US Air Force Whistle Blower Blows The Whistle On CHEMTRAILS being sprayed by US govt!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody over that age who would deny there was an abrupt change in the way contrails looked and behaved from the late 90s onward is either: A> Not someone who watched the sky much prior to the late 90s. B> A shill looking to detract from the truth that things have, indeed, changed dramatically, or... C> A bald-faced liar. D> Mentally challenged. There are no other options. PERIOD. |
Menow User ID: 71988611 United States 04/08/2016 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Menow 71988611 You know the science quite well, you might just be fist string, just a poorer liar. You are asserting that was NOT just a wing vortex test? Just do a historical image search on it. Sometimes they have been reversed, but that WAS just smoke generators for a vortex test. Condensation from a compressed gas decompressing is what you see. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 And? There is a high and low pressure at that point and the differential is enough that when the compressed air decompresses and expands, you get a condensate trail. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 And? If an additional additive that makes condensation happen faster is in the gas, then it will appear as a normal event because it is difficult to spot. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 Huh? You are apparently making a factual assertion. Have any evidence to support YOUR version of this conspiracy THEORY? I'm sure you don't. What we are dealing with is the difference from natural VS unnatural precipitation. The Chemicals allow the air to precipitate and retain moisture more so than untreated air. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 That's quite a THEORY. Have any evidence to support it? Chemtrail treated air it is a moisture magnet that is affected by concentration, dispersion, temperature and pressure like any gas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 See above. Evidence? It is admitted that they way the effect is monitored is with measured water vapor in solution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 See above. Evidence? Fact is, normal persistent contrails exist, always have, and there is NO real evidence that what we see in the sky have changed into anything else. |
FizzGreen User ID: 71462291 United States 04/08/2016 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heavy chemtrails in my area today sick of this chemtrail garbage only the truly retarded among us can't see the chemhell spray operation and the shitbag shill's can lick my asshole. Fuck Chemtrails. Trump-Nugent 2016 God, Family, Country....making America great. "Whatever luck I had, I made, I was never a natural athlete, but I paid my dues in sweat and concentration and took the time necessary to learn karate and become world champion." -Chuck Norris |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | terribly bad spin, your hem is showing. A-10's crop dust for Marines. A contrail is a Condensate trail, it is a forced mechanical phenomena of condensation in cold air, it cools, it goes away. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 Anti aircraft heat seekers look for turbo jets, A-10 turbo fans are way cooler because they have to be. what is your next line of expert BS? Huh? Contrails form when it is minus 40 or below. It is cooling which CAUSES them to form, because the condensed moisture FREEZES into ice crystals. If an A-10 flew where it was minus 40 and 60% RH it WOULD form contrails, like any other plane which has engines burning fossil fuels. really? how come I can see heat from a gas furnace exhaust on a cold day That is distortion due to heat waves. You are NOT seeing water vapor, which is an invisible gas. "Condensate", by its very definition, is NOT A gas. and it's not even freezing out? Cars make condensate trails, how come they don't linger? Because it's not 40 below. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 You cranks really need to study the water cycle and things that can affect the temperature at which a condensate can form in clean air, then add some particulates. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 For contrails to form, it has to be about minus 40. This is WELL-known science. One method to store solar heat used calcium carbonate in solution in tubes. The solution would change states from solid to liquid at very low temperatures so one could store the heat from the sun. An additive was used to help accelerate crystal formation, without it it was sluggish to change states from liquid to solid. Te additive was sawdust. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 you changed the focus again,what happened to that first string shill? Second string is way too stupid to try to educate. What does any of that last bit have to do with contrail formation and persistence? Nothing at all. Keep reading the mail shill. You must be a real idiot. The particles mess up the air. They allow moisture to stay suspended in solution in higher concentrations. Been a few days since they sprayed out west, the concentrations are high to the degree there is visible wispy patches on record heat days, that means the particulate count is high in somewhat dispersed zones or that area has collected what moisture it can, given the conditions. A CAM online shows the coastal clouds in a condensate state. What happens is this weather will suck moisture and transport it east to precipitate in a huge storm. Spraying offshore goes unnoticed for the most part, and what makes landfall is well dispersed. |
Menow User ID: 71988611 United States 04/08/2016 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody under 25 years of age is in no business to enter this debate whatsoever, as they are too young to know ANYTHING about what aircraft used to leave behind them in the 20s-90s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Anybody over that age who would deny there was an abrupt change in the way contrails looked and behaved from the late 90s onward is either: A> Not someone who watched the sky much prior to the late 90s. B> A shill looking to detract from the truth that things have, indeed, changed dramatically, or... C> A bald-faced liar. D> Mentally challenged. There are no other options. PERIOD. There was nothing "abrupt" about the increase in persistent contrails... only your NOTICING of it having taken place. If links work here, here is a study of when people first NOTICED persistent contrails, showing how believers are in almost NO agreement on when they started. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] |
Menow User ID: 71988611 United States 04/08/2016 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 71988611 United States 04/08/2016 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
uscrusader1 User ID: 65794755 United States 04/08/2016 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 71988611 Huh? Contrails form when it is minus 40 or below. It is cooling which CAUSES them to form, because the condensed moisture FREEZES into ice crystals. If an A-10 flew where it was minus 40 and 60% RH it WOULD form contrails, like any other plane which has engines burning fossil fuels. really? how come I can see heat from a gas furnace exhaust on a cold day That is distortion due to heat waves. You are NOT seeing water vapor, which is an invisible gas. "Condensate", by its very definition, is NOT A gas. and it's not even freezing out? Cars make condensate trails, how come they don't linger? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 Because it's not 40 below. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22021700 ... For contrails to form, it has to be about minus 40. This is WELL-known science. ... What does any of that last bit have to do with contrail formation and persistence? Nothing at all. Keep reading the mail shill. You must be a real idiot. The particles mess up the air. They allow moisture to stay suspended in solution in higher concentrations. Been a few days since they sprayed out west, the concentrations are high to the degree there is visible wispy patches on record heat days, that means the particulate count is high in somewhat dispersed zones or that area has collected what moisture it can, given the conditions. A CAM online shows the coastal clouds in a condensate state. What happens is this weather will suck moisture and transport it east to precipitate in a huge storm. Spraying offshore goes unnoticed for the most part, and what makes landfall is well dispersed. No edits for AC's! Too funny. A classic. Here is an example of 'noble the GLP banned shill' forgetting to reset his IP and having a ludicrous argument with himself, thinking he was logged in as his other userid. A pathetic and low IQ Chemtrail thread shill, logging in from the short bus again. :) Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 04/08/2016 04:40 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody under 25 years of age is in no business to enter this debate whatsoever, as they are too young to know ANYTHING about what aircraft used to leave behind them in the 20s-90s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Anybody over that age who would deny there was an abrupt change in the way contrails looked and behaved from the late 90s onward is either: A> Not someone who watched the sky much prior to the late 90s. B> A shill looking to detract from the truth that things have, indeed, changed dramatically, or... C> A bald-faced liar. D> Mentally challenged. There are no other options. PERIOD. There was nothing "abrupt" about the increase in persistent contrails... only your NOTICING of it having taken place. If links work here, here is a study of when people first NOTICED persistent contrails, showing how believers are in almost NO agreement on when they started. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] For me in Northern Maine I can tell you EXACTLY when they changed, and I have been an observer of the skies since the mid-60s as well as an amateur astronomer, so don't try feeding me your immature B.S.; because it ain't going to work on me. They began laying down parallel tracks of billowing trails THAT WERE RADICALLY DIFFERENT all up and along the Great Circle Route (to Europe) here in southern Aroostook County in February of 1999. The skies here have not been the same since, although they seem to have lessened the degree of spraying in the past couple of years here. I have actually seen four craft running parallel at the same altitude heading southwest TURN and come back northeast on a more north-westerly track, as though plowing a field. I have also seen them turn off the spraying, and turn it back on again, mid flight. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody under 25 years of age is in no business to enter this debate whatsoever, as they are too young to know ANYTHING about what aircraft used to leave behind them in the 20s-90s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Anybody over that age who would deny there was an abrupt change in the way contrails looked and behaved from the late 90s onward is either: A> Not someone who watched the sky much prior to the late 90s. B> A shill looking to detract from the truth that things have, indeed, changed dramatically, or... C> A bald-faced liar. D> Mentally challenged. There are no other options. PERIOD. go talk to Sailplane enthusiasts about clouds. Ask them what they think. I talked to a NOAA hottie once and asked her about the trails and I got giggles and a smile. She may be a good weather girl but she did not even want to go there, to blow there or Ho there. This summer is going to be a cooker. Out west the mornings have chemtrail hangover till about 1PM in some areas, then it gets hot enough for the state to change and the moisture laden hot air sucks up local moisture like a sponge. |
Ag47 User ID: 1201724 United States 04/08/2016 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | P.S. I don't doubt they started the programs at different dates in different locales, and just because people say different things about when they first noticed the changes PROVES NOTHING other than there was a varying point at which they noticed the changes. See how simple your foolish arguments are devastated?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody under 25 years of age is in no business to enter this debate whatsoever, as they are too young to know ANYTHING about what aircraft used to leave behind them in the 20s-90s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Anybody over that age who would deny there was an abrupt change in the way contrails looked and behaved from the late 90s onward is either: A> Not someone who watched the sky much prior to the late 90s. B> A shill looking to detract from the truth that things have, indeed, changed dramatically, or... C> A bald-faced liar. D> Mentally challenged. There are no other options. PERIOD. There was nothing "abrupt" about the increase in persistent contrails... only your NOTICING of it having taken place. If links work here, here is a study of when people first NOTICED persistent contrails, showing how believers are in almost NO agreement on when they started. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] For me in Northern Maine I can tell you EXACTLY when they changed, and I have been an observer of the skies since the mid-60s as well as an amateur astronomer, so don't try feeding me your immature B.S.; because it ain't going to work on me. They began laying down parallel tracks of billowing trails THAT WERE RADICALLY DIFFERENT all up and along the Great Circle Route (to Europe) here in southern Aroostook County in February of 1999. The skies here have not been the same since, although they seem to have lessened the degree of spraying in the past couple of years here. I have actually seen four craft running parallel at the same altitude heading southwest TURN and come back northeast on a more north-westerly track, as though plowing a field. I have also seen them turn off the spraying, and turn it back on again, mid flight. Eff them. If it is not happening then no harm no foul. They have SAM radar capabilities. I saw a cop point a radar gun at one once and guess what happened to the flow?? |
Helios Maximus User ID: 70735592 United States 04/08/2016 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few points from my personal observations and experience as a life-long skywatcher and amateur astronomer. 1) Natural contrails were a very rare sight in the '60's, '70's & '80's. The few I witnessed were from fighter jets and hi-flying military aircraft--never from passenger jets (which were plentiful). 2) When I first moved to Las Vegas, NV in 1996; it was infrequent to even see ANY cloud of ANY type. It was that dry....just blue sky and oppressive sun day after day after day. Then in 1998 strange tic-tac-toe grids started appearing in the sky turning it grayish-white within a few hours and filling the valley with smog. This became the 'new normal'. None of the aircraft were landing, circling, or taking off from McCarren Airport. Aside from military bases, I know of no other airports within 150 miles of Vegas. 3) Now I live on the East Coast in a very high-traffic air corridor. Any given 'spray-day' I could point out to any open-minded observer that only certain jets are leaving trails. Other airliners flying nearby or even close to the tankers leave no contrails whatsoever. This is irrefutable proof to me of an 'operation'. 4) I can now predict with a fair degree of accuracy when and where the chemtrailing will occur. You will find that most often spraying (especially near metropolitan ares) is most intense at sunrise and late afternoon almost always in the direction of the sun (I believe this is to avoid being obvious, though the diffusion of sunlight is a consideration). Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop. 5) Weather forecasters now leave clues telling you days in advance when to expect chemtrails. Some even have new graphics showing wispy non-clouds and use phraseology such as 'growing cirrus clouds later today'....and you can go out and watch them GROWING (unnaturally). 6) I've had the pleasure of living in a half-dozen states over the past 15 years. Once you see the same patterns of chemtrailling, you can easily find on a map which military bases are involved in these flights. Presently I'm between Dover and MacGuire airfields--and every chemtrail flight is headed toward one or the other. And remember.....WHERE THERE'S SHILLS, THERE'S TRUTH TO HIDE! The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Inaugural Address, 1801 It is not only vain, but wicked, in a legislator to frame laws in opposition to the laws of nature, and to arm them with the terrors of death. This is truly creating crimes in order to punish them. ~ Thomas Jefferson, 1779 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All it would take is one very smart and determined lawyer to sue the airlines for intentional deprivation of natural sunlight because of the spraying. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71488293 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | P.S. I don't doubt they started the programs at different dates in different locales, and just because people say different things about when they first noticed the changes PROVES NOTHING other than there was a varying point at which they noticed the changes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 See how simple your foolish arguments are devastated?? poor rob stumpf: pedophile, cyber stalker, failed attorney and psycho internet contrary troll |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All it would take is one very smart and determined lawyer to sue the airlines for intentional deprivation of natural sunlight because of the spraying. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71488293 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. A weeks worth of video could prove their case easily. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few points from my personal observations and experience as a life-long skywatcher and amateur astronomer. Quoting: Helios Maximus 1) Natural contrails were a very rare sight in the '60's, '70's & '80's. The few I witnessed were from fighter jets and hi-flying military aircraft--never from passenger jets (which were plentiful). 2) When I first moved to Las Vegas, NV in 1996; it was infrequent to even see ANY cloud of ANY type. It was that dry....just blue sky and oppressive sun day after day after day. Then in 1998 strange tic-tac-toe grids started appearing in the sky turning it grayish-white within a few hours and filling the valley with smog. This became the 'new normal'. None of the aircraft were landing, circling, or taking off from McCarren Airport. Aside from military bases, I know of no other airports within 150 miles of Vegas. 3) Now I live on the East Coast in a very high-traffic air corridor. Any given 'spray-day' I could point out to any open-minded observer that only certain jets are leaving trails. Other airliners flying nearby or even close to the tankers leave no contrails whatsoever. This is irrefutable proof to me of an 'operation'. 4) I can now predict with a fair degree of accuracy when and where the chemtrailing will occur. You will find that most often spraying (especially near metropolitan ares) is most intense at sunrise and late afternoon almost always in the direction of the sun (I believe this is to avoid being obvious, though the diffusion of sunlight is a consideration). Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop. 5) Weather forecasters now leave clues telling you days in advance when to expect chemtrails. Some even have new graphics showing wispy non-clouds and use phraseology such as 'growing cirrus clouds later today'....and you can go out and watch them GROWING (unnaturally). 6) I've had the pleasure of living in a half-dozen states over the past 15 years. Once you see the same patterns of chemtrailling, you can easily find on a map which military bases are involved in these flights. Presently I'm between Dover and MacGuire airfields--and every chemtrail flight is headed toward one or the other. And remember.....WHERE THERE'S SHILLS, THERE'S TRUTH TO HIDE! OMG!! Another truth teller. Don't you know truthers are BAD, BAD people?? (Bless, you brother.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop." ====== Bingo. IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME HERE in northern Maine, and has been since that February day in 1999 when they first began "plowing the skies" here. WELL DONE!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 ====== Bingo. IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME HERE in northern Maine, and has been since that February day in 1999 when they first began "plowing the skies" here. WELL DONE!!!! Plowing the skies. It really does look like that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All it would take is one very smart and determined lawyer to sue the airlines for intentional deprivation of natural sunlight because of the spraying. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71488293 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. A weeks worth of video could prove their case easily. Yea, but there all lilly-livered leeches sucking on the government and corporate-world teats. I haven't met a brave lawyer since Gerry Spence gave it up... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All it would take is one very smart and determined lawyer to sue the airlines for intentional deprivation of natural sunlight because of the spraying. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71488293 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. A weeks worth of video could prove their case easily. Yea, but there all lilly-livered leeches sucking on the government and corporate-world teats. I haven't met a brave lawyer since Gerry Spence gave it up... So lawyers can close down coal mining because of coal dust but can do this, I doubt it. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 65794755 United States 04/08/2016 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 ====== Bingo. IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME HERE in northern Maine, and has been since that February day in 1999 when they first began "plowing the skies" here. WELL DONE!!!! Plowing the skies. It really does look like that. Thread: Chemtrail HQ 2020 Discussion Thread Shill-Free&Moderated- post your sightings, safe posting zone, CT thread compilations, and no contrails (Page 2) Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 04/08/2016 04:39 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few points from my personal observations and experience as a life-long skywatcher and amateur astronomer. Quoting: Helios Maximus 1) Natural contrails were a very rare sight in the '60's, '70's & '80's. The few I witnessed were from fighter jets and hi-flying military aircraft--never from passenger jets (which were plentiful). 2) When I first moved to Las Vegas, NV in 1996; it was infrequent to even see ANY cloud of ANY type. It was that dry....just blue sky and oppressive sun day after day after day. Then in 1998 strange tic-tac-toe grids started appearing in the sky turning it grayish-white within a few hours and filling the valley with smog. This became the 'new normal'. None of the aircraft were landing, circling, or taking off from McCarren Airport. Aside from military bases, I know of no other airports within 150 miles of Vegas. 3) Now I live on the East Coast in a very high-traffic air corridor. Any given 'spray-day' I could point out to any open-minded observer that only certain jets are leaving trails. Other airliners flying nearby or even close to the tankers leave no contrails whatsoever. This is irrefutable proof to me of an 'operation'. 4) I can now predict with a fair degree of accuracy when and where the chemtrailing will occur. You will find that most often spraying (especially near metropolitan ares) is most intense at sunrise and late afternoon almost always in the direction of the sun (I believe this is to avoid being obvious, though the diffusion of sunlight is a consideration). Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop. 5) Weather forecasters now leave clues telling you days in advance when to expect chemtrails. Some even have new graphics showing wispy non-clouds and use phraseology such as 'growing cirrus clouds later today'....and you can go out and watch them GROWING (unnaturally). 6) I've had the pleasure of living in a half-dozen states over the past 15 years. Once you see the same patterns of chemtrailling, you can easily find on a map which military bases are involved in these flights. Presently I'm between Dover and MacGuire airfields--and every chemtrail flight is headed toward one or the other. And remember.....WHERE THERE'S SHILLS, THERE'S TRUTH TO HIDE! I could be where you were at in the 60's. I saw dissipating contrails but nothing lasting hours. Thrust jet engines were dirty to the degree you could see a high level trail by the shadow it left on lower formations. On weather forecasts, I have seen repeatedly warm hot forecasts get trashed by the next day's lingering haze. You can see high concentrations of the dispersed stuff in freaky rainbows in clouds or around the sun on scorching days. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69768514 United States 04/08/2016 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. A weeks worth of video could prove their case easily. Yea, but there all lilly-livered leeches sucking on the government and corporate-world teats. I haven't met a brave lawyer since Gerry Spence gave it up... So lawyers can close down coal mining because of coal dust but can do this, I doubt it. Wake up, you little millenial douche canoe. COAL MINING IS SOMETHING THE AGENDA 21 WORSHIPERS AT THE U.N. AND D.C. WANT STOPPED. Got a clue now, dufus? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few points from my personal observations and experience as a life-long skywatcher and amateur astronomer. Quoting: Helios Maximus 1) Natural contrails were a very rare sight in the '60's, '70's & '80's. The few I witnessed were from fighter jets and hi-flying military aircraft--never from passenger jets (which were plentiful). 2) When I first moved to Las Vegas, NV in 1996; it was infrequent to even see ANY cloud of ANY type. It was that dry....just blue sky and oppressive sun day after day after day. Then in 1998 strange tic-tac-toe grids started appearing in the sky turning it grayish-white within a few hours and filling the valley with smog. This became the 'new normal'. None of the aircraft were landing, circling, or taking off from McCarren Airport. Aside from military bases, I know of no other airports within 150 miles of Vegas. 3) Now I live on the East Coast in a very high-traffic air corridor. Any given 'spray-day' I could point out to any open-minded observer that only certain jets are leaving trails. Other airliners flying nearby or even close to the tankers leave no contrails whatsoever. This is irrefutable proof to me of an 'operation'. 4) I can now predict with a fair degree of accuracy when and where the chemtrailing will occur. You will find that most often spraying (especially near metropolitan ares) is most intense at sunrise and late afternoon almost always in the direction of the sun (I believe this is to avoid being obvious, though the diffusion of sunlight is a consideration). Twenty-four to 48 hours prior to a LOW PRESSURE system, spraying becomes persistent and non-stop. 5) Weather forecasters now leave clues telling you days in advance when to expect chemtrails. Some even have new graphics showing wispy non-clouds and use phraseology such as 'growing cirrus clouds later today'....and you can go out and watch them GROWING (unnaturally). 6) I've had the pleasure of living in a half-dozen states over the past 15 years. Once you see the same patterns of chemtrailling, you can easily find on a map which military bases are involved in these flights. Presently I'm between Dover and MacGuire airfields--and every chemtrail flight is headed toward one or the other. And remember.....WHERE THERE'S SHILLS, THERE'S TRUTH TO HIDE! I could be where you were at in the 60's. I saw dissipating contrails but nothing lasting hours. Thrust jet engines were dirty to the degree you could see a high level trail by the shadow it left on lower formations. On weather forecasts, I have seen repeatedly warm hot forecasts get trashed by the next day's lingering haze. You can see high concentrations of the dispersed stuff in freaky rainbows in clouds or around the sun on scorching days. but nothing lasting hours. ...and actually turn into dense clouds. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22021700 United States 04/08/2016 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69768514 Lawyers, by definition, ARE ESQUIRES (un-Constitutional titles of nobility) beholden to the un-Constitutional admiralty/administrative-law courts. The courts are beholden to the military-industrial-"science" complex responsible for these billowing chemtrails. They are not going to sue, because the government shills and the government's thoroughly bought-and-paid-for MSM will make them look like "crazy" for telling the truth. A weeks worth of video could prove their case easily. Yea, but there all lilly-livered leeches sucking on the government and corporate-world teats. I haven't met a brave lawyer since Gerry Spence gave it up... So lawyers can close down coal mining because of coal dust but can do this, I doubt it. no, not exactly but coal mining does produce some stupid people who die young. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71488293 United States 04/08/2016 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yea, but there all lilly-livered leeches sucking on the government and corporate-world teats. I haven't met a brave lawyer since Gerry Spence gave it up... So lawyers can close down coal mining because of coal dust but can do this, I doubt it. Wake up, you little millenial douche canoe. COAL MINING IS SOMETHING THE AGENDA 21 WORSHIPERS AT THE U.N. AND D.C. WANT STOPPED. Got a clue now, dufus? beat them at their own game, fuckface. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70823438 Australia 04/08/2016 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |