Here IT Comes !

[link to www.etheric.com]

His examples of Subquantum Kinetics are very readable . . .

Comparison of Subquantum Kinetics
to Conventional Physics and Astronomy


Comparison to Quantum Theory and Field Theory

Conventional Physics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

Subquantum Kinetics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

1 Special and general relativity are disproven by the Sagnac, Silvertooth, and Ampere force law experiments. The subquantum kinetics (SQK) ether concept is supported by the Sagnac, Silvertooth, and Ampere force law experiments.

2 Special relativity suffers from the twin clock paradox and the light-source-velocity paradox. SQK avoids this problem.

3 Classical field theory is plagued by the field-particle dualism. SQK avoids this problem.

4 Classical field theory suffers from the infinite energy absurdity. SQK avoids this problem.

5 The wave packet model used in quantum mechanics to model a subatomic particle has the problem of gradually spreading out. Also it cannot model a particle at rest. SQK avoids this problem. Field patterns composing a subatomic particle remain structurally coherent over time, even when the particle is stationary.

6 Is plagued by the nonintuitive wave-particle dualism concept. SQK avoids this problem. Subatomic particles naturally incorporate wave aspects in their structure.

7 Does not explain what charge and mass are, or how they generate electric and gravitational fields. SQK explains what they are and how they generate such fields.

8 Fails to account for experiments showing that gravitational fields may be electrostatically induced. Considers antigravity an impossibility. SQK explains such experiments. Allows the possibility of antigravity propulsion.

9 Maxwellian electrodynamics fails to explain the induction of Tesla waves, nonpolarized longitudinal energy waves. SQK explains the induction of both transversely polarized Hertzian waves and Tesla waves.

10 Advocates the nonintuitive notion that natural events are inherently indeterminate. Accepts the Copenhagen Interpretation of the Uncertainty Relation. Retains the commonsense notion of causality. Nonlocal superluminal interactions explain the EPR experiment results. Maintains that the Uncertainty Relation is merely a statement about the limitations inherent to quantum level observation.

11 Quantum electrodynamics and general relativity, two pillars of conventional field theory, contradict one another, a problem known as the cosmological constant conundrum. SQK avoids this problem. All fields (electrostatic, magnetic, gravitational, nuclear) are encompassed within a single internally consistent theory.

12 General relativity is fatally flawed in that it allows the formation of cosmologically disruptive naked singularities. SQK avoids this problem.



Comparison to Cosmology and Astrophysics
Conventional Cosmology & Astrophysics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------
Subquantum Kinetics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

1 The big bang theory proposes the counterintuitive notion that the universe emerged out of a state of nonexistence. Subquantum kinetics (SQK) avoids this problem. Proposes that physical form emerged from a preexisting ether substrate.

2 Fails to explain how subatomic particles originate. It merely postulates that they form out of the vacuum. SQK explains in detail how subatomic particles arise from subquantum fluctuations in the ether.

3 Fails to explain why our universe is made up of matter as opposed to antimatter. SQK predicts a matter/ antimatter bias to particle materialization.

4 Introduces the ad hoc assumption that the universe is expanding, in order to account for the cosmological redshift phenomenon. SQK naturally predicts a tired-light cosmological redshift effect without introducing any ad hoc assumptions.

5 The expanding universe model fails to make a good fit to astronomical data on four cosmology tests. The tired-light static universe cosmology makes a superior fit to astronomical data on all four cosmology tests.

6 Conventional cosmology fails to explain observations of galaxies with redshifts greater than 4.0. SQK accounts for the existence of galaxies having redshifts many times higher than 4.0.

7 Conventional physics fails to explain why the jovian planets and brown dwarfs fall along the M-L relation for low mass stars, attributes this to chance. SQK explains this conformance by predicting that planets, brown dwarfs, and low mass stars are similarly powered by genic energy.

8 Fails to explain the source of the excess heat coming from the Earth's core. SQK attributes the excess heat from the Earth's core to genic energy.


9 Fails to account for the inflection (at 0.45 solar masses) in the stellar luminosity function and for the accompanying upward bend in the stellar M-L relation. SQK explains this inflection and upward bend as arising from the onset of fusion energy production and the formation of a radiative core at the star's center.

10 Fails to adequately explain stellar pulsation. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

11 Fails to explain the source of energy powering supernova explosions and why supernovae arise from blue giants. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

12 Fails to account for the energy source powering galactic core explosions. The SQK genic energy prediction explains this phenomenon.

13 General relativity predicts that massive, highly luminous galactic cores should exist as matter-consuming black holes. But this prediction fails to conform with observation. SQK predicts that black holes should not form, that galactic cores should instead consist of very dense stellar bodies that continually create matter and energy. This predictionis supported by observation.




Note: genic energy is the name given to the excess energy that is produced by the photon blue-shifting phenomenon predicted by subquantum kinetics.




Philosophy and Metaphysics
Conventional Physics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------
Subquantum Kinetics

-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

1 Is based on positivism. Does not recognize the existence of an unobservable spiritual realm. Contradicts mystical teachings. Subquantum kinetics (SQK) derives from general systems principles. Admits the possibility of an unseen realm. Harmonizes with mystical teachings.

2
Is the only science that hangs on to the mechanical, closed-system model. SQK adopts the open system model similar to that eventually adopted in other sciences.

3 Is made up of a conglomeration of theories that are sometimes incompatible with one another. SQK consists of a unitary theory.

Same old pics...

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

can someone please tell me why so many sources say we're going to 4d and others say we're going to 5d? this is getting really confusing

We are already in 4D, 1 time and 3 space dimensions. Some people forget to count the time dimension and start rabbiting on about the space dimensions only.

The accessing of another dimension from the six curled up quantum dimensions that tame the quantum foam may mean that we will be able to peel away another onion skin separating us from spirit! just a thought.

Taking the formulas for gravity, electricity and magnetism copied from a book on the previous page, it looks as if there might be an inverse relationship between gravity and magnetism because the 'm' term is -ve squared in gravity and turns positive in electricity and magnetism.




Substituting the values in the formula, and then substituting terms in the units of measurement lead to some interesting observations.


The formula.

k(g) x k(e) = k(m)

1 / (3 . 10^8)^2 x 9 . 10^9 = 1 . 10^-7

The 1 / 3^2 x 9 becomes a 1

Powers are supposed to be added when multiplying, but inverting the ^2 of the 10^8 makes it (1/10^8)^2 which apparently is 10^-16, and so the difference between 10^-16 and 10^9 = 10^-7, which fits the formula


Units of measurement.


k(g) ....m^-2 sec^2

k(e) ....N.m^2 / C^2, (where N = k(g) . m . sec^-2)
k(e) ....k(g) . m . sec^-2 . m^2 / C^2
k(e) ....m^-2 sec^2 . m . sec^-2 . m^2 / C^2
k(e) ....sec^2 . m . sec^-2 / C^2
k(e) ....m / C^2

k(m) = 1 . 10^-7 ....mk(g) / C^2


k(g) x k(e) = k(m)

m^-2 sec^2 x m / C^2 = mk(g) / C^2
m^-2 sec^2 x m / C^2 = m . m^-2 sec^2 / C^2
(1/m)^2 sec^2 x m / C^2 = m . (1/m)^2 sec^2 / C^2
1/m . 1/m sec^2 x m /C^2 = m . 1/m . 1/m sec^2 / C^2
1/m . 1/m sec^2 x m /C^2 = 1/m sec^2 /C^2

So is magnetism equal to time (sec^2) divided by 'm' times the speed of light squared (1/(m x C^2)?

sec^2 / (m x C^2) is magnetism?


Which if so would give an inverse relationship between magnetism and gravity, and may explain the apparently quantum leaps that this Planet-X anomaly is displaying, showing movement or position but not both at the same time... Pushing energy into such a thing as in Antartic Astronomer's, "Theyr’e going to use the planetary electrical field to initiate solar field doppler to time shift the anomaly" (p. 12), might cause it to reciprocate as in oscillate or change between movement and appearance. Will it?

In the 'units of measurement' for magnetism, I should not have left the formula, for then the relationship would have stood-out better.

Units of measurement.


k(g) ....m^-2 sec^2

k(e) ....m / C^2

k(m) = ....mk(g) / C^2


Magnetism is 'm' times the formula for gravity / the speed of light squared.

It's the gravity which has the -ve square in it, (1/m)^2.

The solar storm must be going pretty bad because the 'magnetosphere simulation' isn't really reading the situation [link to www2.nict.go.jp] , and SOHO C2 and C3 haven't been updated in 26 hours.

I wonder if they're still going to try to use the plasma weapon canon to time-shift the Planet X anomaly and Houston will talk the astronauts already onboard the International Space Station through the procedure and not wait for the European specialist, Christer Fuglesang, to arrive. They've already got all the equipment onboard to do it - the magneto-hydrodynamic stabilizer and the NSTX magnetic fusion device which had modifications done to it on the last shuttle mission in September are already on the ISS. Since the realtime images of C2 and C3 are doppler images ("the MDI images that are shown on our real-time pages", p. 13) and updates are suspended now, they might be using that machine - the Michelson Doppler Imager - to aim the plasma canon at the anomaly to coordinate the procedure.



If security is still high, then perhaps this action is being undertaken. The lack of information, poor quality or no updates, certainly leaves one in a state of not knowing.

About the soho lasco c3 images.. I try to keep up with them to see if it really is planet x and how this dark spot evolves.. but it seems like alot of the images is not found recently.. why does the date jump from december 04/2006 --> december 07/2006.. looking at the archives this seems new.. planet x is appearing and suddenly they have alot of problems publishing the images?

It seems that the anomaly has moved from the 10 o'clock to the 3 o'clock position. It moved sometime during the x9 and x6 solar flares on the 5th and 6th of December when SOHO was down and is now appearing as a short dark streak on the right side of the sun. The dark streak is due to a light overload on the sensors causing an inversion of the image from light to dark, as was discussed by simitar on page 6.

BEFORE 12/04 0818 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

AFTER 12/06 2018 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]


The solar flare on the 8th and 9th of December showed it.

12/08 2148 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
12/08 2221 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
12/08 2335 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
12/09 0026 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]


The short thick dark line is persisting.

12/09 0253 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

12/10 1418 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

from what position and perspective are the soho sun images acquired? that is, what ever takes the images, where exactly is it located?

neti, thank you, on behalf of all humans everywhere, for your brilliance.

Just thinking aloud, wondering if it's not planet x, but some Suncruisers coming in from the Light (benevolent) and our Slavemasters are trying to destroy them??? Whatever it is/they are, it's tough enough to have stood the direct hit from the sun!!!?

Div

terran,

It's on page 13-

"the spacecraft traverses its highly elliptical orbit around the L1 Lagrangian point, some 1.5 million kilometres sunward of the Earth." [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

From the definition of Lagrangian point [link to en.wikipedia.org] it looks as if the SOHO satellite stays always between the Earth and the sun. I don't quite know how that rotation works though, because in the picture at the link, the satellite's orbit is tipped at an angle to the orbit of the earth around the sun and it looks as if its orbit is around some imaginary point in space called the "lagrangian point" which lies between the earth and the sun.

Divinity,

LOL. I just keep reminding myself that this Planet-X is raising the vibrations of the Earth, and that the changes will come more slowly if we don't mess things up by trying to "time-shift" the anomaly with the particle canon onboard the International Space Station since the last shuttle mission in September. Christer Fuglesang's purpose in joining this mission is to operate the MHD (magneto-hydrodynamic) beam weapon to target the anomaly. I only hope they rethink the consequences of doing this....

The x9 and x6 class flares on the 5th and 6th of December prove to us that something much more powerful than the "earth planetary electrical field" is out there.

AC 168060,

You might like to explain your bs post - put some reasoning behind it.

My only thought in asking that question is that objects 'jump state' when their energy levels get to a certain critical mass. This, too, might explain why the earth will rise into 4th density. It will 'jump state' and we're in the preliminary stages of that now when the human consciousness is having to adjust to increased energy, and we're seeing the symptoms of that in anxiety and emotional outbursts. We probably need to recognize the symptoms and their cause and try and adjust the best we can while not going overboard and doing something stupid, like going to war.

>>Christer Fuglesang's purpose in joining this mission is to operate the MHD (magneto-hydrodynamic) beam weapon to target the anomaly. I only hope they rethink the consequences of doing this....>>

WOW! You sure they're not trying to avert the Awakening?
Oh well, time will tell!

Ok you lost me.

Can anyone > neti , divinity , artic astronomer , scimitar or even the lone ranger , link to something that proves there is / was a MHD stabilizer and NSTX modifications carried on any sts mission and then installed on the ISS .

Thanks ,

me_says

AC 1358,

About what?

The short dark stubby line on the right of the sun at 3 o'clock is still there. It's caused by too much light energy causing an inversion of the color from light to dark. Scimitar explains it twice, once on page 2 and again on page 6.






The detector was not damaged, see the confirmation from a NASA employee which scimitar posted on page 7.





So there is a light source sitting next to the sun that is putting out a lot of energy. Before SOHO was turned, it showed up as two dark images at 10 o'clock, one with dark "bleed lines" of light energy through it, which is identified as an anomaly the size of Saturn that is exhibiting quantum behavior (location OR movement but not both, like an electron), and a tubular dust cloud. After SOHO was turned on the Dec 5th, and after the two x-class solar flares, these two dark images on SOHO C3 pictures were no longer visible. Instead they were replaced by an apparently exceptionally short dark line on the right side of the sun at 3 o'clock.

Antartic Astronomer said that the size of the dust cloud was revealed by the CME solar flare on the 30th of November (he said 1st Dec).

Nov 30 1142 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

Nov 30 1942 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]


A second solar flare on 8th and 9th of December showed a very similar pattern of flaring around an object.

Dec 8 2148 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
Dec 8 2221 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
Dec 8 2335 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]
Dec 9 0026 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]


So the anomaly must have moved between Dec 4 when SOHO went down and Dec 6 when SOHO came up again, showing its quantum properties. It jumped a long distance in a very short space of time.

The other jump it displayed was on November 8th and 9th.

Nov 8 1742 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

Nov 9 1742 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

The horizontal bleed line moved from the right to the left of the sun, and is seen on the 9th as a line crossing over the surface of Venus.

So we've seen two jumps now of this quantum anomaly that emits enough light energy to overpower the sensors, turning its images, or apparition, dark.

ME_SAYS,

Yes, I can but the auto-b'n on GLP won't take it. LOL.


It Trinity will make an exception, then I'll post it.

Neti ,

Can you identify the dust cloud in a pic for us , im not seeing it ?

Can you clarify when the MHD stabilizer and NSTX modifications were done in the iss or is this an ongoing work ?

Thanks

So there is a light source sitting next to the sun that is putting out a lot of energy. Before SOHO was turned, it showed up as two dark images at 10 o'clock, one with dark "bleed lines" of light energy through it, which is identified as an anomaly the size of Saturn that is exhibiting quantum behavior (location OR movement but not both, like an electron), and a tubular dust cloud.

Trinity , will you allow neti to post this important info ?

Thanks in advance

ME_SAYS,

Here are the two posts.


SHR
9/11/2006
8:45 am ..........Re: Russian Insider, p. 14

Btw what do you think of asymmetric spherical capacitors?<<<
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! That old trick snake? You still think you can crush our FO's? Like back in the old days??? Cause ICH when you feel like it anymore? LOL, you are losing, you couldn't stop Atlantis! All you could cause was a delay, now once the MHD stabalizer has been installed in the ISS it'll be our turn, again. There are enough EDC's thanks to our spraying efforts to wipe our planet free of you parasitic snakes once and for all! It is humans that will once again reign supreme thanks to the efforts and sacrifice of brave Assets like Omega and 2X and the days of tyranny by you souless, sexless, empathical cold blooded reptillians is coming to a resounding end!

Stop the Habbitation of Reptillians!!!


SHR
9/11/2006
8:49 am ..........Re: Russian Insider, p. 14

It's a fact that they must sell us the big doom and make us to eat it before they can unleash it.<<<
You and your scaley pals are finished! Suck plasma reptoid! The NSTX modifications are DONE !!! HAHA! Wasn't counting on that were you? The Doom is coming alright, but it isn't coming for humans!

thanks neti , Ive heard of shr but I had no idea about him / her . Ill have to look into shr some more .

Thanks again ,

Ps: anymore insight you can lend is greatly appreciated :)

me_says

Can you post a link to the Russian Insider thread or is gone?

Can you post a link to the Russian Insider thread or is gone?


Here you go ac , there are 2 more posts with little activity . These 2 are the main posts you seek

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

me_says

ME_SAYS,

The acronyms which SHR is using are:


FO = Field Officers or Field Operations

ICH = Intracranial haemorrage

MHD = Magnetohydrodynamic

EDC = Endocrine disrupting compound, ethylene di-bromide

NSTX - National Spherical Torus Experiment



The dust cloud. It's not very easy to see before the November 30th CME explosion, but you can see it afterwards. The CME is head right for it in the first picture.

Nov 30 1018 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

Dec 01 0618 [link to soho.nascom.nasa.gov]

In the second picture, the dust cloud is sitting below the line of the anomaly, presumed to be Planet-X. And I guess the dust cloud and and the red dwarf of Planet-X are associated.