If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70610407 ![]() 05/18/2016 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72222219 ![]() 05/18/2016 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This forum is populated by flat earthers and countless tards. You lost 50% of your readers when you used the word premise. The others stopped reading when the logical and predictive part of your paragraph exceededicated their maximum syllable per word count in the first sentence. You then preceeded to make to much sense and failed to trigger anyone with recent buzzwords from the msm lexicon. ![]() |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70610407 ![]() 05/18/2016 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This forum is populated by flat earthers and countless tards. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72222219 You lost 50% of your readers when you used the word premise. The others stopped reading when the logical and predictive part of your paragraph exceededicated their maximum syllable per word count in the first sentence. You then preceeded to make to much sense and failed to trigger anyone with recent buzzwords from the msm lexicon. ![]() So you're saying "What we've got here is failure to communicate."? Damn. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70610407 ![]() 05/18/2016 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71615530 ![]() 05/18/2016 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Either way, the public will buy it. Insidious how they've laid out the false foundation claiming Trump to be racist (stage one), and are now in stage two: Associate all the other so-called anti-diversity issues with Trump as well. They even seem to have invented a new word for the article, now part of the Newspeak Dictionary (2016 edition), apparently: "transantagonism" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14671460 ![]() 05/18/2016 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the title of an article written by Brianna Cox for [link to www.sheknows.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70610407 The cartoon: [link to twitter.com (secure)] There is no way to discuss this propaganda piece logically as it's premise (title) is a passive/aggressive logical fallacy which presupposes the reader's position to be a racist position if any disagreement is made with the authors statements, followed by a rapid fire moving of the goalposts strategy. So you start of with a catch, "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" (reader's presumption: talking to me) "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon" (reader's presumption: discounting my authenticity) and you use that controversy (reader is inflamed to respond) to launch a campaign to show how right you are in the face of inauthentic opposition which shows up as an authentic response to your inauthentic premise. Is that about right? From the article: "America is freaking out over a cartoon of Michelle Obama" "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" "At this point in the 2016 presidential election coverage, it is no longer surprising to hear of racism, sexism or any other vitriol coming from the Trump camp or his supporters. Though he has not specifically endorsed Trump, political cartoonist Ben Garrison has an affinity for cartoons espousing conservative views, and his latest falls right in line with being sexist and racist." "Garrison says the cartoon — which appeared on his website Grrrgraphics.com — meant to "express our outrage at the growing tyranny of Big Government." "Featuring our first lady, Michelle Obama, and Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, it misses the mark in regard to addressing government tyranny and instead expresses racism, sexism and transantagonism. And while the reasons it is offensive are many in number, an age-old message reads loud and clear: black women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women." Lol, best cartoon I have seen in decades!!!! It sure tells the truth. Get rid of the ugly filth and put someone descent in the white house. ![]() |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72222219 ![]() 05/18/2016 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69896691 ![]() 05/18/2016 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71615530 ![]() 05/18/2016 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ar-15 nut User ID: 44044090 ![]() 05/18/2016 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50998494 ![]() 05/18/2016 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50998494 ![]() 05/18/2016 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54849459 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This forum is populated by flat earthers and countless tards. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72222219 You lost 50% of your readers when you used the word premise. The others stopped reading when the logical and predictive part of your paragraph exceededicated their maximum syllable per word count in the first sentence. You then preceeded to make to much sense and failed to trigger anyone with recent buzzwords from the msm lexicon. ![]() So you're saying "What we've got here is failure to communicate."? Damn. :cruiser: :trump_hesright: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71710774 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the title of an article written by Brianna Cox for [link to www.sheknows.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70610407 "Featuring our first lady, Michelle Obama, and Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, it misses the mark in regard to addressing government tyranny and instead expresses racism, sexism and transantagonism. And while the reasons it is offensive are many in number, an age-old message reads loud and clear: black women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women." transantagonism? ![]() |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54849459 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72197935 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71615530 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the title of an article written by Brianna Cox for [link to www.sheknows.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70610407 "Featuring our first lady, Michelle Obama, and Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, it misses the mark in regard to addressing government tyranny and instead expresses racism, sexism and transantagonism. And while the reasons it is offensive are many in number, an age-old message reads loud and clear: black women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women." transantagonism? ![]() Yeah, I know. It's a laugh riot. But at the same time they're deadly serious, and we, sadly, look to be pretty much doomed. But is their seriousness concerned with their ludicrous propositions, or is it concerned with dooming us through the continued indoctrination of the general public through these ludicrous propositions, effectively reducing normalcy and morality to minority status until the world is completely upside down. I said earlier in the thread the following: Thanks for pointing this out. Hard to tell if the woman who wrote the article is aware that she's fallen for the propaganda and is being used to further it, or is a part of the propaganda machine outright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71615530 Either way, the public will buy it. Insidious how they've laid out the false foundation claiming Trump to be racist (stage one), and are now in stage two: Associate all the other so-called anti-diversity issues with Trump as well. They even seem to have invented a new word for the article, now part of the Newspeak Dictionary (2016 edition), apparently: "transantagonism" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70857104 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70857104 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72159492 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50998494 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Masiro I may just have to rent that movie tonight. Can't make a movie like that today - might offend the transexual deviant sodomites. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69713457 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72085579 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the title of an article written by Brianna Cox for [link to www.sheknows.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70610407 The cartoon: [link to twitter.com (secure)] There is no way to discuss this propaganda piece logically as it's premise (title) is a passive/aggressive logical fallacy which presupposes the reader's position to be a racist position if any disagreement is made with the authors statements, followed by a rapid fire moving of the goalposts strategy. So you start of with a catch, "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" (reader's presumption: talking to me) "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon" (reader's presumption: discounting my authenticity) and you use that controversy (reader is inflamed to respond) to launch a campaign to show how right you are in the face of inauthentic opposition which shows up as an authentic response to your inauthentic premise. Is that about right? From the article: "America is freaking out over a cartoon of Michelle Obama" "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" "At this point in the 2016 presidential election coverage, it is no longer surprising to hear of racism, sexism or any other vitriol coming from the Trump camp or his supporters. Though he has not specifically endorsed Trump, political cartoonist Ben Garrison has an affinity for cartoons espousing conservative views, and his latest falls right in line with being sexist and racist." "Garrison says the cartoon — which appeared on his website Grrrgraphics.com — meant to "express our outrage at the growing tyranny of Big Government." "Featuring our first lady, Michelle Obama, and Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, it misses the mark in regard to addressing government tyranny and instead expresses racism, sexism and transantagonism. And while the reasons it is offensive are many in number, an age-old message reads loud and clear: black women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women." Michelle is a tranny, and she looks like one. Deal with it Joan Rivers was MURDERED for outing Michelle. It says a lot about you that appearances matter more than MURDER.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70249533 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72111651 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70249533 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the title of an article written by Brianna Cox for [link to www.sheknows.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70610407 The cartoon: [link to twitter.com (secure)] There is no way to discuss this propaganda piece logically as it's premise (title) is a passive/aggressive logical fallacy which presupposes the reader's position to be a racist position if any disagreement is made with the authors statements, followed by a rapid fire moving of the goalposts strategy. So you start of with a catch, "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" (reader's presumption: talking to me) "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon" (reader's presumption: discounting my authenticity) and you use that controversy (reader is inflamed to respond) to launch a campaign to show how right you are in the face of inauthentic opposition which shows up as an authentic response to your inauthentic premise. Is that about right? From the article: "America is freaking out over a cartoon of Michelle Obama" "If you're not upset about this Michelle Obama cartoon, you're part of the problem" "At this point in the 2016 presidential election coverage, it is no longer surprising to hear of racism, sexism or any other vitriol coming from the Trump camp or his supporters. Though he has not specifically endorsed Trump, political cartoonist Ben Garrison has an affinity for cartoons espousing conservative views, and his latest falls right in line with being sexist and racist." "Garrison says the cartoon — which appeared on his website Grrrgraphics.com — meant to "express our outrage at the growing tyranny of Big Government." "Featuring our first lady, Michelle Obama, and Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, it misses the mark in regard to addressing government tyranny and instead expresses racism, sexism and transantagonism. And while the reasons it is offensive are many in number, an age-old message reads loud and clear: black women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women." black MEN PRETENDING to be women are held to a different standard of "greatness" than white women. ^This you fucking racist tard troll. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17205702 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72236012 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7227274 ![]() 05/18/2016 07:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*H2O Bro User ID: 70736902 ![]() 05/18/2016 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bump and 5 star. Lol I think this art should be put in a museum. It's beautiful! Well.. Meliana is.. ![]() Last Edited by *H2O Bro on 05/18/2016 08:02 PM :battleflag: “The key to immortality is first living a life worth remembering.” - Bruce Lee :Trumpbanner: |