Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,927 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 904,673
Pageviews Today: 1,741,096Threads Today: 654Posts Today: 13,405
09:29 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WEST BANK SETTLEMENTS OFTEN USE PRIVATE PALESTINIAN LAND, STUDY SAYS

 
ConsPiraLicious
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 160882
Australia
11/21/2006 11:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
WEST BANK SETTLEMENTS OFTEN USE PRIVATE PALESTINIAN LAND, STUDY SAYS
JERUSALEM, Nov. 21 -- An Israeli advocacy group has found that 39 percent of the land used by Jewish settlements in the West Bank is private Palestinian property, which the organization contends is a violation of international and Israeli law guaranteeing property rights in the occupied territories.

In a report released here Tuesday, the Settlement Watch project of Peace Now also disclosed that much of the land that Israeli officials have said would remain part of the Jewish state under any final peace agreement is private Palestinian property.
That includes some of the large settlement blocs inside the barrier that Israel is building to separate Israelis from the Palestinian population in the West Bank. The report states that 86 percent of Maale Adumim on Jerusalem's eastern edge sits on private Palestinian land. A little more than 35 percent of the settlement of Ariel, which cuts deep into the northern West Bank, is also on private property.

Peace Now is an advocacy group that supports the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel and contends that Jewish settlements in the West Bank, where roughly 250,000 Israelis live, represent a major obstacle to achieving one.

Israel's government has long maintained that the settlements, developed in large part with public money, sit on untitled property known as "state land" or on property of unclear legal status. Israeli courts have ruled that unauthorized outposts erected on private Palestinian property must be razed, although those orders are rarely carried out.

The 38-page report offers what appears to be a comprehensive argument against the Israeli government's contention that it avoids building on private land, drawing on the state's own data to make the case. Israeli officials said Tuesday they are studying the findings.

The report's authors, Dror Etkes and Hagit Ofran, note that "it is difficult to assess all of the political and legal implications" of their findings. But "it is clear," they write, "that the settlement enterprise has, since its inception, ignored Israeli law and undermined not only the collective property rights of the Palestinians as a people, but also the private property rights of individual Palestinian landowners." The report states that the settlements occupy a total of 15,271 acres of private Palestinian land.

The report draws on maps and data from the Civil Administration, the military authority Israel established to govern the West Bank following the 1967 Middle East war. Its findings were reported first in Tuesday's New York Times.

The database was also used by a state commission, headed by Talia Sasson, a lawyer, that issued a critical report last year on the expansion of unauthorized Jewish outposts in the West Bank. Peace Now officials said they were leaked the information after Israeli courts delayed a hearing on their petition for the data earlier this year.

The Israeli government did not annex the West Bank after the 1967 war -- keeping the Palestinian population there from voting in the Jewish state -- and soon began sponsoring settlement construction in the territories. International law has been widely interpreted to prohibit civilian settlement or construction on land occupied during war.



[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 10/08/2011 09:03 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160929
United Kingdom
11/22/2006 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WEST BANK SETTLEMENTS OFTEN USE PRIVATE PALESTINIAN LAND, STUDY SAYS
I donít think the Bionic Hornet will deactivate itself on moral grounds if it feels its target is only rightfully defending its home. book





GLP