Would you rather have a president with a foul mouth and sweet policies or a president with a sweet mouth and foul policies?

Pols talk sweet and give you crap. You can almost hear the motor in the background behind their canned words. They can't wait to get elected so they can stab you in the back while they kiss their donors' asses.

Then along comes a man who says what he thinks. Sometimes his words are coarse, but there is no "whir" sound in the background. All you hear is straight up talk that usually makes a lot of sense because what he says is so obviously true.

Sometimes what he says makes perfect sense and other times you might say to yourself, "I don't agree with that." But the whole time, you know he's not bullshitting you.

He's not going to go back on his word and do the lobbyists' and donors' bidding like all the "sweet talking, foul acting" politicians are going to do.

This election is a test of your character. If you like being lied to, you'll vote one way. That's because you'd rather hear nice words than you like to hear the truth.

If on the other hand, you are willing to face reality, you'll vote for the man who has faced reality for five decades and made more good decisions than bad ones. And now he's willing to set that aside for the good of the country.

He might not have total control of his ego, but for the most part he does what is right rather than what TPTB hiding behind the curtain tell him to do.

He wants to save this country from tens of millions of illegals who will end up voting illegally, thereby destroying this country forever.

He wants to boot out the Syrian invaders to keep ISIS out of your neighborhood.

He wants to lower taxes for everybody to put more money in your pocket and to produce more jobs.

He has a loose tongue. Sometimes he says the wrong thing. But more often than not he does the right thing.

So which is it? Do you want sweet words and a fouled America or foul words and a sweet America?

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 02/20/2016 12:04 PM