D-WAVE X2 Quantum Computing explained with documentation and explains the Mandela Effect (video)

Ghey n complete BS

I forgot this description for the video:

D Wave Quantum Computing Audio Repaired

Paul Adams
1,946 views
Published on Jun 12, 2016

AUDIO CORRECTED

The D-Wave X2 Quantum Computer......THIS is the Beast System. Reality is NOT what you think. If you REALLY want to know about the Mandela Effect and it is not only possible but VERY VERY REAL... WATCH AND SHARE THIS VIDEO!!!!

Me114

pin request due to this is the answer for why there is a Mandela Effect.

Firstly let me thank you for the explanation.

One question remains always for me:
ok these computers are SO FAST....

but exactly WHAT are they computing????
WHAT equation takes 10 000 years to compute?????

What are they doing?

Yes, ok 0 and 1 at the same time ...
but what is the task that takes 10 000 years????

Can anyone tell me what they compute?
.
.

which calculation exactly takes 10 000 years????
.

The Earth! As in the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy....:)

I do not know what kind of task they are given, but more importantly is the platform on which the chip is computing is on PARTICLES.

Me114

D-WAVE X2 Quantum Computing explained with documentation and explains the Mandela Effect (video)

I am 46 minutes in and have given you my synopsis below. It remains to be seen if I can give you more synopsis later.



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Continuing my synopsis from 47 minutes in.


Re: embedded video, the presenter says we can grab resources from a parallel universe and draw them into ours.

Adams says that CERN has more than one, up to three, quantum computers networked together (but I cannot find any confirmation of this info).

Starting at 52 minutes Adams says I need to point this out. They're talking about going down to the super small. And superpositioning. And they have all these particles and an infinite number of particles in infinite different directions in superpositioning. And they are able to calculate and select ONE. And then they retranslate that back into standard classical computer understanding of 1's and 0's. So that they can understand what they've done. By doing this they are actually changing in the super small. Which means in the super small with an infinite number of possibilities for one event, they are making a selection to pull out this information which changes what the event came out to be.

For example by pulling out and changing in the super small by even the slightest amount in the superpositioning of these particles the e becomes and a in berenstein.

So that the berenstein and berentain bears BOTH existed. So they both exist in the same reality.



back to the embedded video: The difference between the chip in USC to the one at NASA the speed went up by 500,000.

Now to second embedded video: The scientist states that there are states of matter that have been created now in which one object (particle) can be viewed in up to 3000 positions. The first of these objects were called bose-einstein condensates.

Adams says a comparison is that You, at the same time, could be at the beach, or at work, or at the mall, or at the grocery store, etc. all at the same time. Exponentially at the same time doing a million things. This example is at the macro level; they are doing it with the infinitely small world, particle.

When you change a particle that has an infinite amount of outcomes for one event, and you translate it back, you change the particle and the outcome.

It's called spooky movement.




[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Adams says they have the ability to go into the infinitely small and change the particle, change the location and its superposition. Let's say the outcome for our reality is superposition number 3, they can locate and detect these infinite number of superpositions, pick out one, translate it back and in the process change the outcome for that particle in the real world.

The outcome is that both events occurred in the same reality.

Adams says this is the Great Deception.

This Deception is on such a level that the born-again, Holy Spirit filled people that have been following Yashua (Jesus), and preaching His Word; even the very elect can be deceived by this, if it were possible.

Those of us with our eyes open are trying to tell you this. The scientists are physically and literally changing reality; they have the ability and are doing it.

We are in the last of the last of the last days.




Adams says God's Holy Spirit led him to make this video.

Adams says we are at the end of the very end (the movie credits have already scrolled by).

Reality is crumbling before you.












Me114

Last Edited by Me114 on 07/01/2016 03:21 PM

Oh my God, I forgot to give credit to where I found this video!

It was posted on: Thread: Official Mandela Effect Think Tank. Code Potentially Cracked? (Page 55)

by

hankie
User ID: 71719409
United States
07/01/2016 04:53 AM

Me114

agreed. Complete psuedoscience crap mixed with half truths.

Great thread, Me114!

Glad you gave credit to the "Think Tank" Mandela
Effect thread--it has a wonderful collection of
theories and a good discussion base. I've put
my thread up on there, too. This is one I have
up tonight:
Thread: Something Strange: Pope Frances Present in U.S.(Week of Tetrad Moon 9-28) as LIGO Detects "Gravitational Waves"--Reason Boehner Wept? Video

My thoughts on this...and this is NOT to say that
the D-Wave Super Computer couldn't affect reality
I really don't know enough about it to comment. But
I would just throw out there that in order for there
to be "ripple-in-space-time" there must be MASSIVE
amounts of energy. I'm talking about Comet Neat--
TWICE THE SIZE OF JUPITER doing a "gravity dance" with
our sun in 2003--which can't really even be calculated
as far as the "tork-affect' on our local space-time.
Here is the video to give you an idea:


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Comments about the 2003 fly-by of Comet "Neat"
which would have had a massive gravitational effect
on our planet as it "danced" with our star. Watch
that video on "Gravitational Waves" posted above
and substitute this HUGE comet and the sun with the
two marbles the animator is showing you for the
"ripple-effect" on the fabric of space-time reality.

So, to give little humans with their very limited affects
on powers the size of that which I'm speaking of in
the 2003 event, I think you are giving way too much
credit to an earth-based cause for the "Mandela Effect."

It's an interesting theory, however, and I'll definitely
look into your video! Thanks for the 'Heads-up!"


O'sCookie

Here's what I think about Mandela effect...

We already know that quantum entangled particles effect each other over distance, instantaneously. No time involved. Observe one particle, the other changes/responds immediately.

The Mandela effect, I believe is an observable response to the manipulation of a quantum system in which the quantum particles are entangled "through" time.
For example, the Berenstain/stein bears. I think that in these cases, the "ideas" are entangled and then observed/manipulated remotely...

I'll try and explain it more clearly.
The IDEA that Berenstein Bears is spelled a certain way (doesn't matter which way in this example) exists in, lets say, 2 different "times" - 1987 and 2016.
I think that it is possible to entangle the IDEA from one time with the same IDEA in another time. Perhaps as "time" progresses, IDEAS develop such entanglements naturally in a similar manner to how the useage/definitions of words/languages naturally evolves over time. Indeed, it appears all systems naturally move towards a state of maximum entropy, so it might follow that entanglements naturally increase/or become more aware within the collective unconscious.

In some way, the IDEAS being held in the collective unconscious are being changed by an observer interacting with an IDEA's different potentials, thus changing the expression of that IDEA in reality. No one is going around physically replacing the books with a different spelling. The force that generates the reality we currently experience is being manipulated. But apparantly not everyone is experiencing the exact same reality, so this must introduce some amount of uncertainty in the physical expression.

What does this point to though? I think this is the more important issue. Time can't be viewed linearly in my explanation. 'Everything' 'must' be 'happening' 'now'.
Also, the uncertainty in output (some remember berenstein, some remember berenstain) I think points to and reinforces the idea that consciousness isn't local and 'exists' outside of our current way of experiencing time.
It also points to and reinforces the belief that some preach that reality is an illusion, and can be manipulated remotely.

Thinking more upon it now, I think there's a link to Planck time and the fluctuation of 'existence'.. as physical reality blinks in and out of existence, awareness persists. This awareness is the observer, this is what "we" really "are" when the illusions are gone. The non-congruent changes to reality are things that take place 'behind the scenes' during the blink 'off' state.
Why though? I see dominoes falling, so I think that indicates that what is happening, although it seems insane to "us" "now", is entirely a natural progression.

It would take that long on the computers we use. Big calculations and being they are physicist You should be able to think of some. like how would you change something that has already happened, maybe, How would you can it? can it be done? can you bring power items from, another dimension oh, yes that would be one.

Now, have you seen the one where they are looking at a monitor and healing a scientist over there with their hands over her abdomen? Healed in less than either 3 hours or less it was fast but I forget how fast, it could have been 3 minute, but 3 hours seems better. She had a tumor in her abdomen, now it is gone.

Yes things are going on, and it is in the bible about healing and raising the dead but not in his name so, who know what they are doing.

What do you mean? "the one where they are looking at a monitor..."

no idea what you are writing about. Please elaborate or link.

Minimum entropy. Spin a coin.

"They" would be wise to leave Mother Earth and her gravity ALONE.

"They" should listen to what D-WAVE is telling them ;)

<<waves>>
To my best friend!

Tachyons exhibit faster than light travel, nothing spooky about it if you focus your will ;)

Gotta get to work!

My research this morning.

how does a quantum computer work?

Superposition frees us of from binary constraints. A quantum computer works with particles that can be in superposition. Rather than representing bits — such particles would represent qubits, which can take on the value 0, or 1, or both simultaneously. Oct 1, 2015

From: [link to computer.howstuffworks.com] How Quantum Computers Work

If, as Moore's Law states, the number of transistors on a microprocessor continues to double every 18 months, the year 2020 or 2030 will find the circuits on a microprocessor measured on an atomic scale. And the logical next step will be to create quantum computers, which will harness the power of atoms and molecules to perform memory and processing tasks. Quantum computers have the potential to perform certain calculations significantly faster than any silicon-based computer.

Quantum computers aren't limited to two states; they encode information as quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in superposition. Qubits represent atoms, ions, photons or electrons and their respective control devices that are working together to act as computer memory and a processor. Because a quantum computer can contain these multiple states simultaneously, it has the potential to be millions of times more powerful than today's most powerful supercomputers.

The Bloch sphere is a representation of a qubit, the fundamental building block of quantum computers. ( Look up to get a photo, it is just a sphere signifying that the states can be in any direction and all directions at the same time).

This superposition of qubits is what gives quantum computers their inherent parallelism. According to physicist David Deutsch, this parallelism allows a quantum computer to work on a million computations at once, while your desktop PC works on one.

One problem with the idea of quantum computers is that if you try to look at the subatomic particles, you could bump them, and thereby change their value. If you look at a qubit in superposition to determine its value, the qubit will assume the value of either 0 or 1, but not both (effectively turning your spiffy quantum computer into a mundane digital computer). To make a practical quantum computer, scientists have to devise ways of making measurements indirectly to preserve the system's integrity. Entanglement provides a potential answer. In quantum physics, if you apply an outside force to two atoms, it can cause them to become entangled, and the second atom can take on the properties of the first atom. So if left alone, an atom will spin in all directions. The instant it is disturbed it chooses one spin, or one value; and at the same time, the second entangled atom will choose an opposite spin, or value. This allows scientists to know the value of the qubits without actually looking at them.



Year 1998

Los Alamos and MIT researchers managed to spread a single qubit across three nuclear spins in each molecule of a liquid solution of alanine ... or trichloroethylene ... molecules. Spreading out the qubit made it harder to corrupt, allowing researchers to use entanglement to study interactions between states as an indirect method for analyzing the quantum information.



Year 2000

In March, scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory announced the development of a 7-qubit quantum computer within a single drop of liquid. The quantum computer uses nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to manipulate particles in the atomic nuclei of molecules of trans-crotonic acid, a simple fluid consisting of molecules made up of six hydrogen and four carbon atoms. The NMR is used to apply electromagnetic pulses, which force the particles to line up. These particles in positions parallel or counter to the magnetic field allow the quantum computer to mimic the information-encoding of bits in digital computers.

... Quantum computers could also be used to search large databases in a fraction of the time that it would take a conventional computer. Other applications could include using quantum computers to study quantum mechanics, or even to design other quantum computers.

< 50% of that four page article



From: [link to plus.maths.org (secure)] Submitted by mf344 on October 1, 2015

Re: current computers: On the machine level, this either/or dichotomy is represented using electrical circuits which can either be closed, in which case a current flows, or open, in which case there isn't a current.

Re: Schrödinger's equation: Tiny particles, such as electrons or photons, can simultaneously take on states that we would normally deem mutually exclusive. They can be in several places at once, for example, and in the case of photons simultaneously exhibit two kinds of polarisation. We never see this superposition of different states in ordinary life because it somehow disappears once a system is observed: when you measure the location of an electron or the polarisation of a photon, all but one of the possible alternatives are eliminated and you will see just one. Nobody knows how that happens, but it does.

Particles can be entangled even if they are separated in space, a fact that caused Einstein to call entanglement "spooky action at a distance"

Entanglement means that describing a system of several qubits using ordinary classical information, such as bits or numbers, isn't simply about stringing together the descriptions of the individual qubits. Instead, you need to describe all the correlations between the different qubits. As you increase the number of qubits, the number of those correlations grows exponentially: for n qubits there are 2 to the n correlations. This number quickly explodes: to describe a system of 300 qubits you'd already need more numbers than there are atoms in the visible Universe.



Here is the whole video that was excerpted in Adams video.


How Does a Quantum Computer Work?
Veritasium
1,947,356 views
Published on Jun 17, 2013


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



... and we say that the quantum state "collapses" to a classical state as a result of making the measurement.

From: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quantum computing

... Finally, upon termination of the algorithm, the result needs to be read off. In the case of a classical computer, we sample from the probability distribution on the three-bit register to obtain one definite three-bit string, say 000. Quantum mechanically, we measure the three-qubit state, which is equivalent to collapsing the quantum state down to a classical distribution (with the coefficients in the classical state being the squared magnitudes of the coefficients for the quantum state, as described above), followed by sampling from that distribution. Note that this destroys the original quantum state. Many algorithms will only give the correct answer with a certain probability. However, by repeatedly initializing, running and measuring the quantum computer's results, the probability of getting the correct answer can be increased. In contrast, counterfactual quantum computation allows the correct answer to be inferred when the quantum computer is not actually running in a technical sense, though earlier initialization and frequent measurements are part of the counterfactual computation protocol.

... Since chemistry and nanotechnology rely on understanding quantum systems, and such systems are impossible to simulate in an efficient manner classically, many believe quantum simulation will be one of the most important applications of quantum computing. Quantum simulation could also be used to simulate the behavior of atoms and particles at unusual conditions such as the reactions inside a collider.

From: [link to qoqms.phys.strath.ac.uk] Quantum Computing

The main difficulty is that the microscopic object on which we store each qubit must be isolated from its environment as much as possible to prevent decoherence, where information leaks into the environment. This leaking of information can also be seen as noise from the environment randomising the state of the qubit. Quantum systems are very sensitive to this noise, and such randomisation becomes more difficult to avoid as the system becomes larger.

See interesting article: [link to www.sciencealert.com]

Hopefully these snippets have helped us understand more about how Quantum Computing works. I thought that the fact that they can help build better quantum computers was extremely important.

Me114

Thank you for your research and excellent links, hankie.

Here is a link for us: [link to www.gizmag.com]

Quantum computing breakthrough: Qubits made from standard silicon transistors

Dario Borghino October 6, 2015

In what is likely a major breakthrough for quantum computing, researchers from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Australia have managed for the first time to build the fundamental blocks of a quantum computer in silicon. The device was created using standard manufacturing techniques, by modifying current-generation silicon transistors, and the technology could scale up to include thousands, even millions of entangled quantum bits on a single chip.

...

Last year, UNSW scientists were able to create single "CMOS type" qubits that leveraged current transistor technology and silicon-28, a very common isotope of silicon, to achieve a very high fidelity of 99.6 percent for quantum operations. Now, the researchers have built on this to create what's known as a CNOT quantum logic gate. Together with a single controllable qubit, this is the basic building block of a quantum computer, and paves the way to quantum chips that can perform just about any operation.

...

The real power of this breakthrough is not in a slightly higher operational temperature, but in the fact that these basic building blocks of quantum computers were built by doing simple modifications to current-generation silicon transistors. The researchers say they have worked out a way to extend this technique to a much larger number of qubits, even numbering in the thousands of millions, all reported to be fully entangled.

...

<50%

Me114

Last Edited by Me114 on 07/02/2016 01:47 PM

could there be a quantumnet, and internet through the quantum computers that allows sharing of information between the timelines?

I have read that quantum computers can be networked.

Me114

Aka: Akashic records

Makes senses that people could access them before the super computer was built. Because it is truly in a "now" state, even "then"

Very interesting

Mandelbrot Set is no longer a coincidence to Mandela effect.

There is also another computer which will be more powerful than the quantum computer. They will synthesise gravitational waves. Then it isn't only superposition but transposition also. Then it won't matter how many qubits you have.

Finally a serious discussion on Quantum Computers.

I'll check out the vid later today.

I've been trying to wake people up to this for years.

Humanity is on the verge of monumental changes.

















Last Edited by Base12 on 07/02/2016 03:57 PM

Done.

How long will it take a quantum computer to crack bitcoin ?

So many things wrong... Adams has zero idea what he's talking about.

This is the irony of modern Sci-Fi movies.

It's all a sham.

Once Quantum Computers begin to produce AI, the Elites will have no need for rust bucket space ships or silly teleporters (like in Star Trek, Star Wars or 2001).

All of that tech becomes obsolete over night once the DNA manipulation begins and Man can teleport himself by thought.

Do you understand?