that he referred to had the transitional process.

In addition, why are the species that exist on the continent of Australia different from the species that exist on other continents? He could explain none of these. Nevertheless this theory of evolution with all its loopholes has been accepted by human beings. This is indeed strange!

In fact, man did not evolve from apes at all in our view, only that there are different species existing in each time period. The continental plates on the earth planet inhabited by mankind are shifting and changing.

Geologists call the continents of Asia, Europe, America, North America, and South America the continental plates. The continental plates changed from time to time, and the civilizations on them would sink to the bottom of the waters.

Then, another continent would perhaps surface in another ocean, and such changes are continually taking place. Now, people have also discovered huge ancient buildings and the existence of past civilizations under the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean, as well as many other oceans.

However, upon examination, they are all found to be things that existed several hundred thousand years or several million years ago, or even earlier than that. At least, our present mankind knows that the continental plates have not changed in the past several hundred thousand years. When did they sink to the bottom of the waters then?

They definitely sunk very early, several hundred thousand years ago or even earlier than that. Therefore, when different continental plates changed, the species on them were also different. They did not come from evolution. There were similarities, but they were not of the same species. Absolutely not!

erm, really? Been a while since I studied evolution, but I remember giraffes being one of the most compelling arguments to support evolution. They've got fossils of extinct, shot necked giraffes and have discovered different species 'grew' in different ways and that the 'long necked' ones with their advantage of being able to reach foo that other animals can not mean they are the only species that survived.

I'm not discounting the idea of a creator, the two theories don't have to be mutually exclusive, but only a complete idiot would discount some level of evolution too. We are seeing it right now in our own species! We are getting taller! What is that if not some form of evolution?

You are an American using a VPN, aren't you?

Lamarckism has been banned out of textbooks and is considered horeshit.

Give a link or book that states the fossil record has excellent transitional fossils for giraffes. Don't make shit up please.