Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,519 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,263,358
Pageviews Today: 1,976,597Threads Today: 550Posts Today: 10,636
06:38 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 163775
United States
11/29/2006 10:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime
so what is the thought about police tactics?



DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime


Updated: November 29th, 2006 02:05 PM PDT

AP Online
via NewsEdge Corporation


LOS ANGELES_The district attorney's office will not file charges against 11 police officers involved in the fatal shooting of a toddler during a gunbattle with her father last year.

Nineteen-month-old Suzie Pena was being used as a human shield by her father, District Attorney Steve Cooley said in memo made public Tuesday.

Relying on a review of the scene and reports gathered by the police department, prosecutors found the SWAT officers were trying to defend themselves and others when they accidentally killed the child, Cooley said.

The father, Jose Raul Pena, exchanged gunfire with police during the hours-long July 2005 standoff before he was fatally shot. There were illegal drugs in his system and traces of cocaine in the toddler's system, officials said.

The girl's death raised questions about police tactics and led to an internal LAPD investigation and separate FBI and district attorney's office probes.

District attorney investigators concluded SWAT team officers had reason to shoot at Pena after he opened fire on them. One officer was struck by a bullet fired by Pena.

"The officers ... entered the office where Pena held Suzie hostage, and in fear for their lives and the lives of others, the officers fired several rounds at Pena," the memo said.

The Los Angeles Police Commission was to determine later Tuesday whether any of the officers violated department policy.

Investigators in the 15-month internal probe were unable to determine which officer fired the shot that killed the girl, Chief William Bratton said Monday.

"That's unfortunate, but that's pretty much where we are with it," Bratton told the Los Angeles Times.

An attorney representing the child's mother has filed a claim against the city as a precursor to a lawsuit.

<<AP Online -- 11/29/06>>
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 163775
United States
11/29/2006 10:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime
sorry...here's the link:

[link to www.officer.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160425
United States
11/29/2006 11:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime
How horrible.

I don't think anyone, even a modern police officer, would willingly have shot that child.

I doubt it was a crime on their parts.

I don't know what they could have done differently that would of worked. (You really can't just let him run off with a gun and a toddler...)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 163775
United States
11/29/2006 11:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DA: LAPD Shooting of Child Wasn't Crime
How horrible.

I don't think anyone, even a modern police officer, would willingly have shot that child.

I doubt it was a crime on their parts.

I don't know what they could have done differently that would of worked. (You really can't just let him run off with a gun and a toddler...)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 160425

horrible...yep...that a child was killed.

run off with a gun and toddler??? the father was in an office (four walls) when the killing of the toddler occurred.

there is a reason there are officers trained as snipers...





GLP