2002 NASA: Satellites Reveal Mystery of Large Change in Earth's Gravity Field -NatGeo: "Something massive is moving on/within Earth"

Why is Earth's Girth Bulging?

August 7, 2002

This is heavy.

Something massive is moving on or within the Earth and causing the planet's gravity field to get wider around the equator and flatter at the poles, according to a pair of scientists studying the field with sensitive satellite instruments.

"Starting after 1997, the world that was getting rounder started getting more oblate [flattened at the poles]," said Christopher Cox, a research scientist at the Space Geodesy Branch of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

"It has finally gotten so big that we can't explain it with any known mechanism," said Cox, who co-authored a paper in the August 2 issue of the journal Science on this change in shape of the Earth's gravity field.

[link to news.nationalgeographic.com]

Some think this is from Earth expanding.

I don't know what's causing Earth's bulge to grow, and according to scientists, they are not so certain themselves.

But for those who may not know what the expanding Earth theory is, someone sent me this video.

To summarize, expanding Earth theory is sort of like this.

Imagine Earth was originally a completed puzzle with all the continents forming a shell sphere. A completed sphere, no oceans, just land-locked bodies of water. The atmosphere was rich.

Think of an orange skin, to use an orange again.

According to this theory, the orange skin splits apart, making continents throughout their separation.

And this is still going on today.

Would that cause the bulge to grow as indicated by NASA?

I don't know. What do you think? Here's the video on expanding Earth:



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I can explain it, but it will take a bit of time to set the stage for understanding the why's and how's.


Earth has a linear magnetic field, a rotating inertia field and a spherical electric field.

Though, these fields are hardly perfectly formed. The rotating inertia field is shaped like the jet stream, coiling around.

The linear magnetic field isn't linear, yet the field interacts as such.

And the Spherical Field form is not perfectly spherical. The spherical form has more flux in the equator region and less flux at the poles.

This is due to the linear magnetic field having its max flux at the poles and the least at the equator region. The rotating inertia field adjusts to each, making it coil like a snake.


Now comes the interesting part......

Earth is one of 6 rendition types. Each type rests in the field of the prior. As in, stars reside in the galaxy spherical flux. Planets reside in the Stars spherical flux, atoms reside in a planets spherical flux, photons reside in an atoms spherical flux and electrons exist in a photons spherical flux.

Now, try to follow....

Name - Linear type, Rotating type, Spherical type
Galaxy.....Electric(+)..Magnetic(-)..Inertia(-)
Star.......Inertia(+)...Electric(-)..Magnetic(+)
Planet.....Magnetic(-)..Inertia(-)...Electric(+)
Atom.......Electric(-)..Magnetic(+)..Inertia(+)
Photon.....Inertia(-)...Electric(+)..Magnetic(-)
Electron...Magnetic(+)..Inertia(+)...Electric(-)

Now, if Earths equatorial bulge is increasing, it can be from some of these but not all.

There is a law of energy transfer between flux types.

If we compress electric flux, we get a magnetic reaction. The magnetic flux will attempt to compensate for the tension in the electric field. Which is electromagnet, or magnetic flux generated from compressed electric.

Now, if we compress magnetic, we get inertia to resolve the tension. If we place magnets near each other, they resolve the tension via movement, inertia.

Now, if we compress the inertia field, we get electric response.

Decompression is the opposite. If we decompress a magnetic field, we get an electric response. If we decompress an electric field, we get an inertial response. If we decompress inertia, we get a magnetic response.

I call it MEA and EMA. M=Magnetic, E=ELectric, A=Atomic
I use atomic in a different form from standard science explanation.

Compression events E > M > A
Decompression events M > E > A

( > ) denotes the positive influencial path. COmpression of the following field. Decompression occurs equally to the opposite.

So if we decompress a magnetic field, electric field will compress and inertia field will decompress.

If we compress inertia field (acceleration) we get electric compression and magnetic decompression.

Now we can look at what is causing this in Earth. We have an electric field (the spherical flux) bulging. Electric flux is decreasing. Because we see a drop in the magnetic field, we have magnetic decompression event. This causes an electric response to adjust the tension.

More electric charge potential makes Earth want to jump out. As the core is (-) and the furthest limit in space is (+) at the ionosphere.

OR

The planets inertia in space is increasing. But we do not see this.


What powers Earths magnetic field? The Star (Suns) spherical magnetic flux. If that is decreasing, the Star must be experiencing an Inertia compression or an electric decompression.

So the Sun is either moving through space faster being near the galactic equator, or the Suns rotating field is weakening.

We do not see the Sun moving faster, but we can experience a slower solar output from charged particles. Meaning, the rotating electric field around the SUn is weakening.

Meaning the Galaxy we live in is either experiencing magnetic compression or inertia decompression. Is our galaxy slowing down or is it experiencing magnetic compression?


You might need to read it a few times to get it. To understand this theory, it takes a little bit.

btw, this theory of mine can explain other unexplainable concepts. Like the homopolar motor/generator. It also explains the northern lights and the van allen belts.

The northern lights are caused by snapping of magnetic and electric flux where the two meet in balance. Due to this balance, the flux interacts back and forth. Magnetic and Electric flux makes electromagnetic radiations, light.

The Van Allen belts are caused by the Electric and Inertia fields interacting. Electric charges in motion. Electric + inertia.


As well, electrons do NOT orbit around the atom. The electron orbits the photon, the photon orbits the Atomic center.

Last Edited by -Adam- on 02/26/2016 08:58 AM

That isn't new. The earth has ALLWAYS bulged at the equater and flattened at the poles due to rate of spin and mass and fact that the earth isn't SOLID but has a. viscous core as well as deep breaks in its crust.. We are not a perfectly round hard ball, we are an oval sponge.

The poles are melting, and through centrifugal force all the water naturally flows towards the center. It's that simple.

Centrifugal force/farce?

Wow! Just wow!

I will have to read it again, but I wanted to ask after the first go through, if this is affecting atoms, what does this do to atomic time calibrations?

Also, I thought the sun was very active as of late, past years? Do you mean other than Coronal Mass Ejections (CME), solar flares, geomagnetic storms etc, that seem to show activity?

Or do you mean sun spots?

Thanks so much. Will ask more as I reread it.

Water is freaking heavy at 8lbs/gallon, so if it's migrating to the equator, it stands to reason it would increase pressure outward as we spin around and around....weeeeeeee!

It is increasing, unexplainably.

The 3 field flux theory WILL open up all forms of energy for us to use.

It shows us how to make monopoles.

FIrst, what is a monopole? A single charge of magnetic influence?

Earth looks like a monopole of electric potential to the Sun. Because the (+) ionosphere surrounds the (-) core.

If we can make a spherical magnetic rendition via machinery, we can have a monopole field to work with. Even though it is not a TRUE monopole by definition, it acts like one due to the one side of flux forced into the core.

This is why Earth rotates the Sun and doesn't fall in. The Planet has a monopole appearance of a (+) electric type. Which means we orbit the Suns rotating electric flux. We are following the rotating flux of the Sun.

If the planets electric field was flipped, the planet would orbit the other way.

The moon is an atomic rendition, not a planet rendition. Which means it has a linear electric flux. This linear electric flux will force the Moon to face Earth.

Other Moons can be of the planetary type, stuck on the rotating inertia field of the Planet.

It also explains rings around planets, primary radiation/secondary radiation of Tesla, and other scientific unknowns.


This is all going to break out soon.

Mankind will travel the stars SOON, trust this.

Last Edited by -Adam- on 02/26/2016 09:05 AM

Like I said, centrifugal farce

Detection of a large-scale mass redistribution in the terrestrial system since 1998

Cox, Christopher M; Chao, Benjamin F. Science297.5582 (Aug 2, 2002): 831-3.

"The present increase, whose geophysical cause(s) are uncertain, thus signifies a large change in global mass distribution…"

[link to crawl.prod.proquest.com.s3.amazonaws.com]

Well, unexplainable as of a few minutes ago....lol


You will get it, this flux theory locks EVERYTHING together. It is a true grand unifying theory that explains the entire universe in working order. No faults found so far, everything lines up.

I welcome you to attempt to disprove, as that will allow me to prove this further.

Yay!

V posted. Can't read now because work but I'll be back to read your explanation later.

Thank OP for the thread and a big thank you to Voltaic for taking the time to explain his understanding. Also, thank you GLP for giving us a form to share our ideas on.

You give a great explanation!

As for "it is increasing, unexplainably", in the areas of research documents I have provided.

Wow, great info TilDeath, love it! I wonder if these changes since 1998 are anything to do with NASA using their gravitational engine?

 

I had read something about monopoles a bit ago. To be honest, it was a bit confusing, it was written in such tech-terms I thought I needed the Rosetta Stone to decipher it.

It had to do with water, and if an atom of water flips, it becomes a different kind of water which is rare.

Is water the first indication of monopole flipping, sort of like water being the beacon of change?

The human body is mostly water too.

considering there is zero proof that 'gravity' is real in the first place, your theory is speculative bunk

Thank you OP, Fantastic stuff, I love it, truly amazing and in my favourites now.

Matter is linked by the three fields as well.

Solids are full on links by all three flux types.
Liquids loose the inertia flux link. Ever notice how water makes a crystal when freezing? Inertia flux lining up and linking with the water from 6 sides. 3 sided compression patterns.

Gases loose both inertia and electric links. ELectric is the "gravity" we experience. SInce gases loose the electric flux links, it easily escapes Earths electric flux. Yet, the magnetic links still allows the Suns magnetic ejections (spherical field) to capture gases and pull them from Earth via the solar winds.

Solids only appear solid, as they orbit the Planet rendition equally in strength and speed. A solid in space would boil off rapidly.

Plasmas are just electric flux concentrated or atoms striped of photons and thus electrons.

Think how the field break.

Whena solid breaks, the inertia field gives way and that makes a sound, as it causes inertia in the air around it.

When liquids break, they loose electric flux and that doesn't make a break noise, it causes electric charges to shift.


If Water was M(+), E(-) with a loose inertia flux free.....


Now, how do things "melt"? By heat. And heat is electric flux. If we see fire, electric flux is being released and the object is lighter as it wants to go higher where the electric flux density matches the object.

Cooling objects in injecting electric flux. Compressing electric flux causes inertia decompression, allowing the inertia inks to lock together. Freezing the object. But the atoms do not bond to each other, they simply ALL obey the same inertia field around Earth.

This is why a gyro will not respond to Earths rotation alone. It must move against the inertia flux to show action of placement around the planet.

Gyros will fail when not near a source of inertia to orientate too.

as well, since a gas has magnetic links but no electric links, it isn't pulled down BUT it is still kept around Earth by the Magnetic field. SInce gases still have magnetic flux links to each other atoms.

I find all this interesting. I'm not here to prove or disprove, simply to explore, ask questions, wonder.

So any and all information or theories or brainstorming is why I come here!

I only pull research docs to open the door to discussions, not to prove or disprove, but to question questions!

I found this paper about magnetic monopoles and "properties of matter", "the first time fractionalisation in three dimensions is observed":

In this work the researchers, for the first time, attest that monopoles exist as emergent states of matter, i.e. they emerge from special arrangements of dipoles and are completely different from the constituents of the material. However, alongside this fundamental knowledge, Jonathan Morris explains the further meaning of the results:

"We are writing about new, fundamental properties of matter. These properties are generally valid for materials with the same topology, that is for magnetic moments on the pyrochlore lattice. For the development of new technologies this can have big implications. Above all it signifies the first time fractionalisation in three dimensions is observed."

[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]

It also explains chemistry.....

Acids and Bases.

Imagine an atom that is

Atom A, L+ I- M+
Atom B, L- I+ M-

Both atoms would react strongly to each other. Lots of energy would be released.

But if Atom A was met with another Atom A, nothing would happen.

We can have other milder reactions.

Atom A L+ I- M+
Atom C L+ I- M-

Now we only have magnetic reactions. This would cause a more mild reaction, but still a reaction. Though, the energy released would only be of the magnetic type, then influencing the other two accordingly, weakened.

I offered to disprove with good intent. I hope I didn't express any insult or negative feelings towards you.

I enjoy the debate, because when we do this offline in my lab, we make great progress.

Interesting.

They mentioned this in regard to monopoles:

The signature of a gas made up by these monopoles has also been observed in heat capacity measured by Bastian Klemke (HZB). Providing further confirmation of the existence of monopoles and showing that they interact in the same way as electric charges.

[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]

Now to be honest, I have to try to tie this together.

How would all this affect the perception or the reality of Earth's equatorial bulge growing, the gravity field changes, and the theory that "something massive is moving on or within the Earth"?

Could the confirmed gravitational waves, which they say are as fast as the speed of light, and are not electromagnetic, be an indication that the space/time blanket is getting a good shaking out?

What are the gravitational waves then in relation to what you explain?

Thanks!

Some clarity

A spherical inertia moment is pressure or vacuum.
Rotating and linear inertia is self explanatory.

Atoms spherical inertia field prevents other spherical inertia fields of the same polarity to penetrate each other. Simulating what we see as mass.

If mass of opposite spherical inertia polarities meet, they bond together to form a new, heavier atom. Bit some electric and magnetic flux must be released to make a new balance of the three flux.

To flip a specific field, like flipping the magnetic field, we need to influence the electric and inertia fields.

Like how generators flip the electric charge by magnetic/inertia interactions as the copper conductor passes the magnet.


We have 9 forms of energy we can utilize.

Electric, inertia and magnetic. All three can be either linear, rotating or spherical.

THis is Teslas 3-6-9 mytery.

3 types of flux, 6 renditions the interact with each other, 9 forms of energy expressed.

Last Edited by -Adam- on 02/26/2016 09:42 AM

I am not trying to disprove or prove. Just wondering and wanting to sift through ideas and try to explore them.

Let's say I don't have a thick skin because I have no skin (no ego here)--It's not about any "thing", it's about ethereal thought exchanges with anyone who wants to participate.

Gravity waves are electric flux waves.

We get electricity from magnetic/inertia interactions. SO in a way, we know very little about electric flux. We are using magnetic flux to produce electric charges. We, as humans, are using magnetic manipulations to make electric linear charges.

Can anyone explain what a rotating electric field is yet? A magnet moving past copper makes rotating electric charges, eddie currents.

Gravity waves are spherical electric charges propagating outwards. Perpendicular to light.

Light is linear to inertia, gravity is linear to electric. So time may be linear to magnetic?

A gravity wave may be linear magnetic, with inertia and electric oscillating against each other.

Just like light is linear to inertia and has electric/magnetic oscillations.

Then gravity is electric linear and has magnetic/inertia oscillations.

I think anyways, this is a quick answer to the question. Let me think on this for a bit and I will come back with a better answer.




Here is another point I just remembered.....transformers hum. That hum is the inertia field reacting to the electric/magnetic compression/decompression events. Though, due to the transformers shape, 99.999% of the inertia flux is cancelled out. The slight imperfections in the coil allow for very small inertia forces to cause small motions. Making the transformer hum.

Last Edited by -Adam- on 02/26/2016 09:51 AM