| Users Online Now: 2,064 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 680,760 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,179,013 | Threads Today: 377 | Posts Today: 7,697 |
| 12:00 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,064 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 680,760 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,179,013 | Threads Today: 377 | Posts Today: 7,697 |
| 12:00 PM | ||
Jesus was born in 5 BC and was 16 years old when TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59630227  Singapore05/21/2016 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59630227 Singapore05/21/2016 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71938467 Singapore05/21/2016 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD For those who dont know 7BC TO 14AD IS 21 years Because the BC TO AD DATING GOOES BACKWARDS FROM 7 to 0 then forward in the Ad's So i got it WRONG DIDNT I!! Jesus would have been 23 years old WHEN TIBERIOUS BECAME EMPEROR BECAUSE HE WAS BORN IN 5 BC AND THEN WHEN HE WAS 2 years old THE CENSUS WAS TKAEN IN 7 BC So you need to add two years to his age |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72134287  United States05/21/2016 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70771686 United States05/21/2016 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This meant jesus was born in 5BC Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 BECAUSE TWO YEARS LATER WHEN JESUS WAS TWO YEARS OLD augustus sent out the decree to take the census in 7BC THIS CENSUS IS THE ONE MENTIONED IN LUKE When quintus was chosen to deal with it, although not in charge Quintus took over fron the imcompetant SATINARIOUS . So JESUS WAS 16 years old the year TIBERIOUS BECAME EMPEROR AFTER THE DEATH OF AUGUSTUS WHO WAS THE FIRST OF THE FIRST TEN KINGS OF ROME. JESUS WAS CRUCIFED DURING TIBERIOUS REIGN.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71938467 Singapore05/21/2016 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71938467 Singapore05/21/2016 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71938467 Singapore05/21/2016 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heres the list FIRST WAS AUGUSTUS SECOND WAS TIBERIUS 14 AD TO 37 AD SCROLL TO BOTTOM OF PAGE FOR LIST [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71938467 Singapore05/21/2016 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72152400 United States05/21/2016 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So that means JESUS WAS CRUCIFIED AROUND 22 AD WHEN HE WAS THIRTY YEARS OLD Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71938467 I am guessing JOHN WAS VERY YOUNG WHEN JESUS DIED POSSIBLY AROUND 15 years old or so SO John was around 65 to 70 years old when HE WROTE THE BOOK OF REVELATION BECAUSE DOMITIAN BECAME EMPEROR IN 81AD TO 96 AD AND WE KNOW DOMITIAN WAS RULING DURING JOHNS EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS WHERE HE RECIEVED THE PROPHECIES. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59497123 United States05/21/2016 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heres the list FIRST WAS AUGUSTUS SECOND WAS TIBERIUS 14 AD TO 37 AD SCROLL TO BOTTOM OF PAGE FOR LIST [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Heres the list FIRST WAS AUGUSTUS SECOND WAS TIBERIUS 14 AD TO 37 AD SCROLL TO BOTTOM OF PAGE FOR LIST In regard to DOMTIAN LOOK AT THE SECOND DYNASTY AFTER NERO THE KAST OF THE FIRST FIVE YOU SEE HOW QUICKLY THEY SUCCEED EACHOTHER UPTO DOMITIAN WHO IS THE LAST IN THAT YEAR SO CALLED OF THE FOUR EMPERORS? Yes it was very speedy Unlike the first five EMPERORS FROM the first EVER EMPEROR OF ROME AUGUSTUS THROUGH TO NERO THE FIFTH [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9409701 United States05/21/2016 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD BECAUSE HE WAS BORN IN 5 BC AND THEN WHEN HE WAS 2 years old THE CENSUS WAS TKAEN IN 7 B He would've been born in 9 BC, then two years later is 7 BC. You have to countbackwards. 9 BC comes before 7 BC. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69854373  Canada05/21/2016 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you read the book of revleation When john sees the vision of the seven kings He is told five had already fallen Those five are the first five emperors of that second dynasty The one the angel says now is Is Emperor who put john into exile, HE WAS THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS IN THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY AS ITS CALLED THAT SIXTH EMPEROR WAS DOMITIAN WHOM FIVE HAD ALREADY FALEN BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER. YES UNLIKE THE FIRST EVER ROMAN EMPIRE DYNASTY THE SECOBD DYNASTY HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT NERO WAS KAST OFHTHE FIRST DYNASTY AND SO WHEN NERO CAME TO POWER THERE WERE ONLY FOUR ALREADY FALLEN THIS PROVES THE PROPHECY ABOUNTHE SEVEN KINGS WHICH JOHN RECIEVED FRON THE ANGEL WHO TOLD HIM THERE ARE SEVEN KINGD FIVE HAVE ALREADY FALLEN ONE NOW IS CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN REFERING TO NERO AS ONLY FOUR AND NOT FIVE HAD CO E BEFORE NERO. SO WHAT JOHN IS BEING SHOWN IS THE YEAR OFNTHE FOUR EMPERORS OR THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY WHICH HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT UNLIKE THE FIRST DYNASTY WHICH ONLY HAD FIVE. DOMOTIAN WAS THE SITH EMPEROR OF THE FLAVAIN DYNASTY WHICH WAS THE SECOBD DYNASTY OF THE ROMAN EMPEORORS WHICH JOHN was exled ubder THE LAST OF THOSE EMPERORS DOMITIAN WHO WAS STILL RULING WHILE JOHN WROTE DOWN THE PROPHECY WHILST IN FORCED EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72227407 United States05/21/2016 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This meant jesus was born in 5BC Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 BECAUSE TWO YEARS LATER WHEN JESUS WAS TWO YEARS OLD augustus sent out the decree to take the census in 7BC THIS CENSUS IS THE ONE MENTIONED IN LUKE When quintus was chosen to deal with it, although not in charge Quintus took over fron the imcompetant SATINARIOUS . So JESUS WAS 16 years old the year TIBERIOUS BECAME EMPEROR AFTER THE DEATH OF AUGUSTUS WHO WAS THE FIRST OF THE FIRST TEN KINGS OF ROME. JESUS WAS CRUCIFED DURING TIBERIOUS REIGN. Jesus was born on August 21 of 7 BC. This is FACT. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69854373 Canada05/21/2016 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD BECAUSE HE WAS BORN IN 5 BC AND THEN WHEN HE WAS 2 years old THE CENSUS WAS TKAEN IN 7 B He would've been born in 9 BC, then two years later is 7 BC. You have to countbackwards. 9 BC comes before 7 BC. Lol yeh My stupid mistake I also got Jesus age wrong in 14 AD IN THE TITLE LOL I WAS BEVER ANY GOOD AT MATHS |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9409701 United States05/21/2016 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you read the book of revleation Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69854373 When john sees the vision of the seven kings He is told five had already fallen Those five are the first five emperors of that second dynasty The one the angel says now is Is Emperor who put john into exile, HE WAS THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS IN THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY AS ITS CALLED THAT SIXTH EMPEROR WAS DOMITIAN WHOM FIVE HAD ALREADY FALEN BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER. YES UNLIKE THE FIRST EVER ROMAN EMPIRE DYNASTY THE SECOBD DYNASTY HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT NERO WAS KAST OFHTHE FIRST DYNASTY AND SO WHEN NERO CAME TO POWER THERE WERE ONLY FOUR ALREADY FALLEN THIS PROVES THE PROPHECY ABOUNTHE SEVEN KINGS WHICH JOHN RECIEVED FRON THE ANGEL WHO TOLD HIM THERE ARE SEVEN KINGD FIVE HAVE ALREADY FALLEN ONE NOW IS CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN REFERING TO NERO AS ONLY FOUR AND NOT FIVE HAD CO E BEFORE NERO. SO WHAT JOHN IS BEING SHOWN IS THE YEAR OFNTHE FOUR EMPERORS OR THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY WHICH HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT UNLIKE THE FIRST DYNASTY WHICH ONLY HAD FIVE. DOMOTIAN WAS THE SITH EMPEROR OF THE FLAVAIN DYNASTY WHICH WAS THE SECOBD DYNASTY OF THE ROMAN EMPEORORS WHICH JOHN was exled ubder THE LAST OF THOSE EMPERORS DOMITIAN WHO WAS STILL RULING WHILE JOHN WROTE DOWN THE PROPHECY WHILST IN FORCED EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS. If John is referring to the Roman empire that has already come and gone, and the end of the world isn't here yet, and Jesus hasn't yet arrived. Could this mean The book of Revelation isn't inspired? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69854373 Canada05/21/2016 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD I matched all the historic dates Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59630227 The census was taken by order of Augustus in 7BC AND TIBERIUS BECAME EMPEROR IN 14 AD BECAUSE HE WAS BORN IN 5 BC AND THEN WHEN HE WAS 2 years old THE CENSUS WAS TKAEN IN 7 B He would've been born in 9 BC, then two years later is 7 BC. You have to countbackwards. 9 BC comes before 7 BC. Lol yeh My stupid mistake I also got Jesus age wrong in 14 AD IN THE TITLE LOL I WAS BEVER ANY GOOD AT MATHS Wow You know i asked God when was jesus born And i got the year 9bc Then because i did all this and counted it wrong i thought i had only thought that number myself Lol GOD ANSWERED ME BUT BECAUSE OF ME THE GOING AND LOOKING AND TRYING TO WORK IT ALL OUT I ENDED UP MAKING THAT MESS!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68633678 Canada05/21/2016 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you read the book of revleation Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69854373 When john sees the vision of the seven kings He is told five had already fallen Those five are the first five emperors of that second dynasty The one the angel says now is Is Emperor who put john into exile, HE WAS THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS IN THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY AS ITS CALLED THAT SIXTH EMPEROR WAS DOMITIAN WHOM FIVE HAD ALREADY FALEN BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER. YES UNLIKE THE FIRST EVER ROMAN EMPIRE DYNASTY THE SECOBD DYNASTY HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT NERO WAS KAST OFHTHE FIRST DYNASTY AND SO WHEN NERO CAME TO POWER THERE WERE ONLY FOUR ALREADY FALLEN THIS PROVES THE PROPHECY ABOUNTHE SEVEN KINGS WHICH JOHN RECIEVED FRON THE ANGEL WHO TOLD HIM THERE ARE SEVEN KINGS FIVE HAVE ALREADY FALLEN ONE NOW IS CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN REFERING TO NERO AS ONLY FOUR AND NOT FIVE HAD CO E BEFORE NERO. SO WHAT JOHN IS BEING SHOWN IS THE YEAR OFNTHE FOUR EMPERORS OR THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY WHICH HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT UNLIKE THE FIRST DYNASTY WHICH ONLY HAD FIVE. DOMOTIAN WAS THE SITH EMPEROR OF THE FLAVAIN DYNASTY WHICH WAS THE SECOBD DYNASTY OF THE ROMAN EMPEORORS WHICH JOHN was exled ubder THE LAST OF THOSE EMPERORS DOMITIAN WHO WAS STILL RULING WHILE JOHN WROTE DOWN THE PROPHECY WHILST IN FORCED EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS. If John is referring to the Roman empire that has already come and gone, and the end of the world isn't here yet, and Jesus hasn't yet arrived. Could this mean The book of Revelation isn't inspired? If you read the book of revleation Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69854373 When john sees the vision of the seven kings He is told five had already fallen Those five are the first five emperors of that second dynasty The one the angel says now is Is Emperor who put john into exile, HE WAS THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS IN THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY AS ITS CALLED THAT SIXTH EMPEROR WAS DOMITIAN WHOM FIVE HAD ALREADY FALEN BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER. YES UNLIKE THE FIRST EVER ROMAN EMPIRE DYNASTY THE SECOBD DYNASTY HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT NERO WAS KAST OFHTHE FIRST DYNASTY AND SO WHEN NERO CAME TO POWER THERE WERE ONLY FOUR ALREADY FALLEN THIS PROVES THE PROPHECY ABOUNTHE SEVEN KINGS WHICH JOHN RECIEVED FRON THE ANGEL WHO TOLD HIM THERE ARE SEVEN KINGD FIVE HAVE ALREADY FALLEN ONE NOW IS CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN REFERING TO NERO AS ONLY FOUR AND NOT FIVE HAD CO E BEFORE NERO. SO WHAT JOHN IS BEING SHOWN IS THE YEAR OFNTHE FOUR EMPERORS OR THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY WHICH HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT UNLIKE THE FIRST DYNASTY WHICH ONLY HAD FIVE. DOMOTIAN WAS THE SITH EMPEROR OF THE FLAVAIN DYNASTY WHICH WAS THE SECOBD DYNASTY OF THE ROMAN EMPEORORS WHICH JOHN was exled ubder THE LAST OF THOSE EMPERORS DOMITIAN WHO WAS STILL RULING WHILE JOHN WROTE DOWN THE PROPHECY WHILST IN FORCED EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS. If John is referring to the Roman empire that has already come and gone, and the end of the world isn't here yet, and Jesus hasn't yet arrived. Could this mean The book of Revelation isn't inspired? The prophecy we are talking about shows that smpire was taken over by the 8 th king who is called both the veast king and the beast itself It refers to the fact ROME was taken over by the Papacy Also in the book of Daniel the sameis shown And it is shown that ROME will only be truly destroyed when Jesus returns This is pictured by a Mountain not made of human hands TOTALLY DESTROYNG THE LAST EMPIRE ON EARTH ROME THAT MOUNTSIN WHICH MEANS CHRIST COMES AND DESTROYS ROME BABYLON THE GREAT AT HIS RETURN. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70873824 Canada05/21/2016 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Each of the seven kings had a name of blasphemy The 8th king Is the beast and is one of the seven When, in 375, Emperor Gratian declined to accept this august title, believing its pagan origins unsuited to a Christian monarch, the Bishop of Rome, Pope Damasus I, appropriated the title Pontifex Maximus to himself. Thus the religio-political title of the Caesars passed without objection to the Papacy, together with its implied union of church and state. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72252196 United States05/21/2016 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70873824 Canada05/21/2016 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70873824 Canada05/21/2016 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68678584 Canada05/21/2016 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The title of Blasphemy of the 8 th king The Pope is the Bishop of Rome, and thereby the world leader of the Catholic Church. The word comes from the Latin papa, which means “father.” He is also the head of the Vatican, the tiny, sovereign, city-state within Rome. The Catholic Church believes that he is the Apostle Peter’s successor and may speak infallibly, when he chooses to speak ex cathedra, which literally means “from the chair of St. Peter.” |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68678584 Canada05/21/2016 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The 8 th KING IS THE BEAST Robert Neville, in his book, The World of the Vatican, has truly asserted, "In certain respects the Pope himself appears to be the lineal descendent of the Caesars" (Harper and Row, New York, page 10). Neville points out that terms such as Pontifex Maximus, the Roman Church, and Diocese stem from the emperors. He could have added others such as Cardinals, but the greatest evidence for Neville’s conclusion is the convergence of prophecy and history in this matter. |
loveexists  User ID: 66790266 United States05/21/2016 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The messiah was most likely born in 2 BC. There is no 'year 0' 2 BC-1 BC = 1 Year 1 BC-1 AD = 1 Year 2 BC-1 AD = 2 Years 1 AD-14 AD = 13 Years Therefore 2 BC-14 AD = 15 Years 15 'gregorian years', that is. 5479 Days. In the original 'biblical' hebrew calendar, each year contained approximately 12.33333 'lunar cycles/months', with each month being approximately 29.53 days ... 5479 Days = 15 'Biblical' Hebrew years, and 15.95 days. The 'reign' of Tiberius began on what would be in the 'gregorian calendar', September 18, 14 AD. The most likely date for Messiah's birth is September 11, 2 BC. Meaning the messiah was 15 years, 22 days in his earthly incarnation, when Tiberius became emperor in 14 AD. In his 16th year, but not 16. The 'first year of life' in 'biblical terminology' would be from birth until the age of 1. The '16th year' would be from the age of 15 to the age of 16. Meaning the Messiah was in his 16th year when Tiberius became 'emperor', but was not '16', in the 'gregorian' sense. Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence |
| loveexists User ID: 66790266 United States05/21/2016 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you read the book of revleation Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69854373 When john sees the vision of the seven kings He is told five had already fallen Those five are the first five emperors of that second dynasty The one the angel says now is Is Emperor who put john into exile, HE WAS THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS IN THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY AS ITS CALLED THAT SIXTH EMPEROR WAS DOMITIAN WHOM FIVE HAD ALREADY FALEN BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER. YES UNLIKE THE FIRST EVER ROMAN EMPIRE DYNASTY THE SECOBD DYNASTY HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT NERO WAS KAST OFHTHE FIRST DYNASTY AND SO WHEN NERO CAME TO POWER THERE WERE ONLY FOUR ALREADY FALLEN THIS PROVES THE PROPHECY ABOUNTHE SEVEN KINGS WHICH JOHN RECIEVED FRON THE ANGEL WHO TOLD HIM THERE ARE SEVEN KINGD FIVE HAVE ALREADY FALLEN ONE NOW IS CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN REFERING TO NERO AS ONLY FOUR AND NOT FIVE HAD CO E BEFORE NERO. SO WHAT JOHN IS BEING SHOWN IS THE YEAR OFNTHE FOUR EMPERORS OR THE FLAVIAN DYNASTY WHICH HAD SIX EMPERORS IN IT UNLIKE THE FIRST DYNASTY WHICH ONLY HAD FIVE. DOMOTIAN WAS THE SITH EMPEROR OF THE FLAVAIN DYNASTY WHICH WAS THE SECOBD DYNASTY OF THE ROMAN EMPEORORS WHICH JOHN was exled ubder THE LAST OF THOSE EMPERORS DOMITIAN WHO WAS STILL RULING WHILE JOHN WROTE DOWN THE PROPHECY WHILST IN FORCED EXILE ON THE ISLAND OF PATMOS. If John is referring to the Roman empire that has already come and gone, and the end of the world isn't here yet, and Jesus hasn't yet arrived. Could this mean The book of Revelation isn't inspired? The 'roman empire' went 'underground' in 476 AD, it was never 'abolished'. Romulus Augustulus held the titles to the 'roman empire' until his death in 498 ...They were passed to 'Lucius Tiberius' who openly restored the roman empire to 'overt political power' in 501 ... In 507, the brythonic 'monarch' since 'romanticized' as 'King Arthur' invaded Italy and killed Lucius Tiberius, seizing the title of 'roman emperor' for himself ... Once 'Arthur' became 'Roman Emperor', 'Rome' entered its new stage as the 'arthurian empire' ... By the end of his reign 'Arthur' had become so 'power hungry' that he sought to openly and immediately establish the 'new world order' and preside over earth as 'the beast' ... The Vatican was 'weary' of this plot, as their 'agenda' involved gradually conditioning the masses over several centuries to accept the 'new world order' ... The 'Vatican' decided that the masses were not yet 'ready' for the 'new world order', that their 'plan' would more easily come to 'fruition' if given at least 15 centuries to 'unravel' ... 'Arthur', however, disagreed ... He sought to openly establish the 'new world order' in 537 ... So the Vatican sent his illegitimate son Mordred to kill him ... Once 'Arthur' was dead, the Vatican seized the titles to the roman empire, and rome's 'political authority' remained in the hands of its 'ecclesiastical branch', the Vatican, until the titles to the roman empire were bestowed on Carolus of Francia - "Charlemagne" - in 800 AD ... "Charlemagne" was the direct agnatic descendant of Mordred, and was very likely the 'reincarnation' of Arthur ... Once he received the titles to the 'roman empire', 'Francia' was openly allotted to the 'Roman Empire' as a direct 'territorial possession' of Rome, and the 'Romman Empire' was once more brought into overt political power as the 'Holy Roman Empire', no longer remaining an 'occulted legal entity' but openly presiding over the modern day territories of France, Germany, Austria, Luxembourg, & Liechtenstein - then known as 'Francia' - as its government ... (alongside of Francia's colonies, among them Italy, which Carolus 'conquered' in the late 8th century) ... The 'Holy Roman Empire' was the final stage of Rome's 1st 'Reich'/Stage, and its first German 'Reich'/Stage ... It existed as an 'underground' system from 840-843, 843-877 and 879-962, but was in 'open political power' from 800-840, 843, 877-879, and 962-1806 ... When Napoleon conquered the 'Holy Roman Empire' in 1806, he seized the titles to the Roman Empire from Francis II, before marrying into his 'bloodline' by marrying his daughter Marie Louise ... (Napoleon was already related to Lucius Tiberius on his father's side) .. 'Rome' then entered its 2nd Reich/'Stage' as the 'Napoleonic Empire', which existed until the 1870s ... though it was an 'underground', 'occulted' entity from 1814-march 1815, and from july 1815-1852 ... In the aftermath of the 'franco-prussian war', the kingdom of prussia conquered France, holding it as a colony until it gained independence in 1871 under Adolphe Thiers and the 'Third French Republic' ... When Prussia conquered France, Napoleon III was stripped of his titles as 'Roman Emperor', and they were 'granted' to Wilhelm of Prussia ... Several months latter, Otto von Bismarck's 'german unification' campaign led to the unification of the various german states that had seceded from the 'Holy Roman Empire' during its 'existence', among them Prussia ... 'Prussia' was combined with surrounding nations into a 'unified german state' ... Though 'Prussia' no longer 'existed' as a political entity, Wilhelm of Prussia, the titular 'roman emperor', was appointed 'Emperor' of this new german state ... the 'Empire of Germany' ... 'Wilhelm' would openly parade his roman titles as Emperor, openly referring to himself as 'Caesar' ... or, in the german tongue, 'Kaiser' ... It was as the 'german empire' that 'Rome' entered its 2nd German 'Reich'/Stage ... In the aftermath of World War I, Kaiser Wilhelm II was stripped of his titles as roman emperor, which were then bestowed upon the newly created entity, the 'League of Nations', and its 'head', Eric Drummond ... The 'League of Nations' existed as the new 'incarnation' of Rome, with its 'head' openly possessing the titles to the 'roman empire', until these 'titles' were passed to Pius XI, the 'Pope' of Rome and head of Rome's 'ecclesiastical branch', in 1922 ... One Pius XI inherited the titles to the 'roman empire', a 'plot' was hatched with globalist puppet Benito Mussolini, that a 'section' of Rome would openly become its own 'sovereign nation', outside of the 'jurisdiction' of Italy & surrounding nations ... rather, presiding over the various 'nation states' as an 'entity' they would be forced to 'answer to' in the Vatican's system of corporate 'maritime law' .... thus 'Vatican City' was born ... The titles to the roman empire were bestowed on a certain german 'politician' by the vatican in late 1932 ... Adolf Hitler, the head of Germany's Nazi Party, globalist/rothschild puppet and controlled opposition agent, sought to enter the race for Chancellor of Germany, and be appointed as President Hindenberg's 'Chancellor' by January 1933 ... Once appointed 'Chancellor', Hitler's 'role' would be to establish an openly totalitarian state over germany, in part to 'justify' the 'initiation' of World War II, so that the 'United Nations' may be born out of such 'conflict', alongside of the 'conditions' that would be used to bring the third world war into fruition, and ultimately, initiate the 'false armageddon' ... Once Hitler had obtained the titles to the roman empire, he was appointed as 'Chancellor of Germany' in 1933 ... Originally, 'Chancellor' was a position comparable to 'vice president' ... the 'President' was the ultimate Head of 'State', who the 'Chancellor' answered to ... However, in February 1933, after setting fire to the reichstag and blaming it on 'political opponents', Hitler declared that germany was in a 'state of emergency' that President Hindenberg was incapable of solving as 'adequately' as Hitler ... because of this, according to Hitler, the position of 'Chancellor' must be granted more authority than previously, until it is 'allowed' to completely control the government, with all other 'offices', including the office of President, being forced to answer to it ... thus, without even 'usurping' the head of germany's government, Hitler simply redefined the 'legal/political terminology', so that the 'Chancellor' became the 'ruler' of Germany, whereas before it was simply one of many political offices under the jurisdiction of the 'President' ... under Hitler's new 'terminology', the 'Chancellor' held 'complete authority' over the government, and the 'President' was nothing more than a puppet post in the cabinet of the Chancellor ... Thus, from February 1933 onwards, though Hitler remained as 'Chancellor' and hindenberg remained as 'President', Hindenbetg was Hitler's puppet, now that the 'Presidency' had been transformed into a puppet post, rather than vice versa ... Within days of assuming 'complete control' over Germany now that the position of 'chancellor' had been redefined, Hitler abolished the 'Weimar Republic', outlawing all political parties other than his own Nazi Party, and, as 'Roman Emperor', once more bringing the 'Roman Empire' into open political power over Germany, as 'Nazi Germany' ... Rome's 3rd German 'Reich'/Stage ... Rome's 2nd 'Reich'/Stage, lasting from 1806-1933, had now 'phased into' a new stage ... Its third Reich/Stage ... and this 'Third Reich' began with the 3rd 'German Reich' ... Nazi Germany ... Hitler presided over Nazi Germany as its dictator - as roman emperor - until his death in 1945 ... his 'official title' remained Chancellor until 1934, when he murdered his own puppet president Hindenberg, and appointed himself his own puppet president, in Hindenberg's place ... he eventually combined the positions of 'Chancellor' and 'Puppet President' into the position of 'Fuhrer', which remained his 'official title' until his death ... The titles to the 'Roman Empire' were passed to George Scherff, brother of general Walter Scherff, after Hitler's death ... 'Nazi Germany' went 'underground' after may 1945 ... though the territory of 'Germany' was eventually split between a communist regime in the east, and a 'democratic' regime in the west, the 'nazi infrastructure' remained 'underground', 'occulted' ... Roman Emperor George Scherff's titles were eventually passed to his son, George Scherff II, alias 'George HW Bush', who was commissioned with infiltrating the United States and posing as the 'biological son' of pro-nazi senator Prescott Sheldon Bush ... 'George HW Bush' eventually bestowed his 'roman titles' on to the United Nations when it was 'formed' in late 1945 ... once the 'UN' received the titles to the 'roman empire', Rome entered its new 'stage' as the UN ... Rome still 'governs' the planet as its 'secret empire' ... its main 'ecclesiastical branch' is the vatican and its main 'political arms', as of 2016, are the UN and the EU ... 'rome' is still in its third 'reich'/stage ... it simply no longer openly, or solely, presides over germany as its 'government', thus, the '3rd german reich', can be considered to no longer 'exist' ... but many elements of the 'infrastructure' constructed by the nazis still remain ... and the 'roman system' it acted as a 'manifestation' of has now 'manifested' as the UN, EU, etc ... The 'New World Order' will ultimately be the fourth 'reich'/stage of the roman empire ... Last Edited by loveexists on 05/21/2016 07:11 PM Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence |
