Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,507 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 77,971
Pageviews Today: 126,216Threads Today: 53Posts Today: 769
01:12 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED

 
paladin
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 162254
United States
11/25/2006 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
PAULSON CONFLICT OF INTEREST OVER WANTA FUNDS
CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Tuesday 21 November 2006 23:27
PAULSON CAUGHT 'IN FLAGRANTE' CONSPIRING TO HOLD ON TO THE $4.5 TRILLION

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press the ARCHIVE Button on the Home Page for Wanta Crisis reports since June 2006.

Note to all ICR subscribers: Please read this and preceding postings for updates that are not included in the latest (double) issue [International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 and 4], which went to press in late October. The list of banks with accounts holding funds belonging to the Ambassador, was published in the posting dated 26th October 2006 entitled AUTHORITATIVE LIST OF THE WANTA BANKS. The earlier posting on the offer made by Ambassador Leo Wanta to the Austrian authorities remains accurate, valid and unaltered by subsequent developments. It is up to Vienna either to accept or to reject his offer of massive tax windfalls.


Ever since the formally agreed and signed-off Settlement for Ambassador Leo Wanta of $4.5 trillion, which he has made over to his Virginia-based corporation AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, was hijacked by the criminal gangs running the US Government in July 2006, Leo Wanta's associates and key investigators, operating deep within the financial system, have been able to monitor what has been happening to the funds, who is benefiting, and which institutions are associated with these serial fraudulent transactions. International Currency Review is now authorised to disclose details of the latest diversionary operation surrounding the Ambassador's funds.

$4.5 TRILLION WANTA FUNDS REMAIN TAGGED AT GOLDMAN SACHS
In the first place, it is important to bear in mind, when reading what follows, that the $4.5 trillion REMAINS located in the form of a CHIP that is tagged in the name of Ambassador Leo Wanta and his Virginia-based corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in a US Treasury account with Goldman Sachs. The US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson, was formerly the CEO of Goldman Sachs, which is deploying these funds for its own institutional and self-enrichment purposes.

Therefore, the convoluted operation described below has nothing to do with Wanta’s tagged funds, but reflects rather a diversionary and criminal conspiracy masterminded by none other than Henry M. Paulson himself, who has insisted on the telephone to several victims of his Department’s capriciously aberrant behaviour in recent weeks, that ‘I CONTROL THE SHOW, I DECIDE WHEN AND HOW TO RELEASE THE MONEY, IF I DECIDE TO PAY…’. [For outburst context, see below].

TREASURY AND CORRUPT BANKS CONSPIRE TO AVOID PAYMENT
In the light of intelligence developed by investigators working with Ambassador Wanta and his colleague, the Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., it has emerged that Paulson thinks he is in charge of decisions concerning the disposition inter alia of Wanta’s funds, and that their placement is entirely a matter for him alone, and for no-one else – not even the President of the United States, George W. Bush Jr., who has hitherto been blamed for this breakdown of financial discipline and overt criminal activity at the highest levels in Washington.

PAULSON EMERGES AS THE MASTER CRIMINALIST OPERATIVE
Contrary to earlier impressions, it has become clear that this man is a menace to the continued integrity of the US Government, and that power has corrupted him completely. The latest example of his dangerous brinkmanship is the complex diversionary financial ‘pass-the-parcel’ operation, described below, which was designed to enable both the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to claim that they have fulfilled their obligations towards (inter alia) Ambassador Wanta – whereas in reality, what has been mounted is the Grandfather of all US Government Financial Scams:

According to a Compliance Officer speaking with authority on what he knows from the US Treasury, the $4.5 trillion of Wanta’s funds were included within funds that were Treasury-directed from the US Treasury’s account with a large Wall Street institution, to the Federal Reserve, and thence to Bank of America, Los Angeles, CA, and thence again to Wachovia Bank, New York, from which disbursements were to be made (ostensibly) to various accounts – including the Securities Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, with Morgan Stanley in New York.

And according to the same ‘authoritative’ source, THE US TREASURY DEPARTMENT IS NOW FINISHED WITH THIS TRANSACTION. Any failure to deliver the funds is therefore now supposedly a banking problem, and nothing to do with the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. Clever, isn’t it? Because…

WACHOVIA BANK IS IMPLICATED IN THE LATEST DIVERSION
We are now authorised to state that the aforementioned US Treasury Direct was diverted/hijacked by the SENIOR COMPLIANCE OFFICER WITH WACHOVIA BANK, NEW YORK, A CERTAIN MR ROBERT ARMENTA (phonetic), WHO ALSO ‘JUST HAPPENS’ TO BE A SENIOR COMPLIANCE OFFICER WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK. This information has been verified by more than the usual two sources.

THE SAME COMPLIANCE OFFICER IS IMPLICATED IN THE MISSING $5.5 TRILLION OF OVER-THE-COUNTER CREDIT DERIVATIVE OBLIGATIONS (CDOs/CBO), alluded to in a Lipper HedgeWorld report from Basel, Switzerland, by Martin de Sa’Pinto, Senior Financial Correspondent, dated 17th November 2006, posted at 7.47 am on that day.

In that report, referring to the fact that notional amounts of all types of derivatives contracts jumped to $369.9 trillion in the first half of 2006, representing an increase of 24% on the previous half-year period, it was explained that ‘notional amounts in the interest rate segment (of aggregate derivatives contracts outstanding) are relatively huge compared to the actual risk involved. This is implied by the gross market values for this segment, which total around $5.5 trillion, or 2% of the notional values that are outstanding’. Translated into the vernacular, this means that $5.5 trillion has gone missing. This development is not to be confused with, and is quite separate from, the $4.275 trillion of US Treasury Securities and Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) reported in early November to be in default in three European money centers – a figure that is believed by now to be significantly larger.

THE TREASURY DIRECT FUNDS AND THE CBO FUNDS HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED VIA WACHOVIA TO HSBC (BIRMINGHAM, UNITED KINGDOM), DEUTSCHE BANK (BERLIN) AND STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (DUBAI), BY THE BUSH-PAULSON-BERNANKE CRIMINALIST OPERATIVES WHO ARE SEEKING EVERY MEANS OF HOLDING ON TO THE FUNDS AND OF PREVENTING FULFILMENT OF THE WANTA SETTLEMENT, BOTH FOR SELF-ENRICHMENT PURPOSES AND ALSO BECAUSE THEY FEAR THAT IF WANTA IS PAID, HE WILL ENSURE THAT ALL CONCERNED ARE INDICTED AND SLAMMED INTO JAIL.

In reality, a 75-year ‘gag’ order will come into effect the moment he is paid (which WILL happen), and these aberrations will remain reported – exclusively, it seems, by International Currency Review, as the controlled ‘mainstream media’ is blind and has no real clue – for future financial historians to dissect. At least, that was what the Ambassador originally had in mind, since he (correctly) believes that ‘vengeance is the Lord’s’. However, according to law enforcement, as these official criminal operatives have become ever more brazen, and have compounded their past financial crimes by perpetrating fresh scams on the shaky assumption that they can continue to play fast and loose with the funds of others, it is becoming less and less likely that they can escape the inevitable crackdown and backlash that will ensue as they continue to play Russian routlette on this scale.

WACHOVIA BANK AND ITS SENIOR COMPLIANCE OFFICER HAVE DISREGARDED THREE (3) FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTIVES AND ONE (1) FED ORDER TO EFFECT PAYMENT ON THE TREASURY DIRECT TRANSMITTALS FOR AMERITRUST GROUP, INC., IN FINAL SETTLEMENT OF THE $4.5 TRILLION.

Also deprived of their funds, which were to have been settled in tandem with the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion, are law firms represented by TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP and PARKER CHAPIN LLC.

It stands to reason that if you double-cross powerful legal firms, and deprive them of what is owed to them, you are running a level of risk which exceeds that entailed when you double-cross others. This is the measure of the perpetrators’ arrogance.

IF WACHOVIA HAS TO BE CLOSED, THE MELTDOWN WILL SPREAD
It should be pointed out that Wachovia Bank is one of the ‘owners’ of the privately-owned Federal Reserve System. Wachovia Bank was advised on Friday the 17th November and again on Monday 20th November 2006 that steps will be taken to have the bank closed down if the Ambassador’s funds are not paid into his Virginia-based corporation’s Securities Account with Morgan Stanley in New York, without further delay. This will precipitate the global financial meltdown that these criminal idiots are evidently doing their utmost to precipitate.

On 15th November 2006, Mr Paulson was confronted by parties we are not permitted to name, concerning his culpable non-performance in respect of various outstanding Treasury obligations, of which the Wanta Settlement is just one of a number – the largest being the Treasury’s $32 trillion contract with the Chinese of 20th June 2006.

PAULSON USURPS THE POWER OF THE PRESIDENT
In response this legitimate enquiry, this former CEO of Goldman Sachs responded in a threatening tone of voice with the following assertive statement:

‘I CONTROL THE SHOW, I DECIDE WHEN AND HOW TO RELEASE THE MONEY, IF I DECIDE TO PAY…’. This reminds us of the Luciferian remark of one of his underlings last September, who was telephone-recorded saying: ‘We’ll pay when we’re Goddam ready’.

By the above circuitous means, the Treasury thinks it has ‘washed its hands’ of the Wanta Settlement, by arranging for its co-conspiring financial institutions to divert the funds – which of course they are all handling illegally, laying themselves open to RICO litigation in the American courts – in such a way that no-one can be blamed for the Treasury’s non-performance. Unfortunately for Mr Paulson, this despicably crooked little diversionary scheme – designed to enable Goldman Sachs to keep the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion – is not about to work out as planned.

We are advised that those directly participating in this devious hijacking operation, or with knowledge of it, include President George W. Bush Jr. (who is in a position to order his colleagues to cease and desist from their fraudulent behaviour, even if Mr Paulson believes that HE is in sole overall charge), Vice-President Richard B. Cheney, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson himself, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Dr Ben Bernanke, and the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte.

CUNNING, CLUMSY PLOT TO GET TREASURY AND FED OFF THE HOOK
The diversionary plot was arranged in the usual two-faced, deceitful manner – with the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve issuing instructions that the perpetrators wrongly imagined will enable both of them, and their senior officers, to deny any wrongdoing – and involving complicit institutions both in the United States and abroad. All concerned are co-conspirators and accessories to the continuing facts of this official corruption. Apparently, because all this corruption is officially condoned, the participating institutions and their senior officers (at home and abroad) believe that they will be in the clear when the day of reckoning arrives. We don’t think so.

In fact, let us be clear about this: both the US and the foreign institutions that are illegally mishandling funds represented to be based upon those belonging to the Ambassador and other owners, are wide open to eventual RICO litigation in the US courts. And since powerful law firms have been double-crossed and are victims of these officially perpetrated and condoned scams, the likelihood of such outcomes is far from academic. For a list of the US laws that are being flouted by these official crooks, please see earlier website postings in this series, on www.worldreports.org.

And another point has to be stressed. Although the Wanta funds have been annexed by Goldman Sachs and remain tagged in favour of Ambassador Leo Wanta and his corporation, as described above, the US Treasury has falsely represented, as has the Federal Reserve – through the Treasury’s Directions and the Federal Reserve’s three Directives and one Order – that the instructions that both have given, concern inter alia, the disposition of the $4.5 trillion belonging to the Ambassador.

DIVERSIONARY FINANCING OPERATION ‘WILL NOT FLY’
If you still follow us, it will therefore NOT be possible for present or past officers of either the Treasury or the Fed to claim in court that these instructions did not concern the Ambassador’s funds (even though the actual funds remain annexed by Goldman Sachs). In other words, the duplicity of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve in this conspiracy will unravel, and neither will be able to claim that their responsibilities were fulfilled. To summarise: this reprobate attempt at obfuscation ‘will not fly’.

In a further twist to this diversionary obfuscation operation, Auditors appeared at the offices of Wachovia Bank, New York, at 8.30am, Eastern Standard Time, on Friday 17th November 2006, to audit the bank’s books. The bank’s doors remained closed on that day until 11.00 am, when Wachovia refused to honour the three Federal Reserve Directives and the Fed Order, claiming ‘lack of funds’.

IN VIETNAM, CHINESE DEMAND ACTION, AND PUTIN AGREES
On 18th November, at the APEC meetings held in Vietnam – when Presidents Bush and Putin, dressed up in Vietnamese gowns, appeared to be exceedingly awkward in each other’s company and barely on speaking terms (since Putin has been financially shafted by President Bush) – Vietnamese President Hu and President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin discussed ‘The Wanta Plan’ and the US Treasury’s corrupt non-performance in respect of it. [The parties, apart from Bush, would not then have known about the Treasury’s latest convoluted means of avoiding payment]. Also attending this meeting was the Chinese Finance Minister. He addressed himself directly to President G. W. Bush in the presence of President Putin, and said: ‘Get it done, or we will do it’. President Putin concurred. The Americans are terrified that the Communist Chinese will indeed meet the obligations that the US Treasury refuses (by devious means) to honour.

Among the reasons that the Chinese are insisting on implementation of the Wanta Settlement, is that they understand better than anyone in Washington, that if it does not take place, the dollar will collapse and their economy will be crucified. Since they are now the largest holders of real dollars cash in the world, they have informed the American authorities that they will meet the US Treasury’s obligations, if Mr Paulson is not prepared to do so – which would of course give the Chinese Communist Government unprecedented leverage over the United States, in perpetuity.

Due to the greed and arrogance of the official criminal operatives holding power in Washington, these realities have not, evidently, made a sufficient impression inside brains of the officials concerned, whose eyes are green – and blind to the geopolitical dangers they are courting.

CHINESE TRUST NO-ONE IN AMERICA BUT WANTA AND COTTRELL
The other reason the Chinese mean what they say is that Ambassador Leo Wanta, and his colleague, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., are the ONLY US financial experts that they trust. This trust is grounded in their experience of dealing with Leo Wanta many years ago, when he was meticulous in fulfilling his promises and meeting his financial obligations towards them. Both the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell are held in the highest regard in Beijing for this reason alone. Naturally, they do not share the political orientation of the Chinese Communists: but at this level of international finance, what matters is trust, which is a product of meeting one’s obligations. It should be recalled that basically the same people remain in power in Beijing as were there when Leo Wanta dealt with them honourably (as always) in years gone by.

The above statement has been approved by Ambassador Leo Wanta and by Michael C Cottrell M.S. The following brief further analysis addresses the duplicity built into Mr Paulson’s speech on 20th November 2006 before the Economic Club of New York. It contains clues as to the mentality of the gang leaders holding the highest positions in the US Government. In case this is not sufficiently understood, the Rest of the World (with the likely single exception of the crooks holding power in London) is beyond disgusted at the arrogance of the present bunch of US office-holders, and has concluded that nothing that any U.S. official says can ever be trusted.

DUPLICITOUS NEW YORK SPEECH BY THE TREASURY SECRETARY
Many observers of the global financial crisis that we have been reporting for months – which is hidden from the view of most people, given the flood of derivatives-based liquidity and the massive bonuses being paid out to traders and financiers in the City of London this Christmas – will have noticed something curious about the remarks delivered by Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, before the Economic Club of New York on 20th November 2006. The Financial Times, given its lack of understanding of what is going on behind the scenes, reported Paulson’s speech ‘straight’, on the basis of the Treasury’s pre-speech release.

Those in the know will have been uncomfortably aware that Mr Henry Paulson’s smooth rhetoric diverged from the deplorably reprobate behaviour over which he, as US Treasury Secretary, is presiding. There was a conspicuous mismatch between his lofty rhetoric, and what he has been up to behind the scenes.

VICTIMS OF TREASURY SCAMMING THREATENED BY PAULSON
For instance, deploying similarly offensive language to that used in September by one of his unfortunate underlings, Mr Paulson has told no less than THREE victims of his own Department’s high-handed behaviour that he will pay what they are owed, if he decides to, when he feels like it, and on his own conditions. The tone of his comments was threatening, unpleasant, and reminiscent of a threat from a Chicago gangster.

Why has Mr Paulson lost his cool? Because he, like all those who are misbehaving at the highest level in the United States these days, is on the defensive. Since June 2006, the US Treasury, with the White House and the Federal Reserve, has presided over the illegal deployment, for institutional and personal gain, of the $4.5 trillion which is tagged in a Treasury Account at Goldman Sachs and Company, New York, in the name of Ambassador Leo Wanta and his Virginia-based corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. No amount of illegal handling of these funds can hide or disguise the fact that they remain tagged and payable to the Ambassador and his Virginia-based corporation, not least since investigators and observers working with the Ambassador from deep inside the structures monitor every illegal movement of these funds.

‘PRINCIPLES-BASED’ SYSTEM FOR THE UNPRINCIPLED
Hank Paulson’s main theme in his New York speech was the desirability of what he called a ‘principles-based’ accounting system, as opposed to a rules-based one.

Excuse us? Principles? Since when did Mr Paulson’s Treasury exhibit any adherence to principles – such as fulfilling its undertakings?

Take the latest example of its lack of principles. On Friday, a senior US Treasury apparatchik informed Ambassador Wanta that the New York Securities House Account of his Virginia-based corporation would finally, at long last, be credited with the $4.5 trillion stolen from the Ambassador by the authorities last June. (Actually, the $4.5 trillion should be paid plus compound interest: but let us leave this point aside for a moment). Specifically, the official voice at the other end of the telephone stated that the relevant Securities Account would be credited by 2.30 am on Monday morning Eastern Standard Time, 20th November 2006.

As has been the case in the past, this latest verbal undertaking from the US Treasury proved to be completely worthless [see above]. Instead of being credited as instructed by the Treasury (so that the Treasury believes it is ‘covered’), the sequence of events described above ensued. Yet another round of overnight ‘pass-the parcel’ involving several large US and foreign institutions, was kicked off this week, so that the banks concerned can book huge overnight profits to improve their corroded balance sheets.

DECODING THE TREASURY SECRETARY’S UNPRINCIPLED RHETORIC
Yet on the self-same morning when the $4.5 trillion should have been credited to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc’s Securities Account with Morgan Stanley, the US Treasury Secretary had the gall to stand up before the Economic Club of New York, where he pontificated at great length about the virtues of a ‘principles-based’ accounting (and accountability) system, and how much more preferable such a system is to a ‘rules-based’ system.

Let us decode the Treasury Secretary’s duplicitous rhetoric for you:

• ‘Principles-based’ = a loose, vague environment in which verbal undertakings can be routinely reneged upon, false instruments and documents can be freely tendered, promises can always be broken, and in which undertakings are made of India-rubber: like those of the US Treasury.

If necessary, co-conspiring US and foreign financial institutions engaged in criminal operations can be roped in to ‘legitimise’ whatever scam is intended. In other words, a crooks’ charter.

• ‘Rules-based’ = a Capital Markets environment in which the Rule of Law prevails and in which breaches of trust and of undertakings result in appropriate lawsuits and RICO actions, triggering three times damages, plus the long-term imprisonment of the felons concerned, including official holders of high public positions either before or after they have left office.

Of course, given the US Treasury’s notorious behaviour under both Mr Paulson and his predecessor, John Snow, it stands to reason that a loverly-jubbly ‘principles-based’ Capital Markets environment, in which undertakings morph overnight and promises have no meaning, is just the kind of market environment that current holders of the highest offices and other corrupt officials, plus their complicit intermediaries and institutional accessories to the fact of criminalised behaviour, naturally prefer.

‘WRONGDOERS WILL SEEK WAYS TO CIRCUMVENT THE RULES’
Mr Paulson said at one point in his speech that that ‘Rules by themselves cannot eliminate fraud. Wrongdoers will seek out loopholes or ways to circumvent the rules’.

One wonders whom exactly he meant by ‘wrongdoers’ here. Although he referenced the ‘recent business scandals’, was he ALSO speaking from his own and his official colleagues’ perverted perspective, by any chance? After all, the US Treasury over which Mr Paulson presides, remains in breach not only of its formal undertakings towards Ambassador Wanta and other victims, but also of its contract dated 20th June 2006 involving the disposition of $32 trillion with the Communist Chinese – having failed to deliver, and having provided the Chinese with no more than a few paltry progress payments. This has understandably infuriated them. Other victims, apart from the Chinese authorities and Ambassador Wanta, have, as noted, also been double-crossed by Paulson’s Treasury.

So Paulson is no stranger to non-performance. He is himself adept at ‘seeking out loopholes or ways to circumvent the rules’.

Yet he boasted hypocritically in his speech of his 32 years’ experience in Capital Market business both in the United States and abroad. He has served as the Chairman of Goldman Sachs, and his Series 7 and Series 24 securities qualifications, required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), oblige him (even though he may have forgotten this) to comply 100% with SEC regulations at all times, and to meet his legal obligations likewise. Did he imagine that his audience would not be aware of his hypocrisy and double-talk in this context?

NEW YORK SPEECH A SMOKESCREEN TO MASK TREASURY SCAMMING
The entire New York speech appears to have been designed to throw a smokescreen over the latest fraudulent behaviour with which, as detailed above, Mr Paulson is directly associated. As we have reported, on Friday 17th November, auditors appeared at Wachovia Bank, which did not open its doors until 11.00 am. This bank is believed to be implicated in the outright misappropriation and theft of between $9.0 trillion and $11.00 trillion. The institution was warned on 17th November that the Ambassador’s account must be credited by 2.30 am on Monday 20th November as promised, or steps will be taken to have this institution – with which William Clinton, George H. W. Bush Sr. and John Negroponte, among other criminalist operatives, are involved – closed down.

This threat was repeated on Monday 20th November, after the promised Wanta Settlement payment was again illegally obfuscated.

Last week, the US Treasury Secretary suggested to powerful Chinese authorities that a tripartite arrangement should be implemented, involving the US Treasury, the Chinese authorities, and the Ambassador and his colleague, Michael C Cottrell, M.S., under which the Treasury would not need to remit the $4.5 trillion of the Ambassador’s tagged funds to Leo Wanta’s Virginia-based corporation, at all. That would have enabled Goldman Sachs to hold on to the actual $4.5 trillion indefinitely, which appears to be Mr Paulson’s objective. In other words, this was just another two-faced ploy to try to avoid fulfilment of the Wanta Settlement, so that Goldman Sachs could keep the funds for ever. Sorry, it isn’t going to work out.

SEEING THROUGH ANOTHER TREASURY PRETEXT NOT TO PAY
The Chinese authorities – who, like other extremely important foreign parties we cannot yet name, are furious that they have repeatedly been double-crossed by these duplicitous scoundrels in Washington – retorted, cleverly, that this proposition needed to be cleared with the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell. As reported above, both are held in the highest possible regard in Beijing, given not least that Leo Wanta is the only US financial expert they trust, based on his impeccable behaviour towards them many years ago. Naturally, neither the Ambassador nor Mr Cottrell would countenance such a prospectively fraudulent arrangement, and neither will the Chinese.

But this is the kind of set-up the Treasury Secretary invokes by a ‘principles-based’ Capital Market environment. Being interpreted, this means that he can change his ‘principles’ in accordance with whatever scam takes his fancy. It may have suited him hitherto that President George W. Bush Jr. has primarily been blamed for the crisis and bad publicity surrounding the hijacking of the Wanta funds, because such ‘finger-pointing’ has provided cover for the disgraceful corruption over which he is himself presiding – continuing the reprobate behaviour of his predecessor, John Snow.

U.S. TREASURY IS NOW AN EXTENSION OF GOLDMAN SACHS
With the arrival of Mr Paulson, the Treasury has effectively become an extension
of Goldman Sachs. Not only has Paulson installed Goldman Sachs-ites in Treasury positions, but he has wilfully ensured that the $4.5 trillion, tagged in the name of Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta and his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, has been annexed by Goldman Sachs so that it can be used for personal and institutional enrichment, while diversionary financing operations supposedly related to the delayed Wanta Settlement and its non-performance, are ‘run’ externally in order to obfuscate the central issue – namely, that GOLDMAN SACHS IS ILLEGALLY SITTING ON THE WANTA FUNDS UNDER THE SIGNATURE AND AUTHORITY OF THE U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY THE GOLDMAN SACHS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.

There has probably never been a more egregious conflict of interest in US, or world, financial history. No wonder Mr Paulson is pushing for ‘rules’ governing the Capital Markets in the United States to be loosened or even replaced by an environment which will be more conducive to saving him from being slammed in jail when he leaves office.

PAULSON’S CANT ABOUT A ‘PRINCIPLES-BASED’ SYSTEM
For in his New York speech, Mr Paulson subtly latched on to the concept that the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) accounting system, used in a number of foreign markets, ‘is different from ours’. He described IFRS as ‘principles-based’, which he then redefined as meaning that ‘the system is organized around a relatively small number of ideas or concepts that provide a framework for thinking about specific issues. The advantage of a principles-based system is that it is flexible and sensible in dealing with new or special situations’.

Just the kind of malleable, India-rubber Capital Markets environment, in fact, that enables those without any scruples or integrity to play fast and loose with the funds of others – such as the law firms represented by Troutman Sanders LLP and Parker Chapin LLC, the Chinese authorities, and Ambassador Leo Wanta.

Mr Paulson’s double-minded rhetoric at the Economic Club of New York fooled only those who were sitting on their brains. Everyone who is anyone in the international financial community and in key government circles worldwide, knows all about the gangsterism of the US authorities since the summer – when they hijacked the $4.5 trillion, tagged in the name of the Ambassador and his corporation, and started playing fast and loose with his funds, driven by unprincipled greed and unbounded arrogance.

Henry Paulson’s call for the US Capital Markets to dispense with the ‘rules-based’ environment – code for the Rule of Law – in favour of a ‘rules-free’ system, where ‘principles’ are the sole privilege of the unprincipled, will not have pleased those who have experience of the US authorities’ serial criminal behaviour these past six months.

SETTING THEMSELVES UP – FOR BEING SLAMMED INTO JAIL
The Ambassador, whose famous integrity stands in sharp contrast to those officials who are co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of the scams that the Treasury has been presiding over since June 2006, will not play the US authorities’ increasingly desperate games. With vast experience of global and official finance, the Ambassador knows that, as Mr Paulson reiterated last week, the $4.5 trillion will have to be duly credited to the Morgan Stanley Securities Account of his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. Every attempt by Mr Paulson and his co-conspirators to avoid payment of the Wanta Settlement funds, brings the United States closer to financial meltdown, the US dollar to collapse – and the official perpetrators of these endless financial scams closer than ever to winding up behind bars. In case this statement is deemed by ill-informed people to represent an empty threat, it should be understood that much of the intelligence published in this posting is derived from investigators working with Ambassador Leo Wanta, and from reliable and disgusted sources inside the financial structures. The fact is that the perpetrators have been caught IN FLAGRANTE.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS • AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.


[link to www.worldreports.org]
KIM JONG-IL

User ID: 162342
Norway
11/25/2006 06:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Are you sure you didn't make a mistake and say TRILLION instead of BILLION?


Nobody has $4.5 trillion unless its monopoly money.
United Korea Will Be The Center of the New World.

JUCHE!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 162348
United States
11/25/2006 06:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
I wanta trillion dollars!
KIM JONG-IL

User ID: 162342
Norway
11/25/2006 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
I wanta trillion dollars!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 162348



What for? You can have a free matrix existance with only a billion.
United Korea Will Be The Center of the New World.

JUCHE!
paladin  (OP)

User ID: 162254
United States
11/25/2006 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Who is Leo Wanta?
by J. Orlin Grabbe

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------


"Bill Clinton's Short-Term Notes"
Asian-European, the CIA, and Mochtar Riady

Meet Leo Emil Wanta. At one point Wanta had bank accounts at Metishe Bank in Moscow, Avenue Bank on the Champs-Elysee in Paris, Credito Italiano in Milan, Anker Bank in Geneva, Swiss Bank Corporation in Geneva, the Algemeine Spaar in Brussels, the Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank in Vienna, Creditanstalt Bankverein in Vienna, and--the perennial favorite of money launderers--Citibank in Milan, New York, and Los Angeles.
Meet Leo Emil Wanta, a man accused of, or praised for, crashing the Russian ruble over 1990-1. There is no doubt that he was a currency trader, placing orders for 100 billion rubles at a time. Then there is the matter of gold--Russian gold.

One of the orders faxed around the world from his New Republic/USA Financial Group Ltd. (2101 North Edgewood Avenue, Appleton, WI 54914, Tele/Fax: (414) 738-7007), dated Feb. 4, 1991, is an offer to buy/sell/effect 2000 metric tons of gold bullion, with rollovers under London good delivery. At the time of this offer, Wanta was in constant phone contact with Roberto Coppola in Rome, where Coppola served as Ambassador of the Russian Republic. Was it Russian gold Wanta was selling?

Was Wanta just another trader specializing in illiquid currencies and flight capital in the form of bullion? Was he a big time money launderer? Either would explain the 14 percent commissions at which he dealt. Or was neither the case? Let's look closer. Because something doesn't add up.

Wanta, an erstwhile travelling companion of Vernon Walters and supplier of machine guns to Bill Casey, was arrested by Swiss authorities on July 7, 1993, in Geneva, Switzerland. He was held for four months, then extradited to Wisconsin to stand trial for state taxes owed for the years 1982 and 1988. The grand total of taxes owed--$14,000.

Curious that. Extradited for $14,000? In taxes? From Switzerland? The story gets weirder.

Wanta was sentenced to 22 years in prison. (Better he had killed a few people than that he owed taxes.) Afterward, on Sept. 21, 1996, Wanta wrote a mysterious letter to Hillary Rodham Clinton, referring to "U.S. President Bill Clinton's Short Term Notes and IMF Sale of Bullion." In the letter Wanta referred to his own "de-stabilization of the Soviet Union Rubles (SUR)" and noted that he "prevented the Soviet & Italian Mafiosa from the Soviet Funds in favour of our U.S. Treasury & Metals Accounts in excess of US$ 150 billion".

Wanta then threatened: "Until by legal release from the un-consitutional/ false incarceration in Wisconsin--as a diplomat & non-resident--I am legally interested in the corporate placement of short-term notes & I.M.F. gold bullion/troy ounce delivery contract. Thank you for your kind assistance in this timely situation."

Wanta's letter (or letters) got results. On Jan. 10, 1997, Wanta received a reply from Erskine Bowles at the White House.


Mr. Leo E. Wanta
c/o Kettle Moraine
Correctional Institute
P.O. Box 31
Plymouth, WI 53073

Dear Mr. Wanta:

Thank you for your
letter. I appreciate
hearing from you.

To give your concerns the
proper attention, I have
forwarded your letter to
the Office of Agency
Liaison within the White
House. You can be certain
that your concerns will
be carefully reviewed.

Again, thank you for
writing.

Sincerely,

Erskine B. Bowles

On February 1, 1997, after Bowles had checked with W.H. Agency Relations, Leo Wanta was released on $90,000 bail.

So here's what we know about Wanta so far: Extradited from Switzerland on a triviality. Sentenced to 22 years on the same triviality. But then sprung after references to "Bill Clinton's short-term notes" and the White House checks with Agency Liaison.

Then there's the Russian currency/gold issue. Wanta was dealing in billions of dollars. Where did the financing come from? Another question comes to mind: How did Wanta get to be Ambassador from Somalia?

Claire Sterling's not-so-reliable book Thieves World contains a good bit of information (and mis-information) on Leo Wanta. (Sources include a mysterious Mr. X, an "investment banker", and an unnamed FBI agent. Sterling's credits, however, may identify the latter source: she gives special mention to "Jim Moody of the FBI"--the man who headed up the FBI's organized crime division.

Wanta himself identifies Sterling's "Mr. X" as Treasury Special Agent Philip Wainwright.

Depending on your point of view, Wanta is a con artist or a hero: bilking the crumbling Soviet empire of its currency and resources, helping pushing the wounded bear over the cliff. Wanta's operation has been called the Great Ruble Scam. That is, one of the few ruble scams not engineered by the Russian central bank/Russian government itself.

Wanta presented his credentials in Moscow in October 1990. He was a member of Reagan's "President's Club" (meaning he had given $50,000 to the campaign). He also headed the "New Republic Financial Group" located in Appleton, WI, and registered in Vienna, Austria (New Republic/USA Financial Group, GES.m.b.H., Kartnerstrasse 28/15, Telefon: 513-4235, A-1010 Wien). New Republic had declared capital of about $17,000, according to Sterling. On this basis, Wanta wanted to swap $5 billion for 140 billion rubles, rising over five years to $50 billion for 300 billion rubles.

You never make money unless you think big, right? The proposal (one of three similar ones from seemingly disparate sources) was to be a mini-Marshall plan to import into Russia consumer goods like frozen chickens and Tampax. Or that was the story. Boris Yeltsin approved the deal, but it fell through, according to Sterling, when the State Department reported that Wanta "had major debts and some credit card problems". (Wanta denies that the State Department ever issued such a statement. Much of Sterling's information, in fact, seems to come from a Soviet investigator looking to smear Wanta as a common criminal.)

To Sterling's "Mr. X", who worked with Wanta, the objective was quite different: "I knew there would be a possibility of a Western privately orchestrated economic Jihad that could help crush the communist ruling powers by destroying their unstable ruble. Unilaterally and privately, I decided to play a catalytic role to crash the ruble."

During the previous year Wanta's group bought sold and traded rubles. Many of the orders/offers appear to be bogus--calculated to cause a run on the ruble.

And--coming forward to October 1990--Wanta's deal of $5 billion for 140 billion rubles, or 28 rubles to the dollar, would have been transacted at roughly double the value of the dollar relative to its black market rate which was closer to 14 rubles to the dollar. If executed, the plan would have effectively given Wanta a free 70 billion rubles with which to help himself to the natural resources of a crumbling empire. Not bad. Who was Wanta representing? Himself? Or the U.S. government?

Moving forward to Jan./Feb. 1991, we find Wanta in the process of moving two thousand tons of gold--during a time period when coincidentally two thousand tons of Soviet gold mysteriously disappeared from the Central Bank.

By December 1991 Wanta and his partner Kok Howe Kwong had set up a food for petroleum joint venture in Moscow. Accounts in dollars and rubles were opened at Status Credit Bank in Singapore by the two through Asian-Europa Development Pte Ltd. Asian-Europa proceeded to export Soviet petroleum and import Western goods at an exchange rate (oil for goods) very favorable to Asian-Europa. Asian-Europa appears to be a U.S. government/CIA proprietary company set up under USCA Title 18, Sec. 6., Line 11. And it appears to have had a relationship with Mochtar Riady's Lippo Group.

Without a doubt, Wanta dealt the fading Soviet apparatus a body slam or two. Does that make Leo Wanta an American hero? And if so, why was he incarcerated? Was it just to keep him off the streets because of what he knew (a standard maneuver in the intelligence community)? Does that explain Wanta's bogus extradition from Switzerland? Or was Wanta just a clever con artist who could somehow come up with the contacts and billions of dollars necessary to deceive a crumbling superpower, not to mention the CIA and the U.S. Treasury? Either way, Wanta ain't your average used-car salesman. Wanta may be a victim railroaded by the government he served.

Leo Wanta was appointed Ambassador of Somalia for Switzerland and Canada in March 1993. In July, Wanta had been in Switzerland to make $250,000,000 available for the Children's Defense Fund at the request of Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster. Children's Defense Fund? Whose idea was that? What was going on there?

Shortly after Wanta's arrest, and following his daughter's birthday on July 20, 1993, the Superintendent for the Swiss prison where Wanta was being held came by and told Wanta that Wanta's friend Foster had been murdered.

Wanta used to visit FBI Director William Sessions at his office through a secret entry known as the "back of stage". There he would nearly always meet with a Mr.Gonzalez and a Mr. Jim Moody, who were the FBI enforcers for RICO and organized crime issues. Moody was the head of the FBI's organized crime section.

Can any of this shed some light on the death of Vince Foster? Clearly Foster was engaged in some major financial dealings--including the $250,000,000 for the Children's Fund that Wanta discusses. Foster's financial dealings may not explain why he was killed. But they could very well explain why there was no investigation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7499
United States
11/25/2006 07:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
wanta "story" isn't news, it's pure disinfo
paladin  (OP)

User ID: 162254
United States
11/25/2006 07:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
wanta "story" isn't news, it's pure disinfo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7499




you might be right.......this story may not be ture..


I have read a rew threads about this.....Al Gore has talked about a large sum of money that can free the American people..

I posted this here because this is making the rounds again....it is the hot news on the gold pages

paladin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 148268
United States
11/25/2006 07:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Wachovia refused to honour the three Federal Reserve Directives and the Fed Order, claiming ‘lack of funds’.
 Quoting: paladin

A run on the banks in the making?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7499
United States
11/25/2006 07:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
wanta "story" isn't news, it's pure disinfo




you might be right.......this story may not be ture..


I have read a rew threads about this.....Al Gore has talked about a large sum of money that can free the American people..

I posted this here because this is making the rounds again....it is the hot news on the gold pages

paladin
 Quoting: paladin



Gore ? When ? Where ?
:)
User ID: 61633
United States
11/25/2006 08:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
[link to www.silverstrategies.com]
The Mogambo Guru

11/22/06
Richard Daughty
...the angriest guy in economics
The Mogambo Guru
The Daily Reckoning

-- These days I am paralyzed, consumed with dread at the unfolding economic drama, although I am somewhat mollified by the news that Total Fed Credit was down by a microscopic $400 million last week. So the Fed, I am somewhat relieved to note, is not going crazy with creating new excesses of money and credit with this particular method.

They did take the time to issue another $2.5 billion in actual cash, which seems weird, because when I go up to strangers and ask for money, they tell me they don't have any money. And then, when I get home, the family asks me for money, and I tell them the same thing! Like I said; weird!

And speaking of cash, which seems to be all anyone talks about around here anymore, Cash in Circulation is up $26 billion from this time a year ago, which is about $87 per man, woman and child in America, or about $350 for a family of four. You got yours? Me, neither.

And foreign central banks are still slopping around in the tons and tons of dollars that they end up with, as dollars are the principal export of the United States, to the tune of $850 billion a year in the trade deficit alone. And as these foreign central banks end up with the dollars until all the vaults and drawers and cabinets and closets are full of them, and they got rid of a few of them last week by putting another whopping $7.6 billion into their holdings of government and agency debt at the Fed, mostly because there isn't anything else to do with so damned much money, even though I generously offered to let them deposit the money with the First Mogambo Bank Of Earth (FMBOE), proudly serving this whole sector of the galaxy for almost three of your earth weeks, but they won't even return my calls.

But if you want to see something really, really eye-popping, then Savings/Other Deposits in the banks is the place to go, as they were up an astonishing $228 billion last week! In one week! This is huuuUUUuuuuge! A quarter of a trillion bucks appeared like magic in accounts at the banks! In one week! I guess this must be the arrival of the temporary Treasury accounts money that was recently authorized. But wow!

My breath comes in ragged gasps and my heart spasms involuntarily at the potential ramifications of the banks instantly having another huge $228 billion glob of deposits to tap into, to make new loans, enrich themselves, cause price inflation and increase indebtedness to finance a boom.

And I am positively woozy at the thought of this money multiplied by the almost-zero fractional reserve requirement of banks, as they now are required to hold less than one-percent of the total of bank deposits or marked-to-market assets as reserves against any new loans. Truly, I am aghast and terrified at this astonishing, astonishing, and (did I say "astonishing"?) astonishing amount of money flooding the banks.

When it gets like this, bad, bad things (BBT) are happening, and these acts of official desperation are merely symptoms, like when your stomach goes "bluruuUUUuuurp!" about twenty minutes after you eat that half a tuna (probably tuna) sandwich you found abandoned on top of the fax machine, so you figured it was probably still pretty fresh and safe to eat, and with prices being the way they are, I could, you know, save a few bucks with this "free" lunch.

But this is not about my unfortunate choice of luncheon entrees, but about this $228 billion that has appeared in the banks, which we suspect is the Federal Reserve frantically pulling every slimy trick in the book, and thus we know what we have to do! We run to gather up axes, pitchforks, scythes and flaming torches, preparatory to a march on Washington like the angry, unruly, irrational, drunken mob of blubbering halfwits that we are, shouting mindless revolutionary slogans and Striking A Blow For Liberty or something equally inflammatory. But we see with alarm that it is after 5:00 p.m.! Time's a-wastin'!

So you quickly call down to the hardware store and ask if they are open, and happily find that they are open for another hour yet! Anxiously inquiring about the equipment you need, you discover that not only do they not stock any scythes at all, but when you ask about the flaming torches, they laugh derisively and ask "What are you, crazy?", Naturally, I reply in typical Mogambo fashion, and I am screaming into the phone "You call yourself a hardware store, and yet I can't get simple flaming torch? And when I expose your blistering incompetence as a vendor of hardwares and gardening implements, you dare ask me if I am crazy?"

There was, of course, a lot more that I was going to say, but he was, besides being a total failure as a hardware professional, also extremely rude, and he said "Get lost, moron!" hung up!

So, now that I am sidetracked, consumed by plotting my revenge against a local hardware store, I have kind of lost interest in the angry mob marching on Washington thing. But I'm still astonished at it! And plenty angry and scared, too!

So I am with you in spirit as you march along! And good luck with that, you know, flaming torches thing. I'll speak to my hardware guy about it very soon.

-- The bad news is that, thanks to the last election, half the states in the USA now have legally-mandated higher minimum wages, most of them usually about 40% higher than the federal minimum wage of $5.15.

This is unalloyed bad news. If you don't believe me, then listen to Gerard Jackson, the Economic Editor of Brookes News, who cited economists Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway of the Employment Policies Institute, who found that there "was a correlation between minimum wage increases and poverty among 'the poorest of the poor.' In short, [effective] minimum wage increases raised the level of poverty. This is precisely what economics predicts."

And it is exactly what we will get more of, regardless of the glut of "economists", including some laughably lame-brained Nobel Prize crackpots, who have secured their place in the Mogambo Big Book Of Economic Infamy (MBBOEI) when they advocated, in writing, another raise in the minimum wage.

It boggles the mind that they would advocate such a thing when all of the other dozen or so raises in the minimum wage for the last 50 years have done absolutely nothing good for anybody, and have only left us with predictably more tragically poor people, a bigger government to take care of them, and higher prices for everybody, necessitating subsequent hikes in the minimum wage, raising prices, and continuing the spiral down, down, down to the Stygian depths of stinking economic hell and utter ruination.

And note that not one of these lowlife "economists" recommended that the damnable Federal Reserve stop creating excess money and credit, which is the cause of the price inflation that is bedeviling the low-wage worker in the first place! Idiots! First-class idiots!

Perhaps it is not for nothing that MoneyWeek.com brought up the fabled wage-price spiral, which is the unfortunate effect that when prices go up, it makes people demand higher wages, which makes prices go up, making people demand higher wages, which makes prices go up, which makes people demand higher wages, which makes prices go up, and it goes around and around and around, prices worsening and worsening and raising the levels of poverty and misery.

But if you really want an insight into some of the people responsible for this economic insanity that is plaguing the USA, and now the world, look no further than an op-ed piece in the 11/21 Wall Street Journal titled "The Economic Front". It is by Roger Altman who was "deputy secretary of the Treasury in the first Clinton Administration," and Alan Blinder, "a professor of economics at Princeton and former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board."

These banking "corporate insiders" are now waxing concerned that the rich are getting richer, and the middle class and the actual poor are getting poorer, which is what you expect from the sick, twisted economic system that has evolved in this country over the last 50 years.

But despite the apparent credentials of these two guys, heavyweights as they are in the economics biz, it is a load of crap from one end to the other, but the jewel is contained in the paragraph that starts off "What to do?" They start right in with an astounding admission and a lie when they go write "The problem is both deep-seated and longstanding, and there is no magic bullet to set things right"! Hahaha!

These two guys were, themselves, powerful deep-seated forces longstanding, who never raised a peep about anything the whole time, but were instead participants and raving cheerleaders of the whole sorry monetary mess of excesses the whole time! Now they are admitting that they failed, and their idiotic economic theory failed, and now all these serious economic results of their incompetence need fixing? Astonishing!

And their lie is that, despite their denial, there actually IS a "magic bullet to set things right!" I note that all the problems are caused by inflation in prices, and which all come from inflation in the money supply! So all you have to do, magic bullet-wise, is control the number of dollars in the economy (like as happens when the dollar was gold, as required by the Constitution for that very reason), and then keep the banks from acting stupid by greedily creating excessive amounts of money and credit to finance the damned booms, which always bust, and in their wakes always leave the aforementioned misery and suffering and mal-distribution of wealth and income.

Then, without an expandable money supply, the next time the government decides to spend a lot of money without raising taxes, but instead by borrowing all the money, they will have to literally borrow all the money in existence! Hahaha! Then, the economy suffers, the politicians who voted for that kind of profligate idiocy get voted out of office, intelligent people are elected on Congress, and things naturally are "set aright!"

It's all that simple! It's just that freaking simple! It's a magic bullet!

Well, despite their admitted dismal failure, Messrs. Altman and Blinder now have their own plan to set things aright! They go on to say that more socialism, communism and fascism will fix things, and that involves raising the federal minimum wage, increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit (a negative income tax, as the low-wage worker gets a tax refund in excess of all the taxes he paid!), "moving toward" universal health insurance (with all children immediately covered), moderating government spending and raising taxes, having someone pay for more education and training for America's workers so that they can, somehow, compete with foreign workers and yet make more money than they do, again getting the federal budget under control (which, they repeat, involves less spending and higher taxes), forced conservation measures to limit energy usage, and more research (paid for, I assume, by the federal government spending the money, either in grants or tax incentives) for developing energy alternatives. Hahahaha!

I can't believe my eyes that I am reading this stuff! And not once- not once! -did they mention the Federal Reserve's role in all of this: Causing the inflation which has caused all the problems!

-- Inflation will be what will destroy us, but not quite yet, as we gather from Bloomberg.com, in a essay titled "U.S. Economy: Consumer Prices Decline, Reassuring Fed (Update3)"! They report that "The consumer price index dropped 0.5 percent, matching September's retreat, the Labor Department said today in Washington. Excluding food and energy, prices rose 0.1 percent, the smallest increase in eight months."

They go on to say that the news is still not good, in that "On a year-over-year basis, consumer prices were up 1.3 percent, compared with 2.1 percent during the 12 months ended in September." While this is not as horrendous as it is going to get, 1.3% inflation is still too high, as inflation of anything above zero inflation is too high.

It gets much more interesting when they go on to say "The smaller increase reflects a decline in energy prices from a year earlier, when they soared after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupted production on the U.S. Gulf Coast." Whoa! Let me get this straight; inflation was up, but it would have been dramatically higher if the price of energy wasn't down from a big spike last year thanks to a killer hurricane that impacted the oil business and thus spiked prices? Hahaha!

Well, they don't address my scorn directly, but I notice that, quickly enough, they went on to explain that "Energy prices fell 7.0 percent in October, after a 7.2 percent decline the month before. Gasoline prices fell 11.1 percent, following a 13.5 percent decrease for September. Fuel oil costs fell 6.1 percent. Natural gas prices dropped a record 7.7 percent."

Well, this lack of price inflation must be big news to FieldandStream.blogs.com, from whence comes the headline "Ammo Shortage: Panic Now! Beat the Rush!" They write "In case you haven't noticed, the price of ammunition has been rising slowly, and it is not about to stop. Not by a durn sight. The reason is that the prices of the metals that go into almost all ammo-lead, copper, and zinc-have risen exponentially. Here are some examples: In 45 days this year, the price of lead went up 31 percent. In one day this year, the price of copper went up 7 percent. The prices of lead, zinc, and copper have gone up 300 percent in the last three years."

300% inflation in three years! I am agog!

I expect Ben Bernanke to write this worrywart to inform him that after a Hedonic Inflation Adjustment, the same kind that is proudly used by government and government lapdogs alike to discount price inflation, there was no increase in price!

This is possible because of the sleazy new hedonic smoothing devices cooked up by Michael Boskin and the equally despicable Alan Greenspan, one of which is the Substitution Effect, which means that so many customers were turned off by the higher prices of ammo that they substituted a cheaper alternative in their market basket of armaments, namely kitchen knives and cleavers, which are lower in price.

Therefore, using this magical technique, there was actually a huge deflation in the Weaponry Price Index (WPI)! Therefore, the Federal Reserve is fully justified in heading off this terrifying deflation, which is why the terrified Federal Reserve is creating so terrifyingly much excess money and credit even as we speak!

The editors, with a stunned look on their faces, look at me like I am crazy. In return, I think that they are crazy if they don't understand that the Federal Reserve and the government are lying to them about inflation. It's a tense moment, an uneasy standoff, until they, abruptly, rudely dismiss the official methodology of the Federal Reserve! They instead keep doggedly insisting that there is actual inflation in bullet prices because (and they apparently think that this is important) they are standing right there looking at prices going up!

Furthermore, they can even explain it, which they do by saying "There are a couple of reasons for this: China and India are now manufacturing stuff that requires the three metals, and they want their share. And, as with oil refineries, there are only so many smelters that can transform ore into metal."

Their summation of the situation was "So if you think that ammo and components are expensive now (actually, they aren't), you ain't seen nothin' yet!"

But I ain't buying this apparent drop in officially-measured price inflation, either, as falling prices in a rampant monetary inflation, especially a stupefying, excessive, massive, insane monetary inflation like the world is seeing now, defies the entire history of economics. Hahaha! I laugh in scorn and derision, making my big ol' funky Mogambo butt (BOFMB) jiggle and shake at anyone who thinks otherwise. And so the continuation of the rise in the prices of oil, bullets, gold, silver, pizza, sugared soft drinks and yummy chocolate confections will be doubly sweet, as my BOFMB will be bigger and more jiggly.

But since the government admitted that prices are still going up, only more slowly, it is therefore very interesting that the Real Wealth Report newsletter says that "Inflation is going to continue to accelerate higher" because "Overall, producer prices - the prices of goods produced by manufacturers and that are ultimately passed on to consumers - are currently rising faster than consumer prices, at an annual rate of more than 7.2%."

I gasp in horror! 7.2%! This is inflation that is roaring, roaring, roaring out of freaking control here! What in the hell is going on?

And, as if that was not bad enough, it is going to get worse because "More than 3 billion people in China and across Asia are coming out of the dark ages ... joining Western society ... building homes ... installing modern plumbing ... buying cars ... tasting new foods ... having their desires awakened ... and consuming natural resources like never before! Believe me: When almost half the total population of the entire world suddenly begins demanding a scarce natural resource, you can count on prices shooting for the moon!"

Almost as an afterthought, we almost get blindsided by the blockbuster news "And China's demand for oil? Soaring! In fact, oil imports literally jumped off the charts in 2005 - up 45%!"

If you want a real Mogambo thrill (RMT) as your homework assignment tonight, graph out a demand curve for oil, charting "barrels per year" on the vertical Y-axis, and "years until I am dead" on the horizontal X-axis, and use that to plot the demand curve of something that increases by 45% a year.

Here's a little hint: In only ten years, with demand increasing at 45% a year, China will be using 41 times more oil than it does now right now! Hahaha! Ten years!

And, if you want another hint, then in another 10 years (for the next twenty years in all), a constant increase of 45% a year in Chinese oil demand extrapolates to 1,687 barrels of oil for every barrel they are using right now! Hahahaha! And since this astounding new demand is only considering China, and when you include all the other nations that are busily industrializing and expanding over the next twenty years, too, you find it is impossible to 1) supply that much oil and 2) keep from laughing at the ludicrous idea of oil production rising to match such an outrageous increase in demand.

And so oil will be, like it always is, everywhere, for everything, all the time, rationed by price as determined by where the demand curve meets the supply curve, and then hahaha! Guess what? Welcome to inflationary hell!

And if inflation going up is the same as the dollar going down, then foreigners who own dollar-denominated assets must be feeling some heat right about now.

And if you don't believe me, then you could call my bluff by picking up the phone and randomly calling, for instance, a Japanese person, and ask them how they are faring, investment-wise, in their dollar-denominated assets, thanks to the dollar falling in value.

But wait! I have some good news: As part of a particularly onerous court settlement, I actually did some real research, and this exhaustive Mogambo survey turned up several interesting points. Firstly, when we randomly called phone numbers in Japan, we found that the person who answered the phone always answered in Japanese! Not much immigration, I figure! So that's kind of interesting, I suppose.

Furthermore, we learned that when we said that we wished to speak with them about their investments, they all claimed "No speakee Engrish!" Subsequently, we further learned that your typical Japanese person gets all huffy when you call them a bunch of liars, because I know that they all speak English, and all I want to know is how much they have suffered in their portfolio, thanks to the dollar going down, and they keep insisting "No speakee Engrish, big Mogambo creep (BMC)!" and then hanging up on me!

Well, to make a long story short, although we have used up our entire research budget, we still have no hard data at this point, but that we are sure we are on to something significant. In our report, we noted that persistently demanding an answer to our question was strongly, strongly correlated with how angry they got when we just kept calling them back, over and over, demanding to know about their dollar-denominated investments, all of which proves, of course, that we have hit a very sensitive nerve! Very sensitive nerve, indeed!

Thus, we can safely say, thanks to this fabulous and expensive Mogambo Research Project (MRP), that Japanese investors are showing substantial losses, and they are quite angry about it.

-- From Ron R., a self-professed Mogambo Wannabe (but without the sick, perverted and gluttonous stuff, even though that is the best part of Mogambo-hood), we get a link to MarketWatch.com, where we read "Bernanke said whether to target money supply growth or interest rates to achieve the Fed's goal of price stability is a simple empirical question as to which works better. The Fed's view is that interest rates have a more stable relationship to inflation rates than the growth of money supply does."

Of course they do, you Fed morons! You adjust interest rates to changes in inflation! That is what you say you do, for crying out loud! That's your big monetary policy tool! Contemptuously, I sneer and say "Dorks!", and then I laugh.

I hear what seems to be an echo, only not as girlishly giggly as my own reedy voice. I spin around, and it is Ron, who also dismissed Bernanke, and says "Hahahahaha! Moron!", which pleases me, in that it shows that he has mastered both the Vocabulary Of The Mogambo (VOTM), and has acquired that Sensitive Mogambo Economic Sense (SMES) that allows one to detect a load of stinking dog crap without actually stepping in it.

For example, notice that the Fed cleverly defines inflation as prices, and not by its real definition, which is growth in the money supply! Hahaha! Apparently they were absent the day they taught that price inflation follows money inflation!

And I am not sure that the recent death of Milton Friedman was not caused by Ben Bernanke, chairman of the incompetent Federal Reserve, saying this crap, as this was the slap-in-the-face antithesis of what Milton Friedman believed, namely that money supply DOES matter! A lot! And I agree with Mr. Friedman, although you can see what it got him, and I'm starting to get a little more paranoid.

-- I feel it is time for me to leap atop my soapbox, and deliver yet another Stirring Mogambo Exhortation (SME) for you to buy silver, all you can, immediately, and how if you don't, then you are an idiot, because silver is going to go so up dramatically high in price (audience shouts out "How high, Mogambo?") that you will be able, for the first time ever, to literally buy your way into heaven! Religious scholars all agree that this is a very rare occurrence, and probably pretty blasphemous, too.

But, though I offer the promise of passage to paradise, people are yelling "Shut up, you stupid, blasphemous Mogambo creep (SBMC)! We're sick and tired of hearing about it, and we're sick and tired of you, too!"

Hurt and insulted, I turn the podium over to Ted Butler, writing at Jim Cook's InvestmentRarities.com site, and then I sit down in my chair, sulking and sullen.

Anyway, I'm actually glad it worked out this way, as I learn that he has some interesting ideas on how much actual silver exists in the world. He says that the highest estimate that he has seen for world-wide existing silver bullion is one billion ounces, but that most estimates vary "in the mid hundred million-ounce range."

Now, keeping that in mind, check this out: He goes on to write that inventories of silver have, since the end of WWII, fallen from 10 billion ounces to 1 billion. So, if WWII ended in 1945, which was 61 years ago, then this works out to 9 billion ounces of inventories of silver consumed in 61 years! Or, roughly, a billion ounces every seven years!

But no matter if existing above-ground silver is 200 million ounces or a billion, it is still a "lot less silver in existence than 30 to 60 years ago", and Superman could easily pick it up with one hand by this time, whereas lifting the whole erstwhile hoard of 10 billion ounces of silver in 1945 would probably have made him grunt like a pig, which is, I am sure you will agree, very telling.

Now we are down to our last 7 years of excess supply of silver, even assuming the best-case scenario, and you don't think silver is going to explode to the upside? Is there something seriously wrong with you or what?

-- And what does this all mean, macroeconomically, according to Mogambo the Magnificent (MTM)? He smiles enigmatically, and says that you know perfectly well what it means, but that you are so horrified that you don't want to admit it, and what you actually want is for The Mogambo to tell you that it ain't so, and that everything will be fine. But it is so. And it won't. And we both know it.

Ugh.

***Mogambo sez: There are reasons why gold and silver have moved up recently, and they are the same reasons that will cause gold and silver to keep going up for a long, long time, too.

So meditate on that, my Greedy Mogambo Darlings (DMD). Ommmm. Soon you will achieve cosmic enlightenment about the true secret of investing. Ommmm.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 162287
United States
11/25/2006 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Not true? Ha! Now that is an obvious crock of...

If it were not TRUE, it wouldn't be so darn complicated!!!!

Trying to understand it feels like putting your head in the blender and turning it on. Yikes!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160343
United States
11/25/2006 10:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
thanks, op

most important post on all of GLP, by far, and no question it should be pinned

but of course it's not, as fabricated fear threads rule here
big ass bump
User ID: 160226
United States
11/25/2006 10:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
rumor has it that paulson is the pointman in the admin for global warming and is at odds with his oil bosses. ahem.

[link to www.google.com]
know_one

User ID: 162028
United States
11/25/2006 10:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
wanta was _never_ an ambassador for any country, and there are _no_ 'wanta trillions' or any wanta money at all!
.
^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**^^**
so many conflicting conspiracy theories, so little evidence of any.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 161707
United States
11/25/2006 11:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
interesting read...a 32 trillion default might cause

some bother chuckle


got gold?
paladin  (OP)

User ID: 178266
United States
01/06/2007 06:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
I always keep my eye out for anything on the Wanta funds.......paladin



Top U.S. Officials Continue Monetary Rape and Pillage
TOP U.S. OFFICIALS STEALING, STEALING, STEALING ...
AS WE PREDICTED ON 2 SEPTEMBER, $ HEADS INTO FREE FALL
Sunday 3 December 2006 20:38
HANK 'CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST' PAULSON GOES FOR BROKE

TOP-LEVEL U.S. CROOKS CAN'T STOP STEALING, AND THEY HAVE BEEN EXPOSED

DIARY OF U.S. OFFICIAL SCAMMING AND OBFUSCATION IN NOVEMBER 2006

IMPORTANT UPDATE: ON 5TH DECEMBER, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE CIA ATTACKED THIS WEBSITE, WHICH IS ILLEGAL. SPECIFICALLY, THEY TRUNCATED ALL THE TEXT IN THE 'DIARY' SECTION BELOW, FROM 20 NOVEMBER ONWARDS. THE EDITOR DISCOVERED THIS AT ABOUT 11.00 PM UK TIME ON 5TH DECEMBER.

THE TEXT HAS BEEN RESTORED*.



this is a huge read.....go here...paladin


[link to tekgnosis.typepad.com]
Divinity

User ID: 178058
Spain
01/06/2007 06:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
bump
"Aether is a Quantum 2 Spin Rotating Magnetic Field that encapsulates Primary Angular Momentum and via Tensegrity forms Matter with resulting Quantum 1/2 spin.

"PHI is the direct result and first Ratio produced by this arrangement as it Cycles." Junglelord, www.thunderbolts.info
Here comes the Golden Age.

"Thought being a given is the first assertion of self-awareness; the remaining truth is simply "I am, therefore there is". Self and other, subject and object." Eyeam

"Remember me as I AM." My Brother
paladin  (OP)

User ID: 178266
United States
01/06/2007 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
[link to www.patkiley.com]


you all have to hear this radio show..

looks like Bob Chapman is in it
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 171386
United Kingdom
01/06/2007 07:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
wanta was _never_ an ambassador for any country, and there are _no_ 'wanta trillions' or any wanta money at all!
 Quoting: know_one


Oh yes he was. You know nothing. And everyone here knows you know nothing. So raise yet another of your mindless b.s. flags, because that it is always the level of your argumentation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 170927
United States
01/06/2007 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
This patkiley.com is like listening to a four year old. Jesus, you would think he would not just read the Symanski and Contrell bullshit.

Monkey better provide better evidence than this bullshit heresay.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176136
United States
01/06/2007 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
PAULSON CONFLICT OF INTEREST OVER WANTA FUNDS

 Quoting: paladin


There are NO FUCKING Wanta funds ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !




.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 65280
United States
01/07/2007 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Paladin,

when and where did Gore speak of large sums of money to help the country? links? test of a speech?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172074
Canada
01/07/2007 03:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 178433
United States
01/07/2007 03:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
The Mogambo writes about 228 billion in deposits in one week! At the rate people are spending (faster than they are earning) you gotta wonder where THAT came from!
9net
User ID: 177660
Israel
01/07/2007 04:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Heard of the expression "monetarize the debt"?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172775
United States
01/07/2007 04:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: CONSPIRACY TO STEAL WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION EXPOSED
Wanta was buying rubles from Russia at the request of then President Reagan. Wanta had worked at the White House, the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency and six other government agencies during his career.





GLP